NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 2

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bostonian said:
Look how long it took for Epstein and the likes of Weinstein to be exposed.

Seems one side is far better at cover ups.

Then again the party of the Kennedy's and Clintons has a long history of that.
Click to expand...
Yes yes mate, we know - democrats are the party of child sex offenders and Republicans have been better than them on voting rights, we got it :tearsofjoy:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

zill said:
Relax, it was a joke. Mal was talking about age of consent laws that got changed 150 years ago, it just happened to be where Biden represented. He has been in office close to, but not quite, 150 years.
Click to expand...
"Just joking"

2nd time this week you've mentioned that Biden is a pedo. A quick search reveals you've been pretty active in the Pizzagate thread too.

Like I said, creeping in.
 
zill said:
Do you really think pollies are interested in prosecuting other pollies?
Click to expand...

You're literally the one that's been telling us all that the Democrats are behind all of Trumps legal troubles, and it's all just an example of 'lawfare' by the Democratic party.

What do you think the Jan 6th Committee hearings were all about if they didn't give a shit about prosecuting anyone?

Literally the only reason Trump hasn't faced a ton of charges to date (including with his links to Russia) are because there is a mixed legal view on whether he can be charged (as the President may be immune to criminal prosecution).

He's immune from civil suit on account of actions taken as President. Maybe also criminal (but that's not clear yet).
 
Malifice said:
You're literally the one that's been telling us all that the Democrats are behind all of Trumps legal troubles, and it's all just an example of 'lawfare' by the Democratic party.

What do you think the Jan 6th Committee hearings were all about if they didn't give a shit about prosecuting anyone?

Literally the only reason Trump hasn't faced a ton of charges to date (including with his links to Russia) are because there is a mixed legal view on whether he can be charged (as the President may be immune to criminal prosecution).

He's immune from civil suit on account of actions taken as President. Maybe also criminal (but that's not clear yet).
Click to expand...
Funny that, pollies giving themselves immunity from prosecution. None of them want to rock that boat, they are all in it together.

And don't confuse me with other posters, when have i said anything about trumps legal problems.
 
bourbons said:
bekphnqftcb41.jpg


I go a bit hard on poor old EasternTiger, but at least he actually has the courage to own his Trump worship. Everyone else here of a conservative lean seems to defend Trump in just about every instance, yet pretend they don't actually like or support him.

Always very instructive when the convo is about the legals, holding Trump to account vs holding Joe/Hunter to account. Practically every left leaning poster on this thread is happy for both sides to be torn a new one legally speaking, whereas with the right wingers frothing at the mouth about the Bidens' avoidance of scrutiny, for dear leader its always witchunt this, politically motivated that, wah wah wah. This is despite the mountain of verified undisputed facts arrayed against Trump vs those against Biden, of course.
Click to expand...
Are you owning your pom pom waving for Biden?

Best of a bad bunch is Biden. = Sane, well considered, normal person.
Best of a bad bunch is Trump = MAGA, trumpist, coward, cooker.

I'm sorry that you identified with my post.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

zill said:
Don't be disingenuous, that act was absolutely horrendous and saw incarceration rates skyrocket, with increased prison time as well.
Click to expand...

Again, that Bill was passed by the Republicans (who controlled the Senate in the 99th congress when it was passed), and under Reagan as President (also a Republican).

Biden (and the Democratic majority House) supported it because it also contained billions of dollars of social welfare measures (drug counseling, substance abuse programs, education, prevention etc) designed to get people away from (and off) drugs:

The act authorized billions of dollars of spending, although substantially less was actually appropriated. Some of this was used to increase the substance abuse treatment federal block grant program,[12] although treatment providers were disappointed at the reduced appropriations following politicians' earlier promises and authorization.[7]

Other programs funded by the act included drug counseling and education programs,[9] AIDS research,[12] and international cooperation to limit drug production.[9]

The Act also included the Drug Free Schools and Communities Act, which required colleges to establish drug abuse education and prevention programs.[13]
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Drug_Abuse_Act_of_1986

It's like how the Dems had to sneak their Assault weapons ban (which the Republicans oppose) into a 'tough on crime' Bill (which the Republicans support). Unless you control both Houses AND have a President on your side who won't veto your bill, you need to compromise to get shit done in Washington.
 
Malifice said:
Again, that Bill was passed by the Republicans (who controlled the Senate in the 99th congress when it was passed), and under Reagan as President (also a Republican).

