Current Trial Toyah Cordingley * Murder Trial of Rajwinder Singh

[BFew]

they had locals take dna tests as they had a sample taken from her with unknown DNA Which clearly matchs singh.

Hey madjoe

What happened to your game, set and clearly perfect match?

 

[BomberManU]

Singh said he saw two men ....

“There were two killers and two victims.”

 

[Dockers2024]

Geez this poor girl didn’t know what she might be getting involved with (TF.)

 

[Dockers2024]

“There were two killers and two victims.”

 

[Dockers2024]

Unfortunately for the perpetrators the police know what they are doing. Blatantly obvious from early on who committed this crime . Police will hold off making arrest until case is watertight Indian fellow was a witness and then threatened by perpetrators Without his statement there is doubt and no eyewitness statement on accomplice Indian bloke had to be charged to get him to Australia to make statement Police privately assuring him of a positive outcome but also for his safety need to continue Indian bloke murder charge narrative to keepi perpetrators comfortable and in dark Story given by ex absolute BS I believe they avoided public by driving off best tracks between spring falls and wangetti avoiding cook highway losing dog for hours yeah sure in the middle of nowhere how convenient and ridiculous given experience I believe with dogs Toyahs dog tied up doubtful Indian blokes work So many questions re ex piss poor alibi story Says found car unlocked so clearly some random person stole belongings not ex looking for dog for hours hey ex spent far more time looking for dog than girlfriend holding off calling cops without looking sus not normal behaviour I reckon Indian bloke publicly looking like things are grim privately probably in 5 star accomodation with ample protection

 

[Kurve]

Unfortunately for the perpetrators the police know what they are doing. Blatantly obvious from early on who committed this crime . Police will hold off making arrest until case is watertight Indian fellow was a witness and then threatened by perpetrators Without his statement there is doubt and no eyewitness statement on accomplice Indian bloke had to be charged to get him to Australia to make statement Police privately assuring him of a positive outcome but also for his safety need to continue Indian bloke murder charge narrative to keepi perpetrators comfortable and in dark Story given by ex absolute BS I believe they avoided public by driving off best tracks between spring falls and wangetti avoiding cook highway losing dog for hours yeah sure in the middle of nowhere how convenient and ridiculous given experience I believe with dogs Toyahs dog tied up doubtful Indian blokes work So many questions re ex piss poor alibi story Says found car unlocked so clearly some random person stole belongings not ex looking for dog for hours hey ex spent far more time looking for dog than girlfriend holding off calling cops without looking sus not normal behaviour I reckon Indian bloke publicly looking like things are grim privately probably in 5 star accomodation with ample protection

Singh is going to trial for the murder of Cordingley so the police are confident they have he right man, if it may appear his defence will put up a fight to avoid conviction.

 

[craffles]

Singh is going to trial for the murder of Cordingley so the police are confident they have he right man, if it may appear his defence will put up a fight to avoid conviction.

Chief owes you more ad revenue for bringing randos onto Bigfooty.

#GiveKurveaPayrise
#CoughUpChief

 

[BFew]

There was some new news on this case on Monday that was not posted in here.

Some of you reading this are so 100% convinced on the sound-ness of the Police case to bring Singh to trial, that you might need a good lie down before and after you read the below.

No Cookies | The Cairns Post

No Cookies | The Cairns Post

www.cairnspost.com.au

'Cairns Supreme Court pre-trial hearing for murder accused Rajwinder Singh hears of mystery statement​

With the murder trial for the man accused of killing Toyah Cordingley drawing closer, his barrister has told Cairns Supreme Court police may have more evidence that has not been included in the prosecution’s brief of evidence.

Bronwyn Farr Senior Journalist
June 21, 2024 - 9:22AM
...
his barrister claims there may be evidence linked to the last person who saw her alive.

Speaking at a pre-trial hearing before Justice James Henry in Cairns Supreme Court on Thursday, Angus Edwards KC said his instructing solicitors found out from a member of the media there was apparently a statement made by someone who was possibly the last person to see Ms Cordingley alive.
...
“We found out there was a statement we had not been provided with, had not seen and were not told about it,” Mr Edwards told the court.

