Ben the Gooner
Stand by Hird
Very similar to my definition.
Could apply to players 16-22 in a team, who can't elavate themselves out of that group.
Seeing as Moloney will be in our best midfield, you've contradicted yourself. Again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Very similar to my definition.
Could apply to players 16-22 in a team, who can't elavate themselves out of that group.
Question
Caddy is unlikely - If we get a first rounder through drafting - Do we trade or go to the draft ?
Why would a player who is in your best 22 be a list clogger? If they were 20- 28 i'd understand but if there is no question if their in the best team or not, how are they then a list clogger?Very similar to my definition.
Could apply to players 16-22 in a team, who can't elavate themselves out of that group.
Ummm it hard to say if we could get away with just trading that pick i'd be all for it. But really why not back in our recruiters and keep getting young talent in(Not that caddy isn't young but u know what i mean).Question
Caddy is unlikely - If we get a first rounder through drafting - Do we trade or go to the draft ?
Seeing as Moloney will be in our best midfield, you've contradicted yourself. Again.
Its interesting that one i mean we will never know but it would be interesting to see who we would have taken if caddy was still there.I'd go Caddy. We identified him as a better prospect than Heppell pre-draft, and it's only because Heppell has performed beyond our wildest dreams that we've changed that view.
How would you know whether we thought Caddy would be a better prospect than Heppell, we were planning to take Caddy but we never expected Heppell to slide.I'd go Caddy. We identified him as a better prospect than Heppell pre-draft, and it's only because Heppell has performed beyond our wildest dreams that we've changed that view.
But you must admit Yaco when u fall out with a coach your in a lot of trouble eg Watson and Hille with Sheedy in fact a lot of players and Sheedy!!!!Moloney spent half the time at Casey and I think EfC's midfield is better than Melbourne's.
I am unsure how much his form dropped off - But I know that Neeld places a premium on defensive accountability
Not-enough-dash's-in-this-thread
First rounder - Got to the draft.
Horlin-Smith
I can reveal who Richmond's first round pick will be next year.
I will reveal how I know after the draft has taken place!
Ooooh-eeee-oooh!
Stick with the kid, baby!
Cough cough
I revealed it last Monday to one of your own posters who asked me via PM I'll let him verify that I did.Reveal your sorcery, sir!
One Stevens isn't that good i'd prefer NLM getting a game, secondly he is only worth a 3rd rounder not pears plus a 2nd or gumby and pears i'd maybe do a straight swap for reimers but thats it and lastly have you ever seen him play? He isn't that good.Would Koby Stevens be an easier option than Caddy? Around the same age (koby a bit older) both hard bodied mids and have similar attributes. Question is what could we offer WC to make this happen? Gumby, Pears, Reimers or package 2 of the 3? maybe even our second rounder and one of those 3 players?
Thoughts?
Imagine these acquisitions
B Goddard
B Moloney
K Stevens
J Daniher
I revealed it last Monday to one of your own posters who asked me via PM I'll let him verify that I did.
But only after it is announced of course.
PM plz.I revealed it last Monday to one of your own posters who asked me via PM I'll let him verify that I did.
But only after it is announced of course.
Yeh I have seen him play and I've seen Caddy play and to me one didn't really stand out more than the other to be quite honest. Think your being a bit harsh on Stevens, in and out of the side, no continuity all he needs imo is a stable regular spot to prove himself. We are inevitably going to lose Gumby and or Pears anyway so I can't see the harm even if upgrade of picks were involved to sweeten it for us.One Stevens isn't that good i'd prefer NLM getting a game, secondly he is only worth a 3rd rounder not pears plus a 2nd or gumby and pears i'd maybe do a straight swap for reimers but thats it and lastly have you ever seen him play? He isn't that good.
Would Koby Stevens be an easier option than Caddy? Around the same age (koby a bit older) both hard bodied mids and have similar attributes. Question is what could we offer WC to make this happen? Gumby, Pears, Reimers or package 2 of the 3? maybe even our second rounder and one of those 3 players?
Thoughts?
Imagine these acquisitions
B Goddard
B Moloney
K Stevens
J Daniher
Yeh I have seen him play and I've seen Caddy play and to me one didn't really stand out more than the other to be quite honest. Think your being a bit harsh on Stevens, in and out of the side, no continuity all he needs imo is a stable regular spot to prove himself. We are inevitably going to lose Gumby and or Pears anyway so I can't see the harm even if upgrade of picks were involved to sweeten it for us.
Well not 100% sure but on ch7 news tonight they mentioned that Pears, Gumby and Hille believe it or not would more than likely find new homes next year. I know it's only ch 7 but who knows Pears and Gumby's names have been thrown around a bit.
You never said that in the original post, also why is everyone so sure pears and gumby are going to leave
But you must admit Yaco when u fall out with a coach your in a lot of trouble eg Watson and Hille with Sheedy in fact a lot of players and Sheedy!!!!