- Oct 8, 2004
- 1,827
- 3,008
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- COLLINGWOOD
Equivalent stopping power with better disposal.
and quicker.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Equivalent stopping power with better disposal.
I still think his greatest trick was landing Claudia Schiffer.
All of them except for the ability to make the ball travel higher in the air than in length. I mean, Dunn could probably do that also but he has the choice not to.On what measure?
Dunn doesn't have equivalent stopping power to N.Brown, lacks the height and strength. That's becoming less important though and moving the ball from defence more so, which is why I'd agree he is now a better player than Brown.Equivalent stopping power with better disposal.
You never know how they rate our players, they took Seedsman for a pick many didn't think he was worth for example.
Your or my opinion for that matter of players doesn't always marry up with clubs ratings. If it did we wouldn't have the likes of Blair, Mayne and Oxley masquerading in black and white.
IF the Rumours are True and we are into Atkins and we get Him.
I doubt we Draft Copperfield as we got 2 similar types in Atkins and Murray
Troll AFL Trade Account
Pretty sure that 1v1 Dunn was something like number 2 in the league this year, so I’d say his stopping power is easily as good. He’s shorter but certainly not weaker. One of the strongest guys going around. There’s a reason he was being played on guys like Hawkins this year.Dunn doesn't have equivalent stopping power to N.Brown, lacks the height and strength. That's becoming less important though and moving the ball from defence more so, which is why I'd agree he is now a better player than Brown.
Lets be honest ladies and gents... would it be a trade period without Oxley being offered in an unrealistic trace scenario?
Who the F is CopperfieldIF the Rumours are True and we are into Atkins and we get Him.
I doubt we Draft Copperfield as we got 2 similar types in Atkins and Murray
On what measure?
Who the F is Copperfield
Poy contenderAll of them except for the ability to make the ball travel higher in the air than in length. I mean, Dunn could probably do that also but he has the choice not to.
Are you sure about Dunn's stopping power?Dunn doesn't have equivalent stopping power to N.Brown, lacks the height and strength. That's becoming less important though and moving the ball from defence more so, which is why I'd agree he is now a better player than Brown.
Are you sure about Dunn's stopping power?
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...e/news-story/19f92b904e197e75ee1db3217122cc1e
It was mentioned much during the home and away that we were looking at him. Might be a little more than just a rumour.Troll AFL Trade Account
Best available for me with pick 6. Irrespective of needs, and that’s what they’ll do.Or Carlton took Kane Lucas the best available or Talia. There are plenty of examples either way as drafting is not an exact science but we need the tall so we have to take it
Yes. Do you rate Dunn as a better stopper than Rance? Said this a few times, but the game has changed stopping is not what it was.Are you sure about Dunn's stopping power?
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...e/news-story/19f92b904e197e75ee1db3217122cc1e
Who the F is Copperfield
Both great but believe it from an eye witness of his games from the very first - Daicos was not simply a class above he was in a different category.Leon and Dids weren't bad.
Drafting on a needs bases won us our last flag. We identified in 05 we needed mids and took Pendlebury and Thomas and the next year we identified we needed talls and took Brown and Reid. All four went on to be premiership players. We could have taken the mids again in 06 over the talls but ultimately that would of cost us. It's a necessity we re-build our spine and we have to use pick 6 on the best available KP prospectThe argument for best available is that if you nail your pick, you end up with a 15 year player who plays most of his career with a list that looks nothing like our current list - a list with totally different needs, thus you shouldn't draft for immediate needs.
That must be why Adelaide had the highest scoring forward line for the season because talls are obsoleteDon't go all KB on me, Seeds.
The spine in terms of the CHB and CHF doesn't apply. It's more about the right mix of talls etc to suit a plan. If the dominant CHF makes a comeback, we can start talking spines again.
When watching the 76 GF the other night, the spine was definitely in play because kicks from HB were bombed to CHF a lot. Nowadays, with constant run and carry, zig zagging and lateral kicks, more overlap etc, the spine is obsolete.