Strategy Trade and List Management Thread Part 7 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

You missed my point mate. Do your homework, nobody will want someone who should be on 3 strikes. Not disputing his talent.

Huge risk but huge reward if another club comes for him.

Clubs know exactly what the JUH scenario is.

They will want to make sure that he gets his act together before entertaining a trade and that will take some convincing for him and this is only IF he cuts ties with the Dogs.

Hopefully he sorts himself out for himself not anyone else.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If JUH leaves at least he is contracted this year. Swans would have to give whatever they get for chad warner and extras. However I don't think he will go anywhere as by the time the season is over he wont have Sniff in his ear as much as he would have when he was at the dogs so hopefully once he's sorted his issues out he'll probably lose some of those habits he got off him.
 
Is Bard Scott a modern-day Shakespeare?
Wrong bard.

It’s the Scots bard’s birthday in half an hour.

He may or may not have said: “Here’s tae us, whaur’s like us, damned few and they’re all dead”
🥃🥃
 
Do we pay our young starts too much too early, going on potential. That's what a small club probably has to do but might be a link with the amount of pressure added to them. Naughts, JUH, Bailey Smith, Tom Boyd, maybe others' pay didn't match their output. You look at Richards who has had a steady improvement without the big $ and pressure. Now he is a good age can probably handle a big pay check and pressure to perform. He probably deserves it more that those at similar stages
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Strategy Trade and List Management Thread Part 7 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top