BlakeyNoFlakey
Brownlow Medallist
All reports are saying he is training well and has no after effects of the spiking. He will play.I think if he ended up in hospital there is a good chance he misses this week’s game purely out of caution.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 2 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
All reports are saying he is training well and has no after effects of the spiking. He will play.I think if he ended up in hospital there is a good chance he misses this week’s game purely out of caution.
So this has been confirmed?All reports are saying he is training well and has no after effects of the spiking. He will play.
Think it's been said he'll line up for next week.I think if he ended up in hospital there is a good chance he misses this week’s game purely out of caution.
But it won’t be because he was dropped or punished. It will be to make sure he is ok medically.
From all reports he’s expected to play this weekend.I think if he ended up in hospital there is a good chance he misses this week’s game purely out of caution.
But it won’t be because he was dropped or punished. It will be to make sure he is ok medically.
Yeah but it's a slippery slope. I think you have to regardless.I don’t think they drop him at all.
They know he is the type of person who needs support, dropping him for going out on the piss isn’t that IMO
Like Patrick said, he had an error in judgement.
If he repeats I’m in agreement with you
Exactly right.We also don't know if there are any other issues in play, or what they'd be.
It's in Tyson's interests, and that of the club, for them to support him and nurture him.
It isn't the first time a player might've erred, and it won't be the last.
Whatever the circumstances were, I'll back the club to respond appropriately.
Thank you for being a voice of calm and patience on this threadLet's not jump to conclusions
Alcohol related doesn't necessarily mean he drank himself to stupidity - as more information is being released, there's suggestions his drink may have been spiked
That's still alcohol related but out of the individual's hands
is "the error of judgement" Danger referred to the spiking?All reports are saying he is training well and has no after effects of the spiking. He will play.
True that, unless Danger erred in speaking without knowingError in judgement line from Pat probably rules out drink spiking.
With a matter as sensitive as this one and with a captain as media-aware as Danger, I think the likelihood of him speaking without knowing is close to zero. That being the case, I don't think a drink spiking is being alluded to here at all. The error of judgement was both Tyson's for being there at that time and also Tyson's for drinking to excess.True that, unless Danger erred in speaking without knowing
It is what the Herald Sun were reporting it as....Where is this spiking nonsense coming from?
People in Geelong have verified he was in the bathroom doing lines.
I don't believe so. I think he was referring to Tyson's choice to go out nightclubbing by himself after they got back from Hobart as an error of judgment. That put Tyson in a position where his drink could be spiked. But it was not Tyson's fault that some f-wit did that to him. Tyson was actually a victim of a crime if his drink was spiked. Don't forget that.is "the error of judgement" Danger referred to the spiking?
Drink spiking comes more alive during the Olympics.What exactly is the source of this spiking suggestion?
We're working on very little verified info here, and as far as I can tell spiking isn't part of that.
I'm not saying it didn't happen, but until we can identify a source, much less verify that it actually happened, it's just basic speculation.
But the tone of some posts seem to have absorbed this into the narrative as fact.
Like everything the AFL do, definitions are loosey goosey to apply whenever they see fitdefine disrepute tho?? The term seems to be very loosely and unfairly applied. It should exist for very immoral actions or behaviors that are essentially unlawful. I don’t agree in its application to players just having a night out and getting overly intoxicated.
I agree those clauses have a purpose, but they are being abused at times with over reactivity.
I think there are great examples of this clause working such as the strike policy on illegal drug usage (which is a crime) and also the tarryn Thomas example of violent sexual harassment towards women.
Stengle getting heavily intoxicated at a club?? Leave the kid alone. Between him and his family and doctors.
If the club seriously suspected his drink was spiked, they would surely say so. As Danger has already made a statement on behalf of the club that makes no reference whatsoever to any such subterfuge, I believe it's clear that explanation of events is not in play.All this conjecture is not edifying for anyone- this is a case where it should be put to bed with a definitive statement from the club, either way, imho, but there's also a chance the club does not have the info.
Sure, ideally the club should release a more definitive statement. But, as you say, they may not have that info, or perhaps they might feel (along with Tyson himself), that it's no-one elses business.Drink spiking comes more alive during the Olympics.
All this conjecture is not edifying for anyone- this is a case where it should be put to bed with a definitive statement from the club, either way, imho, but there's also a chance the club does not have the info.
He really does have a face oppo fans would want to punch unfortunately
With a matter as sensitive as this one and with a captain as media-aware as Danger, I think the likelihood of him speaking without knowing is close to zero. That being the case, I don't think a drink spiking is being alluded to here at all. The error of judgement was both Tyson's for being there at that time and also Tyson's for drinking to excess.
I trust the club to get it right from here in how they handle the matter. But it is a really bad look for Tys on the back of recently signing a long-term deal at the Cattery. Hopefully this is the reset he needs to get back to better habits for the journey ahead.
#stayclassygeelong
What odds would you give it if you were actually a bookie, and what maths would have gone into it?I would say it's an error of judgement either way. But yeah drink spiking was always long odds
That's a real good question. I guess shooting from the hip like $5 odds? Zero mathsWhat odds would you give it if you were actually a bookie, and what maths would have gone into it?