Traded Tom Barrass & 2025 F4 (WCE) traded to Hawthorn for 2025 F1, F2 & F3 (all Haw)

[bzparkes]

This is the last time I’m responding because you’re clearly not actually reading anything.

1. I didn’t say eagles have to match it, just that if they actually wanted him to stay and not push for a move, then they would have given there is no financial or cap based reason not to reward a life member of the club.

2. Hawks were significantly younger than the eagles and had been building for the previous 2 years, I don’t know how you could possibly make the argument for a sudden turn around given you’re still clearly rebuilding, but good luck with that if that’s the case.

3. You are lying by continuing to argue that this trade is entirely driven by the hawks, because you know you’re not going to get maximum value from a situation where eagles want to trade out an older player for picks. Again I’m not saying you should be letting him go for unders, but just be honest about the reality of the situation.

Of course eagles can do nothing and I’m sure you’ll enjoy a demons/Carlton esque 10 year rebuild when Tassie come into the comp and soak up all of the talent your club is crying out for.

Show me the direct post where I am lying.

 

[HR Roughnstuf]

At this price WC should reneg on the deal to get Baker.

They already have form reneging on deals with players with 3 years left on their contract

 

[amazingjoshy]

Of course eagles can do nothing and I’m sure you’ll enjoy a demons/Carlton esque 10 year rebuild when Tassie come into the comp and soak up all of the talent your club is crying out for.

I'm sure the one mid teen pick that you guys think he's worth is going to save us

 

[bzparkes]

At this price WC should reneg on the deal to get Baker.

They already have form reneging on deals with players with 3 years left on their contract

Here ya go champ, because you're clearly having a hard time understand its implications:

Definition of CONTRACT

a binding agreement between two or more persons or parties; especially : one legally enforceable; a business arrangement for the supply of goods or services at a fixed price; the act of marriage or an agreement to marry… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

 

[VicBased]

I wish she was , She was a great cook and no longer with us but anyway

You are probably half my age so maybe go ask your mum to get you something to eat

Like a good little boy

Sorry to hear that. Apologies if I offended you.

 

[THE_GUN]

Sorry to hear that. Apologies if I offended you.

Not at all , Your a nice kid
Play on

 

[HR Roughnstuf]

Here ya go champ, because you're clearly having a hard time understand its implications:

Definition of CONTRACT

a binding agreement between two or more persons or parties; especially : one legally enforceable; a business arrangement for the supply of goods or services at a fixed price; the act of marriage or an agreement to marry… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

You might wanna read that CHAMP.

 

[excitingnews]

Unreasonable to ask for overs for a contracted player you want to keep.....

Hawks fans are hilarious

We did improve his current contract, he just wants the bigger $$$ Hawthorn have promised him

If you truly valued him more than potential draft picks you would have matched our offer and kept him happy.

As previously stated, you are lying about this being entirely driven by the hawks.

You’re coming off a 4 win season, just accept that you’re doing what most rebuilding clubs do and trading out a player who won’t be there for your next flag tilt.

 

[bzparkes]

If you truly valued him more than potential draft picks you would have matched our offer and kept him happy.

As previously stated, you are lying about this being entirely driven by the hawks.

You’re coming off a 4 win season, just accept that you’re doing what most rebuilding clubs do and trading out a player who won’t be there for your next flag tilt.

So, you're calling me a liar yet can't provide a post where I've actually lied?

About you **** right off from this thread, as it appears to much for your feeble brain to handle?

 

[excitingnews]

So, you're calling me a liar yet can't provide a post where I've actually lied?

About you **** right off from this thread, as it appears to much for your feeble brain to handle?

I replied to the post you lied in and explained it, get a grip.

I do think everyone really appreciates you being the barrass trade thread hall monitor though, so thanks

 

[bzparkes]

I replied to the post you lied in and explained it, get a grip.

