- Thread starter
- #51
How ironic.
How ironic.
How ironic.
Rinse and repeat. So weird. Enjoy the rest of your weekend Roylion.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How ironic.
How ironic.
How ironic.
Rinse and repeat. So weird.
Let it go. You seem to be obsessed with what and how I post. The ignore button is your friend.
I really don't care how often, or on what, you post.
As I said, I don't care I was just curious. Yes, I'm repeating that, and I'm accusing you of repeating the same thing over and over, but it's still true. It's simply curiosity of the human psyche.
Give me an example of when you were wrong about something on here and admitted it and didn't just double-down/triple-down on the same thing over and over. Is there anything that springs to mind? Just curious.
Let it go with this obsession with what and how I post. The ignore button is your friend.
The search function is also your friend.
Changing the subject now? If you think I'm wrong in this instance (on this particular thread topic, which is what we're supposed to be actually discussing), tell me exactly why. Convince me with your well argued reasons, backed up with plenty of supporting evidence. You're apparently well aware of my argument. After all, I've got 19,000 posts on the subject.
(Please note the last sentence as an attempt at humour. I'm trying to get my humour quotient up. Apparently that's important in posting.)
Dan that's pretty rude. He's pointed out a helpful improvement, on a subject that a lot of less informed posters get wrong.Now you're just repeating the same thing over and over again. Rinse and repeat. Not about your pet topic this time, but the recent exchange between you and I. You've already made all these points; you don't need to keep repeating them. I heard you the first time. Insane. Absolutely insane. You just can't let anything go. Same humorless tone, same cut-and-paste (not literally) style. It's like banging your head against a brick wall. Astonishing.
My motto is if you think you are the smartest person in the room, then you are in the wrong room.
Where did I say or imply that?
You're just trying to change the subject now. Somehow it's gone from your complaint that I post exclusively on one topic to now that I somehow I 'think I'm never wrong because I'm the smartest person in the room'. The old 'red herring' fallacy.
Why don't you address my comments on the topic about Brisbane's position in your list?
That question is OT.I can do that later (maybe if I feel like it), but as I said I'm sick of your discussing of the topic and I don't want to bore myself with it at the moment. It essentially comes down to the difference between legal and practical, but I don't want to get you started, as everything you have said is out there in thousands of posts anyway. I don't want to read your same posts re-hashed. It will just waste everyone's time, and I'd be guilty of getting you started. I'm more curious if you can give me an example of you being wrong. You never answered, you just deflected.
I can do that later (maybe if I feel like it), but as I said I'm sick of your discussing of the topic
It essentially comes down to the difference between legal and practical, but I don't want to get you started, as everything you have said is out there in thousands of posts anyway.
I don't want to read your same posts re-hashed.
I'm more curious if you can give me an example of you being wrong.
You never answered, you just deflected.
Talk about something else.
in many ways you're really just a spammer.
I'll discuss it if I feel like it, but if it is going to end with your cut-and-paste style repetition, then no I will not engage.
No I just don’t want to engage with your obsession, because you can’t take the hint and let it go and because it’s just repetition of thousands of posts you’ve already made.I'm trying to talk about the position you placed Brisbane at, in the list you presented. Seeing this is after all what the thread is about.
You've taken it elsewhere.
No I just don’t want to engage with your obsession, because you can’t take the hint and let it go and because it’s just repetition of thousands of posts you’ve already made.
Ironic.Give me an example of when you were wrong about something on here and admitted it and didn't just double-down/triple-down on the same thing over and over. Is there anything that springs to mind? Just curious.
Let it go. Use that ignore button.You are just a spammer RL
You are just a spammer RL
I'd like to see that!I can see a solution to this entertaining little spat, just lock this thread and reopen it after the Lions 2024-25-26 3Peat and the OP will be proven correct.
I can see a solution to this entertaining little spat, just lock this thread and reopen it after the Lions 2024-25-26 3Peat and the OP will be proven correct.
Let it go, really?
From the man who posts literally thousands of posts on one topic for 2 decades.
Give it a break.
As I said, you're a weird, curious individual.
But Jesus, you are obsessive.
Go for it.
So that settles it and confirms what everyone already knows.Performance metric of each club measured against time in the competition. Source AFL tables.
Metrics
Flags
GS's
Finals won
Finals played.
Metric divided by years in the comp, for example Adelaide have 2 flags divided by 33 years gives them an average of 0.0606 premierships per year.
Just my opinion but these metrics separate those on equal number of flags with equal time in the competition.
Flags GF Finals Won Finals played Years in comp Total averages Ade 2 3 18 36 33 Averages 0.0606 0.0909 0.5454 1.0909 1.7878 Bris 4 5 20 32 37 Averages 0.108 0.1351 0.54054 0.8648 1.6484 Collingwood 16 43 84 190 127 Averages 0.1259 0.3385 0.6614 1.496 2.6218 Carlton 16 29 67 143 127 Averages 0.1259 0.2283 0.5275 1.1259 2.0076 Essendon 16 28 69 132 127 Averages 0.1259 0.2204 0.5433 1.0393 1.9289 Fremantle 0 1 7 17 29 Averages 0 0.0344 0.2413 0.5862 0.8619 Geelong 10 19 60 134 127 Averages 0.0787 0.1496 0.4274 1.0551 1.7108 GC 0 0 0 0 13 Averages 0 0 0 0 0 GWS 0 1 9 18 12 Averages 0 0.0833 0.75 1.5 2.3333 Hawthorn 13 19 54 87 99 Averages 0.1313 0.1919 0.5454 0.8787 1.7473 Melbourne 13 18 54 94 127 Averages 0.1023 0.1417 0.4251 0.7401 1.4092 North Melbourne 4 9 35 75 99 Averages 0.0404 0.0909 0.3535 0.7575 1.2423 Port Adelaide 1 2 14 30 27 Averages 0.037 0.074 0.05185 1.1111 1.2739 Ricmond 13 24 56 94 116 Averages 0.112 0.2068 0.4827 0.8534 1.6549 St Kilda 1 7 22 55 127 Averages 0.0078 0.0551 0.1732 0.433 0.6691 Syd / Sth Melb 5 19 44 97 127 Averages 0.0393 0.1496 0.3464 0.7637 1.299 West Coast 4 7 26 55 37 Averages 0.1081 0.1891 0.7027 1.4864 2.4863 WB / Footscray 2 4 21 57 99 Averages 0.0202 0.0404 0.2121 0.5757 0.8484 Fitzroy 8 13 34 59 127 0.0629 0.1023 0.2677 0.4645 0.8974
Well the blues and gws are right up there, despite gws not winning a flag.So that settles it and confirms what everyone already knows.
1. Collingwood
2. West Coast
The Rest.