Umpires payrise.

Remove this Banner Ad

Dec 7, 2001
23,439
8,512
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
UMPIRES have won the same pay rises as players under a deal to be announced this week.
The AFL has agreed to officials' demands to match the rate of player salary increases over five years.

A submission was prepared last July by the AFL Umpires' Association to link upgrades with the $780 million generated from television rights.

Umpires will receive a 23 per cent jump over the next five years until 2011.

While an average umpire's salary is $55,000-$65,000, it will boost a top umpire's earning capacity to almost $110,000 this season and $125,000 in the final year of the agreement.

Player wages, which average $220,000, have increased about 6 per cent in the past two years.

Association chief executive Bill Deller said it was a satisfying result.

"We're happy with it," Deller said.

"We have reached agreement in principle, so as we understand it now there are just one or two points to clear up, but by and large it's all agreed and it's being written up.

"It's basically pretty much the same as the players -- 7 per cent for the first couple of years and three after that.

"It's taken a long time, with some other things bobbing up, but everything we put in were warranted increases and the league has been supportive."

Deller said the earning capacity of the oft-maligned whistle-blowers had become greater than ever before.

There are 108 field, boundary and goal umpires.

"Potentially it's that ($100,000), but it depends on the number of matches and finals they do," Deller said.

"There are bonuses along the way for achieving certain results. It is possible for the top umpires to earn that amount, but on the other hand, the newer umpires and those inexperienced ones are on a hell of a lot less than that."

Deller said they would certainly be better off under the new deal and that it had been handled very well by both sides and in an amicable way.

"When you talk about percentage increases you're actually talking about where your starting point is, so umpires don't get paid what players do, so you start from a lower base," he said.

"But then again our people work. Most of them don't rely on football for their income. The majority or all are employed otherwise."

Umpires are ranked according to performance, with Brett Allen named All-Australian last year.

Since 2000 the best have been able to earn $100,000-$110,000.

Former umpire Derek Humphery-Smith said umpires should be pleased with the outcome of negotiations.

"It is a good thing assuming there is pay equity," Humphery-Smith said.

"Any mirroring of pay increases is a good thing."

BANISHED Grand Final umpire Darren Goldspink underwent a time trial on Friday morning around Princes Park.

He had to complete the 4kms in less than 15 minutes to return to the roster.

During pre-season he struggled to get the time down and was dropped because of lack of fitness.
Goldspink, 42, has officiated in 359 games.
http://www.news.com.au/sundayheraldsun/story/0,21985,21521014-11088,00.html


Wow.hey they are kidding right.
 
UMPIRES have won the same pay rises as players under a deal to be announced this week.
The AFL has agreed to officials' demands to match the rate of player salary increases over five years.

A submission was prepared last July by the AFL Umpires' Association to link upgrades with the $780 million generated from television rights.

Umpires will receive a 23 per cent jump over the next five years until 2011.

While an average umpire's salary is $55,000-$65,000, it will boost a top umpire's earning capacity to almost $110,000 this season and $125,000 in the final year of the agreement.

Player wages, which average $220,000, have increased about 6 per cent in the past two years.

Association chief executive Bill Deller said it was a satisfying result.

"We're happy with it," Deller said.

"We have reached agreement in principle, so as we understand it now there are just one or two points to clear up, but by and large it's all agreed and it's being written up.

"It's basically pretty much the same as the players -- 7 per cent for the first couple of years and three after that.

"It's taken a long time, with some other things bobbing up, but everything we put in were warranted increases and the league has been supportive."

Deller said the earning capacity of the oft-maligned whistle-blowers had become greater than ever before.

There are 108 field, boundary and goal umpires.

"Potentially it's that ($100,000), but it depends on the number of matches and finals they do," Deller said.

"There are bonuses along the way for achieving certain results. It is possible for the top umpires to earn that amount, but on the other hand, the newer umpires and those inexperienced ones are on a hell of a lot less than that."

Deller said they would certainly be better off under the new deal and that it had been handled very well by both sides and in an amicable way.

"When you talk about percentage increases you're actually talking about where your starting point is, so umpires don't get paid what players do, so you start from a lower base," he said.