I do think everyone really appreciates you being the barrass trade thread hall monitor though, so thanks

Show me how anything I've said is a lie?

Oh, you can't. Because nothing I've said is untrue.

Time for you to take a break, it seems.

 

[Julia#13]

Hawks future 1st and 3rd for Syd 19 and 22. Would WC take 19 and 22 for Barass?

 

[Lyyynnnchy]

Hawks future 1st and 3rd for Syd 19 and 22. Would WC take 19 and 22 for Barass?

I would begrudgingly

 

[stallon]

Hawks future 1st and 3rd for Syd 19 and 22. Would WC take 19 and 22 for Barass?

Not enough from the Hawks.
Swans are offering 19+22 for 13, Hawks are also offering f1+f2 for 13
Hawks have one of the worst offers for 13, Swans one of the best

Hawks would have to give up at least f1+f2 for the 2 swans picks(maybe a touch more?)

I think the Eagles would take those 2 picks, and send one of them to Richmond for Baker.
Not really an ideal deal at all, I still want more than just the original pick 14 that the Hawks offered(which is their f1+f2)

19+22+another future 2nd or 3rd rounder for points

 

[Ashman23]

Not enough from the Hawks.
Swans are offering 19+22 for 13, Hawks are also offering f1+f2 for 13
Hawks have one of the worst offers for 13, Swans one of the best

Hawks would have to give up at least f1+f2 for the 2 swans picks(maybe a touch more?)

I think the Eagles would take those 2 picks, and send one of them to Richmond for Baker.
Not really an ideal deal at all, I still want more than just the original pick 14 that the Hawks offered(which is their f1+f2)

19+22+another future 2nd or 3rd rounder for points

Yeah the Hawks need to add a kidney and their first born according to Stallon.

 

[stallon]

Yeah the Hawks need to add a kidney and their first born according to Stallon.

What?
Did I say something you disagree with?

Point out where in my working out I was wrong please

 

[HairyO]

Hawks future 1st and 3rd for Syd 19 and 22. Would WC take 19 and 22 for Barass?

Effectively 2 end of 1st round picks for a 29 year old. Feels like a LOT. Its also hard to know what happens with those picks given clubs who will be matching bids are still messing around with their trades.

 

[HR Roughnstuf]

What?
Did I say something you disagree with?

Point out where in my working out I was wrong please

Easy.

A single pick around 19/22 is what Barrass is worth

 

[ghostbat12]

Easy.

A single pick around 19/22 is what Barrass is worth

Not to us. And since he is contracted and you courted him, that’s your problem.

 

[stallon]

Easy.

A single pick around 19/22 is what Barrass is worth

I was giving a serious answer, but clowns are going to be clowns I guess

 

[Julia#13]

Effectively 2 end of 1st round picks for a 29 year old. Feels like a LOT. Its also hard to know what happens with those picks given clubs who will be matching bids are still messing around with their trades.

After trading 14, you still get end up with F1, F2 and F2. Essentially only giving 1 first rounder going back to it. I'd say that's pretty good for you guys. 19 goes to Rich for Baker. Everybody wins.

 

[HR Roughnstuf]

Not to us. And since he is contracted and you courted him, that’s your problem.

And you pushed him out reneging on handshake deals. WC’s problem, Hawks don’t need to do anything

 

[ghostbat12]

And you pushed him out reneging on handshake deals. WC’s problem, Hawks don’t need to do anything

Provide evidence he was pushed out at all. He was offered an improved contract. He declined and asked for a trade.

Nowhere has barrass been told we want to trade him against his will.

He did it last year, he did it this year. It’s all on Barrass and it’s on Barrass to accept it.

 

[new breed]

Eagles not going to give Barrass up without good compensation for a required , contracted player .

 

[HeHateMe]

I don't think it will but if it did do WC and Hawthorn have a plan B if this trade falls through. From Hawthorn there's whispers and murmurs but publicly the club has said the only business will be Barrass.