Trading Prismall..

[darren forssman]

You're basing your arguments on falsehoods here tablet tennis:

Cameron Wood? Travis Johnstone? Medhurst/Polak/Tarrant?

and brent moloney....

 

[TheTimeCometh]

All we are saying is, yes we know him and yes we might be bias, but give him a go, at another club if thats what it will take, and in a few years time when he is a star, feed us your crap then about speculation and guessing.

a star?? my crap?

hmmm. thank you for taking the guess work outta the future. i can finally get off the crystal ball and back into the crystal meth.

ta.

 

[TrentM]

Prismall and hawkins FOR Fevola and Pick 24ish

 

[sarah.13]

We don't need nor want him, he's a ratbag!!

 

[AM]

Please someone lock this thread. It's becoming more ludicrous by the day.

 

[vinum coupe]

Prismall and hawkins FOR Fevola and Pick 24ish

We should take that really. Whack Fev in the reserves and forget about him
At least I wouldn't have to keep hearing about him

 

[forrrestGump]

Please someone lock this thread. It's becoming more ludicrous by the day.

lock thread

no need for all this shite

 

[TheTimeCometh]

hmmm, ferous asking for a lock on a thread.

one that is yielding and conveying brilliance.

 

[Sinner]

What about keeping Prismall and losing Kelly for an early pick?

 

[Team Extreme]

What about keeping Prismall and losing Kelly for an early pick?

Maybe a couple of years ago but now Kelly is actually pulling his weight and winning the ball.

Cant we just get rid of Byrnes!

 

[DanA]

Maybe a couple of years ago but now Kelly is actually pulling his weight and winning the ball.

Cant we just get rid of Byrnes!

If we just get rid of Byrnes, Tenace and David Johnson. Move Scarlett to the veterans list and take our 3 draft picks plus Ranga I will be a happy man.

 

[alberto_cat]

If we just get rid of Byrnes, Tenace and David Johnson. Move Scarlett to the veterans list and take our 3 draft picks plus Ranga I will be a happy man.

doesn't sound too bad. wouldn't mind keeping DJ on the list, pretty handy VFL player.

 

[Sinner]

Byrnes, Blackjack and D Johnson would get games at other clubs, it's in everyones best interest. could get an Early pick for the 3 of those guys (Hi Fremantle) and Ranga isn't going to be around next year? The best scenario is to keep prismall (IMO)

 

[DanA]

Byrnes, Blackjack and D Johnson would get games at other clubs, it's in everyones best interest. could get an Early pick for the 3 of those guys (Hi Fremantle) and Ranga isn't going to be around next year? The best scenario is to keep prismall (IMO)

I agree, best case scenario for everyone is that Byrnes/Tenace/D.J get traded to clubs of their choice similar to King and Gardiner. If we could get an upgrades our 2nd and 3rd picks. Then fantastic.

 

[catzfan]

If 'blackjack' is a reference to Gamble then your wrong. He must be kept on the list. Fantastic Potential.

 

[sarah.13]

If 'blackjack' is a reference to Gamble then your wrong. He must be kept on the list. Fantastic Potential.

Blackjack = Tenace .

 

[cats 07]

To all of you Melbourne people out there that think that Prismal should go to your dismal club then just take a look at this week.
He is in the side because 2 of our best players are out which shows he is most likely our number 24 behind Kelly.
He is a great player and I would like to see continue his carrer at Geelong.
If we should trade anyone it should be Byrnes.

 

[cats2rise]

All well and good cats07, but have you ever thought that Prismall may indeed rather want to be playing AFL week in, week out, and not have to wait on injuries????

 

[rocker_oz33]

l don't think the club should trad pris unless he really wants to go,hes been a great VFL PLAYER and will and has been putting pressure on others to earn there spot(s) its just a matter of time for pris to get more games and as l see it why would he want to go to some other club and be thowin into the middle and be asked to star at least at the cats he has great support

 

[Gogeelong]

When you look at his stats you must also look at his game time.
Because of the team being so strong you will find that iff he gets in the low 20's for possies with 70% game time that is equal to the high 20's per match.
Combine this with his great disposal rate and that is a GREAT return.
Have no doubt he is a VERY good player and will not be given up lightly.
Every player is tradable.
If he were to leave I would want at the very least a late fist round pick.
This would be a speculative move as you are giving away all of the above for an unproven and unknown return

 

[DanA]

When you look at his stats you must also look at his game time.
Because of the team being so strong you will find that iff he gets in the low 20's for possies with 70% game time that is equal to the high 20's per match.
Combine this with his great disposal rate and that is a GREAT return.
Have no doubt he is a VERY good player and will not be given up lightly.
Every player is tradable.
If he were to leave I would want at the very least a late fist round pick.
This would be a speculative move as you are giving away all of the above for an unproven and unknown return

By that logic Dane Swan would average 40 possessions a game.