Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Jezza is rolled gold. But he's not who I'd chase.
I'd want the second wing spot sorted out first. I'd seriously go hard at Mcluggage ahead of Jezza.
And a w***er of the highest order. Good player but his shit don’t stinkDon't want Jezza. Finals chocker of the highest order
Doubt we'd even get Jezza anyway. As much as we have cap space, we aren't throwing a million at another key forward. Apparently Cats and Hawks are setting up to take shot at him as well. Seems he would pick a team like them ahead of us not matter what we offer, he seems like that type who'd chase one of the "big" clubs.
Article just released by the age stating the dogs are holding firm that 32 is enough for Bruce and that pick 45 or 51 is enough for keath.
Adelaide have tried to argue that they should get what we got for Adams but as the article points out Adams was contracted and a year younger
Like I was saying on the Adelaide board, situation with Keath and Greenwood is a little different. They’re not Free Agents, they’re just uncontracted, It’s not a ‘choose to match our contract offer right now, or he goes’ scenario, Crows still have the ability to up their contract length of the right value trade doesn’t work out.
Both Keath and Greenwood were satisfied with the $$ offers they got, it was only the length of contract that was the sticking point (this is actual verifiable info, not BF heresay) Some of the players who’ve left this year were either getting on too old, or were disgruntled, neither of these two lads were.
A lot of Crows supporters on our page are happy for Reid to go back to both those boys and offer them the extra year and a few extra $$ if the right trade can’t be sorted by close of business Wednesday, seeing as our cap space will be freed up by a few million either way.
We waited a year too late for for Gibbs and still coughed up 2 x 1st rounders for a 29 year old!. Keath is late to the game so should still have 4-5 good years in him. P50 is way off the mark, and I have a feeling both parties aren’t going to get this one done. Saints might also be holding you for random with Bruce for one of our higher picks in the 20’s instead of your 30’s, especially if they need to give up a higher pick for one of these players that have nominated them.
Going to be an interesting few days!
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Pick 45 is entirely unreasonable for Keath for mine.
He’s a proven, mature, athletic, skilled CHB. He’s more in line with pick 32 in my view.
Pick 45 is entirely unreasonable for Keath for mine.
He’s a proven, mature, athletic, skilled CHB. He’s more in line with pick 32 in my view.
Definitely a bit of posturing from usI wonder if our "interest" in B.King has been leaked as part of our shenanigans over Bruce with St Kilda. If you don't trade us Bruce, we'll be after B.King...
Given their relative price tags at the trade table, the fact we've got Naughton (and JU-H) and our aim to bring in experienced talls, I'd say Bruce is the better fit for our list.
On moto g(6) play using BigFooty.com mobile app
Seems to be something that a poorly run club would do. Too many cooksWord I’ve heard from someone at a club other than the Saints is that the Saints have had a few different officials making promises to different players to get them to commit, but they’re going to have a really hard time fitting them all in now that they have.
Gubby, Lethlean and Gallagher may have all done a little bit of their own thing.
Surely the plan is still to upgrade our earlier picks using those later thirds?The age saying we ain’t budging on pick 32 for Bruce and saints want more. Adelaide want more for Keath than 45 as well.
This will get done but we will need to add some sweetneers. Obviously our other 2 3rd will have to go as well.
Article just released by the age stating the dogs are holding firm that 32 is enough for Bruce and that pick 45 or 51 is enough for keath.
Adelaide have tried to argue that they should get what we got for Adams but as the article points out Adams was contracted and a year younger
Adams also had a better track record of performance, despite his awful injury historyArticle just released by the age stating the dogs are holding firm that 32 is enough for Bruce and that pick 45 or 51 is enough for keath.
Adelaide have tried to argue that they should get what we got for Adams but as the article points out Adams was contracted and a year younger