Of course it was. The same applies to WA clubs here.Any disadvantage Victorian clubs experienced last season was solely due to their Covid situation. It was unavoidable
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Of course it was. The same applies to WA clubs here.Any disadvantage Victorian clubs experienced last season was solely due to their Covid situation. It was unavoidable
How many need to be disadvantaged before the need to spread it around then? What’s the magic number?
What additional risks?
The AFL was effectively a totally separate population to the rest of QLD, operating under more strict rules than QLD (or WA) state requirements. They also played a number of games in SA (and WA) which meant that weirdly Adelaide had more home games than Brisbane.
That’d be right. You can sit in lockdown by yourselves just don’t train in groups of ten if we can’t!More than 2 for sure...and it's really just one club who are in Perth!
If one club is disadvantaged you think 17 other should share that disadvantage. You have no clue.
One case can easily turn into 100 cases . Yep just ONE case.It's 5 days my goodness, maybe if it's 2 weeks, mind you your Premier might do that, he's shown over and over again how scared nuts he is. It's ONE case.
More than 2 for sure...and it's really just one club who are in Perth!
I don't think the AFL control the SANFL or WAFL from memory, whereas they did control the VFL and NEAFL
Not many Melbourne clubs wanted to hub at all until Covid forced them outYou will find not many Melbourne clubs wanted to hub in Western Australia so it work out for both parties in the end
That’d be right. You can sit in lockdown by yourselves just don’t train in groups of ten if we can’t!
I am sure they were more then happy to hub Qld , nsw , SA it’s just like Melbourne clubs wanted no part of Western Australia hub unless if they really had toNot many Melbourne clubs wanted to hub at all until Covid forced them out
Yes, once Covid shut down Victoria I’m sure you are rightI am sure they were more then happy to hub Qld , nsw , SA it’s just like Melbourne clubs wanted no part of Western Australia hub unless if they really had to
Might want to recheck that first sentence.You can also not lockdown states over 1 case. Don’t expect other clubs to cop it because your leader wants to lock down the state every case that arises
Is that you Trent?WA WA WAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Hahaha, here we go again, with a little twist.Not many Melbourne clubs wanted to hub at all until Covid forced them out
Surly you guy’s will be getting out of your lockdown sooner then Friday another day of 0 casesYes, once Covid shut down Victoria I’m sure you are right
No, they didn’t want to hub to kick off the year, so it was left up to everyone else after whinging over the afls initial proposal. Already shown you the report on that one so not digging it up againHahaha, here we go again, with a little twist.
Got the proof of that?
You really struggle with facts don't you.
Hint: Not 1 Melbourne club said they would not hub.
Some players said that there would be players who might say no to hubs, in the worst case scenario that was put to them, but not 1 club said they would not hub.
What's next?
Ok i was being kind by saying you don't understand facts, but you keep at it, so now i will call it like it is.No, they didn’t want to hub to kick off the year, so it was left up to everyone else after whinging over the afls initial proposal. Already shown you the report on that one so not digging it up again
while the rest of the clubs would be hubbing it up for an uncertain length of time, the afl and Victorian government were trying to bring down borders so that the Victorian clubs wouldn’t have to hub at all
‘Bit rich’: WA premier whacks ‘pampered’ Victorian clubs
Mark McGowan couldn’t resist taking a pot shot towards Victoria as he made a major AFL announcement.7news.com.au
While McGowan is not willing to grant border exemptions, he instead continues to push the case for some of Victoria’s 10 clubs to relocate to a quarantine hub in WA.
“The two-week quarantine arrangement needs to stay in place, the integrity of the state borders needs to stay,” McGowan said.
“It appears to me Victorian clubs aren’t willing to leave their comfort zone and come over here to hub in Western Australia, yet they expect our teams to go over there.
Players predominantly from Victorian clubs refused to hub under the AFL initial proposal. Fact.Ok i was being kind by saying you don't understand facts, but you keep at it, so now i will call it like it is.
You are a full on liar.
No club said they would not hub, some players (not all Vics) said there would be some who would not go in a worst case scenario.
“The two-week quarantine arrangement needs to stay in place, the integrity of the state borders needs to stay,” McGowan said.
See your 1st one is wrong again, they didn't refuse, go read the quotes, they said, "there would be some players who MIGHT not go into hubs"Players predominantly from Victorian clubs refused to hub under the AFL initial proposal. Fact.
They were more than happy when the next proposal involved everyone else going into a hub for an uncertain amount of time. Fact.
The afl and Victorian government tried pressuring other states to bring down their borders. Fact.
victorian clubs left Melbourne only when there was positively no other option. Fact.
Adam Simpson?Is that you Trent?
Jack?Adam Simpson?
Melbourne players chucked a tantrum when the afl presented their first hub proposal in a zoom conference. So it was scrapped for one which proposed everyone else to go into a hub, which they found much more appealing. Better?See your 1st one is wrong again, they didn't refuse, go read the quotes, they said, "there would be some players who MIGHT not go into hubs"
Now when the hubs started, guess what? some players didn't go.
As i said, you are unable to comprehend what a fact is.
Now, your initial statement was "Melbourne clubs refused to go into hubs"
Not 1 club refused, comprehend? probably not.
You can also not lockdown states over 1 case. Don’t expect other clubs to cop it because your leader wants to lock down the state every case that arises