"But then again our people work. Most of them don't rely on football for their income. The majority or all are employed otherwise."

Umpires are ranked according to performance, with Brett Allen named All-Australian last year.

Since 2000 the best have been able to earn $100,000-$110,000.

Former umpire Derek Humphery-Smith said umpires should be pleased with the outcome of negotiations.

"It is a good thing assuming there is pay equity," Humphery-Smith said.

"Any mirroring of pay increases is a good thing."

BANISHED Grand Final umpire Darren Goldspink underwent a time trial on Friday morning around Princes Park.

He had to complete the 4kms in less than 15 minutes to return to the roster.

During pre-season he struggled to get the time down and was dropped because of lack of fitness.
Goldspink, 42, has officiated in 359 games.
http://www.news.com.au/sundayheraldsun/story/0,21985,21521014-11088,00.html


Wow.hey they are kidding right.

That is why they can't get the decisions right on the field - too busy counting their money at night.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

They deserve the money. I would even be happy for them to be paid more and become full-time professionals. Spend all week analysing videos and being coached on the performances in all 8 games from the weekend.

With all it's grey areas and interpretive rules aussie rules has be the toughest sport in the world to umpire. And despite what people on here say it wouldn't be easy umpiring AFL matches, particularly with the pace of the modern game. If it was, we'd all be doing it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

We should pay them as professionals. How many posters here could meet the fitness requirments alone? Personally I'd be 30-60 seconds outside the time trial requirements at least.

Given the need to use fakes names for bookings, threats against friends and family & the constant harrassment by dim-witted media dinosaurs for whom bagging umpires is habit rather than factual (yes you Sam Newman) I think they have been underpaid in previous seasons.
 
Bring back 'whats your decision' and make the umps earn their bucks by having to justify their decisions!!!!!

Umpires are protected and unaccountable. Wish i had a job like that!:eek:
 
Put them on performance-based contracts. On their performance over the past fortnight, they deserve a pay cut.
 
Except, they don not have specific pieces in the daily rags on them, pulling their performance each week apart. Do they?

Why are they not acountable, transparent.

There are umpire observers at every game that put in a detailed report. Every decision is scrutinised, as is their positioning etc.

Don't talk nonsense about them being unaccountable. What's in the papers hardly comes under useful criticism.
 
Put them on performance-based contracts. On their performance over the past fortnight, they deserve a pay cut.

I am not a massive fan of umpires, but i think that is Jeff Geishans fault. The guy is an idiot who attempts to justify his job by changing the rule interpretations on a weekly basis. What is with the round 1 holding the ball interpretations? We are going to see players stand off and wait for others to take possession so that they can tackle them very soon:rolleyes:
 
They should all be on performance based. The AFL would save a heap every year.

Might put posters on performance-based membership. Three crap posts and you're out.

We'd have the place cleaned up in a week.
 
I am not a massive fan of umpires, but i think that is Jeff Geishans fault. The guy is an idiot who attempts to justify his job by changing the rule interpretations on a weekly basis. What is with the round 1 holding the ball interpretations? We are going to see players stand off and wait for others to take possession so that they can tackle them very soon:rolleyes:

Beckers,

Sorry to burst that bubble your living in, but its not Gieshen who changes the rule interpretations - its the rules committee in conjunction with the $1M dollar man and his ankles man, anderson. The umpires are just the saps who cop the blame!

Sure the umpires dont get it right all the time, but then again who would/can. Besides - i would miss having the ability to swear at the TV on a weekend if they were perfect. ;)
 
Beckers,

Sorry to burst that bubble your living in, but its not Gieshen who changes the rule interpretations - its the rules committee in conjunction with the $1M dollar man and his ankles man, anderson. The umpires are just the saps who cop the blame!

Sure the umpires dont get it right all the time, but then again who would/can. Besides - i would miss having the ability to swear at the TV on a weekend if they were perfect. ;)

Yeh, but there was no rule or interpretation change from round 1 to round 2 but someone 'asked' them to enforce the rule differently.

I prefer the umps to miss a few frees than pay ones that are NOT really there! Either way we get to swear at the TV on teh weekend:D
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Umpires payrise.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top