monfries_young-gun
Senior List
id have to say saints would be ahead by a fair bit:
Milne - Gehrig - ??
Hamill - Riewoldt - Harvey
Milne - Gehrig - ??
Hamill - Riewoldt - Harvey
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Cuzz09 said:Here we go again! - You must have been waiting for an eagles fan to pop up hey!
Our forward line is not as bad as everyone thinks - I mean for how good Sydney's is they only kicked 1 more goal in the GF.
Oh well - have fun
Johnson#26 said:St.Kilda, Collingwood, Sydney.
It may look biased, but it ain't:
HF: Caracella, Rocca, Rusling/Didak - Didak hopefully in the midfield)
FF: T.Cloke, Tarrant, Fraser - Richards in the ruck.
May be a little top heavy, but, if these guys get going, we are going to kick some huge scores.
And there is a bloke called Buckley who is pretty handy as well...
doppleganger said:st.kilda is miles ahead of the rest
three top grade talls
gehrig, reiwoldt & hamill
best small in the game, milne
kosi can push forward and dominate too!!
sydney,
apart from hall do they actually have another key position forward??
they have three top notch flankers in
o'loughlin, n.davis & o'keefe
not the best structure tho
essendon does look good
two awesome key position = lloyd & lucas
hird
small in lovett pretty dangerous
freo could be anything
two great kp's = pavlich & mcpharlin
smalls, farmer & medhurst
pies is a bit different in my view
one true kp = rocca
best hff in the game = tarrant
caracella is as dangerous a mid sized finisher going around
buckley playing forward, who would play on him?? the best defender ie scarlett, basset types would have to u would think
that frees up t.cloke or j.fraser to get the fourth best backmen, instead of the number one or two like t.cloke had to deal with this year
s.rusling is the quickest player in the league, and he is tall and a decent mark, he could be anything but i wouldn't hold hope for much from him next year!
my ranks
1. st.kilda
2. collingwood
3. essendon
yes they would, 95% of non collingwood supporters will always go against collingwood no matter what is asked!!lazy said:Collingwood at no. 2 is just laughable - I would think that 95% of non-Collingwood supporters would choose the Sydney forward line with our 'top notch flankers' any day of the week.
doppleganger said:yes they would, 95% of non collingwood supporters will always go against collingwood no matter what is asked!!
ie people trying to suggest that the altitude training is ridiculous!!
key position forwards are the most important, st.kilda has 3or4 if include kosi
sydney only has 1, b.hall
essendon & freo have 2, most would count tazza as a key forward, (i dont) so pies2
structually all those teams are better off than sydney
hall > roccalazy said:I would choose Micky over anyone from the Pies you would put up as your second KPP. And Okeefe is better than or at least equal to Tarrant (They at least play the same role)
So lets look at it -
Hall > Rocca
Micky > Cloke
Okeefe > or at least = Tarrant
Davis > Caracella or Didak
doppleganger said:hall > rocca
tarrant > o'keefe
buckley > o'loughlin
didak = n.davis, think you forget that he played with the pies, was also given a huge rocket by roos due to poor form, yes has all the talent in the world but still hasn't done much apart from that brilliant last quarter against the cats
so that leaves
carracella, t.cloke & j.fraser
next
doppleganger said:hall > rocca
tarrant > o'keefe
buckley > o'loughlin
didak = n.davis, think you forget that he played with the pies, was also given a huge rocket by roos due to poor form, yes has all the talent in the world but still hasn't done much apart from that brilliant last quarter against the cats
so that leaves
carracella, t.cloke & j.fraser
next
If Beau comes good this year, or Cam Wood, I reckon Jamie Charman could be a semi permanent forward, or perhaps resting in t6he forward line after ruck duties with Clark, and Bradshaw can be more of a utility, plugging holes in the back line or up forward. Thoughts?king_Brown said:I like the look of our forward line at the moment
HFF:Corey CHF: Brown HFF:Brennan
FP:Merret FF: Bradshaw FP:McRath
with Akermanis, Voss, Charman, Keating, Sherman all spending time down there it actually looks quite decent. Not as intimedating without Lynchy sitting in the goal square but Merret will adapt to footy in the next couple of years (hopefully!!) and can be the permanent big target deep down forward with bradshaw rotating between the back and forward lines (depending where we need him ) and hopefully Brennan can recover from injury and return to his Round 1 2005 form against Saints
u did say 2006!lazy said:Sorry I didnt realise Buckley plays FF every week.
DST said:Yer, 1 more goal from 15 less inside 50's, go figure that!
With the amount of ball your midfield shoves down the forwards throats you should have kicked 10 more.
DST
nice one parrotparrot said:The Pies forward line would rank at about 12th in the comp.
Hall >>>> Rocca
Micky O >> Tarrant
Davis >>>>>>>>>>> Didak = very very ordinary
Buckley a forward?
T Cloke = promising
Fraser = very very very ordinary
Caracella = approaching retirement.
Not much to get excited about. Still yet to bottom out.
brisbane forward line can be awesome, but as you said need on eof ur talls to step in because bradshaw isn't suited as the second big body, he is perfect third tall tho!Helix said:If Beau comes good this year, or Cam Wood, I reckon Jamie Charman could be a semi permanent forward, or perhaps resting in t6he forward line after ruck duties with Clark, and Bradshaw can be more of a utility, plugging holes in the back line or up forward. Thoughts?
Helix said:If Beau comes good this year, or Cam Wood, I reckon Jamie Charman could be a semi permanent forward, or perhaps resting in t6he forward line after ruck duties with Clark, and Bradshaw can be more of a utility, plugging holes in the back line or up forward. Thoughts?
doppleganger said:....n.davis has done less than didak has, except for 1 quarter against the cats......
Didak should be played in the midfield....parrot said:Um....didn't Davis just win a final off his own boot. Comparing Didak to Davis is just silly. Davis is a proven match-winner, Didak is rock-solid ordinary, lucky not to be delisted last year. No-one would want Didak over Davis - apart from you of course. BTW Fraser is terrible, and most Pie fans would concur I suspect.
king_Brown said:Didak should be played in the midfield....
would give you some more pace
didak won the 03 QF final off his own boot!parrot said:Um....didn't Davis just win a final off his own boot. Comparing Didak to Davis is just silly. Davis is a proven match-winner, Didak is rock-solid ordinary, lucky not to be delisted last year. No-one would want Didak over Davis - apart from you of course. BTW Fraser is terrible, and most Pie fans would concur I suspect.
that is where i want him to be playedking_Brown said:Didak should be played in the midfield....
would give you some more pace
didak kicking style is used on an insturctional video when showing young kids how to kick properly, one of the best kicks in the league!campbell said:They are all going to be faster and fitter cause they have the high alt training and room.Money can't buy skills though.