Biden (and the Democratic majority House) supported it because it also contained billions of dollars of social welfare measures (drug counseling, substance abuse programs, education, prevention etc) designed to get people away from (and off) drugs:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Drug_Abuse_Act_of_1986

It's like how the Dems had to sneak their Assault weapons ban (which the Republicans oppose) into a 'tough on crime' Bill (which the Republicans support). Unless you control both Houses AND have a President on your side who won't veto your bill, you need to compromise to get shit done in Washington.
Click to expand...
Still being disingenuous, or perhaps your cognitive dissonance kicking in. Biden had his hands all over these bills, and thought they didn't go far enough. I literally posted an article about it, from Vice so you can't say it's some right wing thing. Continuing to claim Biden wasn't in favour of these bills is straight up misinformation, coming from you I'm not surprised though. No lie too big if it will protect your precious demented racist.
 
It was the 94 Crime Bill that lead to the mass incarcerations.

"By 1994, all states had passed at least one mandatory minimum law, but the 1994 crime bill encouraged even more punitive laws and harsher practices on the ground, including by prosecutors and police, to lock up more people and for longer periods of time."
 
skipper kelly said:
Are you owning your pom pom waving for Biden?

Best of a bad bunch is Biden. = Sane, well considered, normal person.
Best of a bad bunch is Trump = MAGA, trumpist, coward, cooker.

I'm sorry that you identified with my post.
Click to expand...
Might want to check out a few of my posts in SRP regarding Biden. Shocking cadidate who should be nowhere near the nomination, and is currently unconditionally supporting a genocide.

Noting obvious cookery to the cookers spouting it != supporting Biden. In the latest example, I'm simply reminding posters like lebbo and zill, who respectively still believe that there was clear evidence of pedo stuff and corruption on Hunter's laptop, that its pretty clear their narrative is bullshit, due to the fact that 2 Trump appointees heading their respective DoJ orgs had access to the thing for 12 months and no charges against Hunter materialised, at a time when that kind of thing is exactly what Trump as POTUS was trying to manufacture. I notice you've also ignored the 2nd paragraph of my post regarding closet Trumpers' distaste for dear leader facing any legal accountability for literally anything, ever, in sharp contrast to how lefties react to the possibility of legals impacting the Bidens.

Yet another good example on this very page. Though not exactly 'cooker' stuff, listening to zill's charachterisation you'd be forgiven for thinking that Biden single-handedly wrote the entire '94 crime bill (which is pretty shit, I agree) and somehow forced it through. Mal has presented facts in response to this detailing what is actually in the entire bill, how it came about and how it was passed by a Republican senate. This is also not "supporting Biden".

In short, reality has a liberal bias (since about 2016 anyway, for fairly obvious reasons).
 
bourbons said:
Might want to check out a few of my posts in SRP regarding Biden. Shocking cadidate who should be nowhere near the nomination, and is currently unconditionally supporting a genocide.

Noting obvious cookery to the cookers spouting it != supporting Biden. In the latest example, I'm simply reminding posters like lebbo and zill, who respectively still believe that there was clear evidence of pedo stuff and corruption on Hunter's laptop, that its pretty clear their narrative is bullshit, due to the fact that 2 Trump appointees heading their respective DoJ orgs had access to the thing for 12 months and no charges against Hunter materialised, at a time when that kind of thing is exactly what Trump as POTUS was trying to manufacture. I notice you've also ignored the 2nd paragraph of my post regarding closet Trumpers' distaste for dear leader facing any legal accountability for literally anything, ever, in sharp contrast to how lefties react to the possibility of legals impacting the Bidens.

Yet another good example on this very page. Though not exactly 'cooker' stuff, listening to zill's charachterisation you'd be forgiven for thinking that Biden single-handedly wrote the entire '94 crime bill (which is pretty shit, I agree) and somehow forced it through. Mal has presented facts in response to this detailing what is actually in the entire bill, how it came about and how it was passed by a Republican senate. This is also not "supporting Biden".

In short, reality has a liberal bias (since about 2016 anyway, for fairly obvious reasons).
Click to expand...
Biden not being prosecuted doesn't mean there is no evidence of corruption on the laptop.

And Biden in the past has claimed credit for the crime bill. When he was running for president in 2008 he called it the 'Biden crime bill'. If you had read the vice article i had posted you would know that.
 
zill said:
Trump is the only exception.
Click to expand...
Now you're getting it :thumbsu:

He pretty clearly wanted to hang something, anything, on the Bidens in the leadup to the election. And with his 2 nominations running the FBI and DoJ, nothing from the "laptop from hell" ever materialised.

Coz those 2 nominations are corrupt of course, just like anyone not prepared to carry Donnie's water :tearsofjoy:
 
skipper kelly said:
You should give a rundown of your link when posting it.
Click to expand...
I did

bourbons said:
Only a few days left till America truly jumps the shark with the Biden Trump debate.

Donnie feeling pretty confident obviously

Geez, imagine if the dementia patient schools him. Can't happen surely, but good to see Don priming the adoring rubes for the unthinkable just in case!
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top