List Mgmt. Trade & F/A - 2018/2019 - Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Honestly got donuts today on the Beams and Roughead fronts.

Hopefully we get these deals done early tomorrow, both deals are absolutely vital for us imo.

Roughead covers every key position on the field, even gives us flexibility for Mihocek. If we needed to throw checkers down back we’d have another option up forward if need be in Roughead. Very important deal for us.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Grain of salt due to the source but Ricky Nixon (recent tweet) reckons the Saints are sniffing around our young unsigned Josh Daicos. :thumbsdown:

Chicken has deduced that we are chasing a pick to include in Beams deal.
 
Grain of salt due to the source but Ricky Nixon (recent tweet) reckons the Saints are sniffing around our young unsigned Josh Daicos. :thumbsdown:

Chicken has deduced that we are chasing a pick to include in Beams deal.
He also said that Ess and Geel are going after Tyson Goldsack.

Bloke is an absolute idiot.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Ablett trade 2017 v Beams Trade 2018

This should be a closer comparison. Both in later stages of thier career. Both wanting to return under contract to former club.

Cats traded

1st pick (19), 2018 2nd round

Suns

Ablett, 2nd rd (24) 2018 Rd 4

On that basis how can Bears want 2 first rounders? Very lopsided.

*Ablett was older but a better player.
 
Free Kick Hawthorn get Scully today and most are saying it’s a bargain and even some say shady how they can get such a good player on the cheap.

If it was the Pies, would we be classed the same or would they (and us) be saying crap deal going after injured player again (eg Wells) and wtf are we doing?
 
I get the feeling my Sauce got it from someone in the media so they may already know it.

You got a feeling your source got it from someone in the media?

From your initial confidence I assumed you had direct contact with someone within a club.

Now your source suddenly sounds very far removed from any inside info.

If someone in the media had any indication this deal was a chance it would been posted on their twitter days ago. They don't wait for confirmation. And they certainly don't start spreading the info for someone else to scoop them.
 
You don't understand, like most, it has to be overs to get him.

We'll get a pick back from Brisbane.

No - it is you who doesn't understand that we need to not pay overs for a player we don't actually need. Just because Adelaide were stupid enough to do it that doesn't mean we should follow their lead.

The reality is that if we give them two first round picks for a 29 year old, including this year's pick in a super strong draft, then it will likey consign us to only matching bids for our two NGA players and not much else, when we could have potentially had another elite talent come into the club AND picked up Quaynor and Kelly.

We don't need Beams, but it looks like they do need that extra first round pick to make the Neale deal work. If they can make it work somehow without the extra first round pick then they will keep Beams anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top