He said it did not form part of the brief of evidence the prosecution had provided Mr Singh’s legal team.

“We have concerns there may be additional material we have not been provided with … we have subpoenaed the media person in relation to the document they may have,” Mr Edwards said.

He said there was allegedly a statement from a person who saw Ms Cordingley walking on the beach with a man walking behind her, at 2.30pm, not long before she sent what would be her final text message, to her boyfriend Marco Heidenreich, at 3.17pm.

Mr Edwards said he wanted a further pre-trial hearing – known as a Basha inquiry – to cross examine three police officers.

“We want to know what material is outstanding, we don’t want to be left in the dark until matters are disclosed by the media to us,” Mr Edwards said.

He told the court he wanted to interview five police officers, but the crown sought stronger reasons to interview the latter two.

He said the latter pair had not provided statements but were “leaders working in the background, directing things”.

Justice Henry stated the Basha was in order to properly test if there existed any further material.

“There are some signs there were recordings with other people not disclosed, some suggestion not all CCTV or Dashcam footage has been disclosed,” Mr Edwards said.

Mr Edwards said he wanted to cross-examine the officer who took the statement that was missing from the material.

“Another police officer made inquiries in relation to a potential other person who may have been involved in the killing, we want to make inquiries of him, where that went, what happened in relation to that.

“It’s a very loose end, we don’t know what is going to come out of that,” Mr Edwards said.

He said the defence was still working to proceed to trial on the set date of July 22.

Crown prosecutor Nathan Crane said he consented to the Basha.

Justice Henry set the date for a further pre-trial hearing for July 18 at 1.30pm.'

 

[BFew]

In NSW, on the obligations of the prosecution and police to disclose evidence and relevant material to a case, there is the below.

Does anyone know if the same applies in QLD?

The Prosecution's Duty To Disclose Evidence on the Defence

The prosecution is required to serve all relevant evidence on the defence.

www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au

'...​

The Duty of Disclosure​

NSW prosecution guidelines outline that prosecutors are under a continuous obligation to fully disclose to the defence all material known to them in a timely manner, that:

• Is relevant or possibly relevant to an issue in the case;
• Raises or possibly raises a new issue that is not apparent from the evidence the prosecution proposes to rely on;
• Holds out a real as opposed to fanciful prospect of providing a lead to evidence that goes to either of the previous two situations.

The prosecution’s duty of disclosure continues after trial as well as the conclusion of any appeal.

Police and other investigative agencies are also under a continuous duty to disclose relevant material to the NSW ODPP, so that they can appraise the material and disclose to the defence if suitable.
...'

 

[BomberManU]

Wow, this is potentially getting very messy. It would seem logical that the person seen walking behind TC wasn't Singh, there would be no reason not to include that as evidence, right?? The alternative beggars belief.

 

[BFew]

there was allegedly a statement from a person who saw Ms Cordingley walking on the beach with a man walking behind her, at 2.30pm, not long before she sent what would be her final text message, to her boyfriend Marco Heidenreich, at 3.17pm.

I wonder when this alleged statement, and Police (AFPl/State) and QLD DPP knowledge that where was a further witness at the crime scene, was made to Police and/or media, in relation to the timing of the legal process to extradite Singh from India to Australia, and the payment of the AUD$1m reward money?

 

[BFew]

It would seem logical that the person seen walking behind TC wasn't Singh, there would be no reason not to include that as evidence, right??

Depends who the person allegedly walking behind Toyah was.

Maybe revealing who this person was, might have risked compromising some other criminal investigation (Australian or International), related to some serious crimes and an ongoing operation or that Police or other LE (State/AFP/Other/International) Taskforce or operation.

Possibly something drug, organised crime, or child pr0n/sexual abuse/pedo related.

 

[Kurve]

What's happened is awful but at the same time, it's going to be really interesting to see how this trial plays out.

Shouild be a busier thread.

