threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
It goes both ways though - Melbourne can look to rebuild from their current disaster by plopping gun players like Petracca and Pickett on the field last year because Melbourne secured them with long-term contracts, and be in a better position to dig themselves out with players like them there. Both wanted out, but as players, they can't have it both ways - their own security of well-paid long-term contracts if their own form falls away, they wouldn't accept the club asking them to be paid less, so they can hardly go to the club and say the club's "form" of sorts has also fallen.Think it’s silly how players can requests trades while in contract in return for longer / better contracts. The only reasons contracts should be able to be broken by the player is if there has been a problem that can’t be resolved, a family matter meaning players need to move, a dispute about roles, etc.
I think the AFL should bring in a rule that no player trades can happen while under contract where the value of the contract is greater in $ value or term to the remaining contract at the incumbent club.
Barrass is a perfect example…….mate you signed the contract. If you want to move back to Melbourne for legit reasons that’s fair enough but the terms you move on can’t be better than the terms you’ve signed up for with your existing club.