Rubbish you work at BunningsHardly irrational...I'm in the game and this shit is real. This is happening.
20% down, Hang Seng
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Rubbish you work at BunningsHardly irrational...I'm in the game and this shit is real. This is happening.
20% down, Hang Seng
I take your comment as an admission that decreased tax for Australian business is a good thing and thus you now support the tax on mining super profits in order to assist the non mining sector with reduced tax, improved infrastructure and increased national savings and investment.
Geez - its not like he can't differentiate a risk free rate from WACC...........Once again you demonstrate you have no idea.
There is every reason to believe increased taxes on mining will decrease revenue compared to what it would otherwise have been.
There is every reason to believe this will not be offset by a 2% (Treasury argued for 5%) cut in corporate tax particularly when a new 3% payroll tax is added on top.
How much is raised from the new tax? How much is offset by the reduction (net after payroll tax)?
It is a net large tax rise on business across the economy.
That this is bad policy is indeed common sense.
Pity the Pavlovian cheerleaders can not comprehend this.
I imagine they might. But I also imagine they might return quite quickly. And that they'd also ditch countries like Australia because of other worries.Clay, a lot of the large instos are fairly indinscriminate. If they decide to lighten their exposure to Australia, for whatever reason on a particular day, or over a number of days, they sell the entire basket of stocks; not just BHP/ Rio. Its all index weighted.
I imagine they might. But I also imagine they might return quite quickly. And that they'd also ditch countries like Australia because of other worries.
Pinning the movements of the ASX or AUD on a specific tax is sheer lunacy when world events are so much larger.
As my homies say - keep it real.
I imagine they might. But I also imagine they might return quite quickly. And that they'd also ditch countries like Australia because of other worries.
Pinning the movements of the ASX or AUD on a specific tax is sheer lunacy when world events are so much larger.
As my homies say - keep it real.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...review-super-tax/story-e6frg9dx-1225868605991
Announcement just in time for Question Time.
What's Kev's next move? Nationalising the banks?
I imagine they might. But I also imagine they might return quite quickly. And that they'd also ditch countries like Australia because of other worries.
Pinning the movements of the ASX or AUD on a specific tax is sheer lunacy when world events are so much larger.
As my homies say - keep it real.[/quote]
If you keep your head up there for so long you'll eventually suffocate ! You have got no idea. The flood of money out of our market is mainly due to the mining tax announcement. How stupid/ignorant/full of yourself do you have to be not to realise that??? That's the real world.
Rubbish you work at Bunnings
Fair to say that pinning the movements of the ASX or AUD on a specific tax is akin to pinning the reason for avoiding the recession wholely and solely from government stimulus?
Tax is paying a huge part, ignore it as much as you want but when it finally comes out in the press you will have to eat humble pie.
Rudd and his gang have poured petrol onto the fire, we would have gone down but they have made sure it is worse than it should be and that we will not rebound quickly.
Until the matter of the tax is resolved they will stay away. Foreign investors do not like hearing Govts say their profits belong to the locals.
Just a quick question, FP - what is the number for WACC for resource cos?Geez - its not like he can't differentiate a risk free rate from WACC...........
Ah ha ha ha... Centrelink pay day today for you today...don't buy too many packs of smokes and cans of bourbon!!!
Yep. I agree with that.
But you can't criticise this government's economic record given we're one of the few major countries that didn't have a recession.
Don't operate in that sector - sorry.Just a quick question, FP - what is the number for WACC for resource cos?
Because on this slide (page 3) it seems the new tax system is only better for mining cos if the rate of return is less than ~10%.
That seems absurdly low to me.
Yes, but I admit it.
You just pretend to be in finance
Could there be a (possibly) unintended consequence from the tax that the stuff we are digging out of the ground will be dug out at a slower rate, enabling the resources industry to be sustainable for longer?
Of course, I'm assuming there isn't a huge amount of reserves either not found or not being mined yet, as I wouldn't have a clue how much is in the ground waiting to be found and/or dug.
Depends how long the resource is in demand as well; who knows what could happen in 5-10 years time - perhaps we wont need as much coal?
I'd say the Mining Industry is also pretty filthy about there being absolutely no consultation with them before this was announced.
Depends how long the resource is in demand as well; who knows what could happen in 5-10 years time - perhaps we wont need as much coal?
China will build 500 coal-fired power plants in the next decade, at the rate of almost one a week. This massive appetite for coal means equally huge greenhouse gas emissions.
All Twiggy is doing is raising the white flag...instead of that, he and his greed driven mates should be saying to the government - stuff your tax, we'll continue to do our business. Better to fight than to run away and be a coward.
Huh??
So if a potential project is now either unfundable or likely marginal because of the new tax regime, they should just roll the dice with a few billion dollars to prove their courage?