Not inspired, just recognising that we have a tax expert on this board unlike most of us.
Recognized that weeks ago.
Still says a heap without saying a lot though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Not inspired, just recognising that we have a tax expert on this board unlike most of us.
You know Dr Jolly, I once wondered if my extremely poor view of your village idiot style posts was unfair and maybe it was a personal thing between us, but it seems your idiocy and cluelessness are universal after all.
You'll love Gillard's massive backdown tomorrow - happy about that?
No, I said it because, on the basis of fairfax leaks, it's true ... and you know it..
Sounds like sanity has prevailed.
As opposed to the insanity that was the original proposal that you thought was a good idea. That the Government had previously refused to negotiate on.
It sounds like a more workable solution may have been reached. If only the government had the foresight to discuss the tax like they have now before including it in the budget.
Other threads have exposed the myth that there was no consulation before the announcement. No need to continue propogating it here.
It all sounds like a better solution.
Hypocrite.
I can't believe how blatant and transparent you guys are; back something to the absolute hilt when your Government was pushing it, and as soon as they concede it was a cluster****, you praise them for changing it?
Proof that you don't actually evaluate or consider any proposal yourself, and just follow the (in this case, moronic) line spouted by your Political idols.
And you feel justified in calling other people fanboys?
Bullshit they have.
Hypocrite.
I can't believe how blatant and transparent you guys are; back something to the absolute hilt when your Government was pushing it, and as soon as they concede it was a cluster****, you praise them for changing it?
Proof that you don't actually evaluate or consider any proposal yourself, and just follow the (in this case, moronic) line spouted by your Political idols.
And you feel justified in calling other people fanboys?
Doctor I knew I have seen you before....................
I agree with the sentiment generally, I really do, but this is political grandstanding and doesn't reflect on the quality of the original policy. It's a new PM washing her hands of the other bloke and looking like a hard arse that gets shit done. The mining dispute has been fish in a barrell stuff for Gillard.
Expect to see more of it. It's not overly impressive politics from my POV, rather compltely obvious and easy to get done, but it will have a tremendous effect on how she is received.
I know this is a hard concept keep. And tax is a complicated topic which mostly goes over your head, but let me put it this way.
The "labour fanboi's" wanted an increase in miners tax. They got it. Wasnt quite original model, but thats negotiations.
The "liberal fanboi's" wanted no increase in miners tax. They got sold out by BHP, Rio, etc.
You lose.
Agree completely mate; I called it the day Gillard took Office.
They need to distance her from Rudd; this issue is the most obvious one - she looks like a genius because she doesn't implement a tax that was so stupid that nobody in their right mind would implement. She's being praised for not doing something stupid and unworkable,.
Which makes the crap from people like Doctor Jolly even more amusing. They almost completely backed the RSPT from day one, regardless of what information was put in front of them.
It has now been revised, which anybody reasonable realises was done for politically expedient reasons, and they're carrying on like she's a Hero.
Goes over my head does it? My knowledge is nowhere near as detailed as Eagle87's, but I think these threads have shown I've got you covered. Although that doesn't really contradict your point that it mostly goes over my head.
The Labor fanboys (ie, YOU), wanted the tax kept, in it's original format, without any alterations what so ever.
Most Liberal fanboys were comfortable with the royalty scheme being reviewed, under consultation with the mining industry, and a new, realistic tax structure being implemented.
I'm not surprised you're trying to turn it around now, but really, anybody who has read the threads on this knows that you're hypocrite who blindly follows the ill-informed rants of the Labor Government.
Whatever floats your boat Elvis, but you seem to be at odds with your liberal leader who is still against any new tax on mining.
Maybe you're really a Gillard fanboi after all. You seem pretty impressed so far.
"The art of negotiation is to compromise but to still win the argument"- John Corsetti
We can sum it up simply in this way.
New mining tax = 12 billion in revenue. Call it a backdown all you want, but we all know that this $12 billion 'compromise' is more than the Liberals had in mind. I'll take a $12 billion windfall V nothing, any day of the week.
Normal people will take that every time, but Liberal ideologues...well they can keep crying into their chardonnays.
The new mining tax apparently raises 10.5 billion but only because they made an $8 billion error in the original numbers which they only discovered this week.
**** me. Now that is priceless.
Just incidentally, does this windfall take into account the royalties rebate?