He's already worth an early 2nd, borderline early first, to make that 100% worth it for a club paying a wage would suit, especially a team like Collingwood.The whole ‘paying a portion of the wage’ to get a first round pick is a misnomer IMO. Reality is Mitchell has a contract with one year remaining. So as I see it, there a three options for team potentially trading for Mitchell:
1. A team trades for him knowing it’ll only be for a year (unlikely you’d assume). If so, no one is giving a high pick for a one year rental.
2. A team trades for him knowing that it’ll have negotiate an extension/ new contract through the year (also unlikely you’d assume). If so, no one is giving a high pick for him with such risk attached.
3. A team trades for Mitchell with an extension agreement in place (overwhelming likelihood). If so, the team can spread the impact of his final year of the current contract over the additional years of the extension so the financial hit year 1 isn’t as bad. This would mean that the incentive to give up a high pick in the scenario that Hawks pay a hefty part of his wage is diluted.
I also don’t think that there will be a competitive market at all. Teams either don’t need him (Melbourne, Sydney, Geelong) or have other options ahead of him you’d say (Geelong, Richmond, Carlton, Collingwood). Can’t see a team bidding against themselves to give up a high pick if they’re the only team that want his services.
But also if it's not wage, it could always be sending back or shuffling of late picks.