Too old, need a guy who can come up with the rest of our players.
Who do you suggest? Youth isn't a substitute for skill.
Free 29 year old elite inside mid isn't a bad option surely.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Too old, need a guy who can come up with the rest of our players.
Hes not eliteWho do you suggest? Youth isn't a substitute for skill.
Free 29 year old elite inside mid isn't a bad option surely.
They may be uncontracted, but if an offer's on the table they haven't been delisted.Would think guys like Richards and Barlow get picked up in the DFA trading period before the PSD
What are you insinuating?The AFL bangs on about integrity constantly but what happened in this draft is WWE stuff.
For Carlton to give up a second rounder to get 3 late picks is nonsense and screams manipulation of sorts. Nothing will come of it but needs a thorough investigation.
The St Kilda deal needs looking at also. According to most scouts one of the best and deepest drafts yet they give up Pick 10 to check mate GC and help Hawthorn out.
The fact that Omeara wasn't even talking to us in the last week means we were never anywhere near consideration at any point in any time. Just a sideshow. Was pretty obvious all the way through.
You seriously think St Kilda got the short end of the stick on that one?The St Kilda deal needs looking at also. According to most scouts one of the best and deepest drafts yet they give up Pick 10 to check mate GC and help Hawthorn out.
Hes not elite
The St Kilda deal needs looking at also. According to most scouts one of the best and deepest drafts yet they give up Pick 10 to check mate GC and help Hawthorn out.
100%. Big fan of hisLarkey doesn't get enough love.
Would have been really nice to have someone like him in the VFL this year
Personally I expected a bit more to happen.
- Not sure why we didn't get Melbourne's future 2nd and dangled that in front of the expansion clubs with 41 to get a better pick this year
- I thought there were big opportunities to try and get a strong hand in the top end of this draft having 1 and 20
- one other GWS kid like Pickett could have addressed our small forward needs
Easy to say it I guess when you are not in that position making the call. But we really needed to make some moves.
Don't clubs have to the end of the month to either re-sign them or delist them?They may be uncontracted, but if an offer's on the table they haven't been delisted.
Why would a team delist an elite player then?Depends on your definition so I clearly disagree on this. When he plays inside mid he is elite in that role.
Players only become DFAs if actively delisted (as in, a club refuses to offer them a contract). If the player refuses to sign an offered contract, then unless they qualify as an RFA or UFA through 8+ years of service, their only other option is to enter the draft.Don't clubs have to the end of the month to either re-sign them or delist them?
Then there is the DFA trade period beforehand or am I getting it wrong?
Has Barlow been delisted?Why would a team delist an elite player then?
My Top 10 as of now is]
when you look at the draft now, it's a tough prediction on who takes who.
There are a lot of Non vic picks in the top 20 and I imagine some nervous clubs wondering about go home factors
If we take McGrath at 1, what are the next 9 picks in your view?
Wouldn't say he's elite anymore and he's never been all that skillful just a hard working inside bull, hasn't really been the same since his broken leg. Not whether it was Lyon playing him out of position this year but he looked very slow. We've already got enough issues with speed in the midfield as it is.Who do you suggest? Youth isn't a substitute for skill.
Free 29 year old elite inside mid isn't a bad option surely.
Think that's the case yes, pretty sure anyone who isn't signed as of November 1st is fair game and counts as a DFA.Don't clubs have to the end of the month to either re-sign them or delist them?
Then there is the DFA trade period beforehand or am I getting it wrong?
Given the deal that was made, it's safe to assume 3 and 16 is what was on offer. Perhaps the club rates the capacity to take a McCluggage or McGrath over a four-pick upgrade.I thought there were big opportunities to try and get a strong hand in the top end of this draft having 1 and 20
The expansion clubs are now limited in how many picks they can use for points, and besides, already have plenty of both.Not sure why we didn't get Melbourne's future 2nd and dangled that in front of the expansion clubs with 41 to get a better pick this year
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 1 TO TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8 — NAB AFL delisted free agency period (1)
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10 TO THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 18 — NAB AFL delisted free agency period (2)
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 26 TO SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 27 — NAB AFL delisted free agency period (3)
FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 25 — NAB AFL National Draft
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 28 — NAB AFL Pre-Season and Rookie Drafts
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 30 — 2PM — Final AFL club list lodgement
Why would a team delist an elite player then?
A place for uncontracted players to go who wish to leave a club who wants to keep them? I'm glad, I'd prefer PSD the only option for these types (no ND). I think guys like Ball at pick 30 put a dampener on the draft. Imagine having Fyfe or Cameron being taken at pick 1 of a ND. I'd hate it. Top 40 odd should be kids. Leave old folks to PSD.with delisted free agency, what is the point of the PSD?
Changed to McLugg for for #1My Top 10 as of now is
1. Essendon - Hugh McCluggage
2. GWS - Andrew McGrath
Bid
3. Gold Coast - Jack Bowes
4. Brisbane - Ben Ainsworth
Bid
5. GWS - Will Setterfield
6. Carlton - Will Brodie
7. Gold Coast - Tim Taranto
8. Fremantle - Sam Petrevski- Seton
9. Gold Coast - Jack Scrimshaw
Bid
10. GWS - Harry Perryman
I also have 63 players being drafted and at the moment for us its
1. Hugh McCluggage
20. Josh Battle
29. Dylan Clarke
41. Corey Lyons
68. Nick Larkey
It isn't, or O'Meara would have just killed time until November 1st and signed as a DFA.Think that's the case yes, pretty sure anyone who isn't signed as of November 1st is fair game and counts as a DFA.
For all those players who don't qualify as DFAs. Of course, the national draft serves that purpose just fine.with delisted free agency, what is the point of the PSD?