 

[Dockers2024]

Oh geez I thought it was an article on here. I’ll have a look but was in the pre trial.

Walking around the bush in middle of nowhere no one around looking for missing dog for hours at the same time his soon to be ex was murdered great story so he thought Absolute BS

 

[Dockers2024]

Really sus. I’ve never quite got the bit about TC’s dog tied up close to her neither instead of him being loose. Just another way for them to easily find her and if they tied him up because they thought he’d be vicious I’d think they would have been too scared to go near him and tie him up. It’s all bizarre.

Bf would have no trouble tying dog up Highly unlikely unlikely Indian bloke would do this

 

[Dockers2024]

There is a hell of a lot of doubt around this case. We need to see the evidence on Singh first, of course.

No doubt Singh innocent BF not so

 

[Underarrest_]

Walking around the bush in middle of nowhere no one around looking for missing dog for hours at the same time his soon to be ex was murdered great story so he thought Absolute BS

Agree, very strange.
This brings me to the question of why police extradited Singh when they don’t even have DNA evidence on him.

 

[BFew]

the question of why police extradited Singh when they don’t even have DNA evidence on him.

For completeness, here's screenshots of the two early June Cairns Post articles related to the DNA evidence, as one of them i had not quoted/linked in this thread.

4 June 2024 (p7)



5 June 2024 (p3)

 

[Underarrest_]

For completeness, here's screenshots of the two early June Cairns Post articles related to the DNA evidence, as one of them i had not quoted/linked in this thread.

4 June 2024 (p7)

View attachment 2040605

5 June 2024 (p3)

View attachment 2040615

How could two reports be so different?
Singh said there were two offenders and two victims.
Wouldn’t he have seen the two offenders?

 

[BomberManU]

IF Singh had nothing to do with it, any theories on why he would leave the country?
Apart from the DNA in question, they also made vague reference to phone evidence - their phones were 'in proximity' of each other. They haven't elaborated on that, that I can see, but I wonder how close 'in proximity' is?

 

[Underarrest_]

IF Singh had nothing to do with it, any theories on why he would leave the country?
Apart from the DNA in question, they also made vague reference to phone evidence - their phones were 'in proximity' of each other. They haven't elaborated on that, that I can see, but I wonder how close 'in proximity' is?

Good question.
There was some mention earlier on about some items being found near Lake Placid (I think it was) which would have been in Singh’s path going home.
Could Singh have been a part of this crime in connection with someone else?
We know the BF had a motive and we know the guy she started seeing was a sicko. It’s anyone’s guess.

 

[BomberManU]

Good question.
There was some mention earlier on about some items being found near Lake Placid (I think it was) which would have been in Singh’s path going home.
Could Singh have been a part of this crime in connection with someone else?
We know the BF had a motive and we know the guy she started seeing was a sicko. It’s anyone’s guess.

Guy she was seeing was on a flight at the time, I think??

 

[faible]

IF Singh had nothing to do with it, any theories on why he would leave the country?
Apart from the DNA in question, they also made vague reference to phone evidence - their phones were 'in proximity' of each other. They haven't elaborated on that, that I can see, but I wonder how close 'in proximity' is?

My assumption is they were pinging off the same cell tower(s) at the same time.

With all the weird shit about the BF that has come out I do wonder whether Singh was more 'scared witness' than murderer.

 

[Underarrest_]

Guy she was seeing was on a flight at the time, I think??

I think he was on a flight that day, but does he or the BF know Singh?
Will be interesting what Singh has to say about how he became a victim in a murder that according to him, he wasn’t involved in and had to leave the country/job/family and disappear.

 

[BomberManU]

I think he was on a flight that day, but does he or the BF know Singh?
Will be interesting what Singh has to say about how he became a victim in a murder that according to him, he wasn’t involved in and had to leave the country/job/family and disappear.

Yeah, it's all very strange. If the BF was involved and Singh is innocent, he must at least know who Singh is - why would he need to leave the country otherwise? Not saying this is the case, but no matter which way you look at it, there are some odd circumstances.