NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 2

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics - Pt 1

 

[bourbons]

You would have to be an idiot to think they are both as shitty as each other.



It's possibly that. Or it's possible that they work on Tuesdays. Or it's possible that there are other reasons for not voting.

Amazed its only 34% to be honest. 3 hours in line on a Tuesday would see me off (under normal circumstances - being an apparently much more sensible and moral person than Bostonian, I'd like to think I could muster up some minerals to make it less likely the orange roughy got back in. No promises tho lol)

 

[bourbons]

****s sake.

You: 'The Democrats want to kill babies'

Me: That's obviously untrue and hyperbole, and if that's why you don't like them your reasoning is based on a self-evident lie, which clearly should alert you to the fact you're wrong, or at least be a massive red flag your reasoning is ****ed''

You: 'You're a hypocrite'.

I see why you like Trump. You clearly dont let things like reasoning, insight or logic get in the way of your arguments.

You're talking to a bloke who argues with a straight face that Democrats have been worse than Republicans on voting rights

 

[Malifice]

Because they are corrupt as well i suppose.

So all of the forensic tests done on the laptop are fake, and the FBI and the Republicans themselves are in this plot to cover up Hunter Bidens laptop data?

You can read the article for yourself and make your own mind up about whether it was russian disinfo. Which is what hunters lawyer claimed as well.

It (the laptop containing paedo shit/ proof of wide ranging government corruption etc) is Russian disinfo.

And you believe it.

 

[bourbons]

Funnily enough Biden is a senator from Delaware. He was probably campaigning to lower the age of consent whilst also pushing through his crime bill. People who smoke crack need to be locked up for life according to him, obviously had to make an exception for his son.

"Probably"

A real shame what you have devolved into mate. You used to present as fairly rational, these days there appears to be plenty of Q adjacent pedo retribution type fantasies creeping in

 

[bourbons]

So all of the forensic tests done on the laptop are fake, and the FBI and the Republicans themselves are in this plot to cover up Hunter Bidens laptop data?

Yup.

Trump appointees to lead both the FBI and DoJ, plus the prosecution running the gun case against Hunter who literally just entered the laptop into evidence. All corrupt and just covering up for the Bidens

And these guys object to being called cookers lol

 

[Malifice]

Unfortunately it's true. Biden contributed to tens of thousands of black Americans being incarcerated for using the substance that his son repeatedly filmed himself using.

That's not Biden arguing for life sentences for crack smoking.

The laws with respect to crack cocaine possession (Federally) come from an Act passed by Reagan in 1986:

Ronald Reagan signed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, which increased federal funding for law enforcement and required harsher penalties in federal drug cases, including life imprisonment. This new “tough on crime” legislation mandated a minimum sentence of 5 years without parole for possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-w...d-how-federal-funding-shapes-criminal-justice

What the 1994 Act that Biden was involved with did was ban drug users and people subject to restraining orders from getting a Firearm (along with other assault weapon bans), something Hunter has now done.

The 1994 Act was a compromise with the Republicans. The Dems wanted to push through their Assault weapons bans, and make owning firearms tougher. They rolled gun control into a ton of 'tough on crime' bill to appease the Republicans and get the bill through the House.

 

[skipper kelly]

Seems to be a lot of posters pom pom for Biden but won't admit it. It's always but Trump.

 

[CM86]

Seems to be a lot of posters pom pom for Biden but won't admit it. It's always but Trump.

I can unironically say that I respect Biden, and have a personal dislike for Trump.
I'm also able to give reasons and explanations based on facts to support my opinions on both.


Why can't the Trump stans do the same?
Why do they always have to hide it behind "Kek, I just like watching lefties melt! Why are they always talking about Trump?!?".
While ignoring the literal cult following Trump has across the world.

View attachment 2025713

 

[skipper kelly]

Why does it matter?

Would have thought people might Google the quote itself to see if its real, unsure what the person posting it has to do with anything.

Bizarre.

Very wary of clicking links to nutjobs.

 

[CM86]

I like Lebbo and Purpleyes, because even though I strongly disagree with their views and positions, and how they arrive at them... At least they're honest with their position.
I can respect them for that to a degree. Even if we can find each others positions or views disgusting.

It's the cowards that hide behind the Lebbos and Purpleyes that I can't respect.


I'm so bored of MAGAt cowards.
I think to myself... Look at how much energy, time and effort they put into being boring.

 

[Satan]

Very wary of clicking links to nutjobs.

he played nelson mandela

 

[Bostonian]

You can, but by doing so you make it more likely the most corrupt biggest s**tstain of an option gets in.

You aren't half as sensible or moral as you think you are.

Or you start changing the duopoly system.

Be a ****ing coward though.

 

[skipper kelly]

he played nelson mandela

Cheers Satan. Never heard of him. It's all good. It upsets my RWNJ algo if I click on links I don't know. But posters tend to get upset asking who is who.

 

[Bostonian]

If the alternative is a more corrupt and greater shit stain it seems like a pretty rational choice?

There is no rational to your cowardly position.

 

[Malifice]

I like Lebbo and Purpleyes, because even though I strongly disagree with their views and positions, and how they arrive at them... At least they're honest with their position.

But they're not honest with themselves.

 

[Bostonian]

Only if he was running against Trump

Coward.

 

[Bostonian]

Facts over feelings brah

Look how long it took for Epstein and the likes of Weinstein to be exposed.

Seems one side is far better at cover ups.

Then again the party of the Kennedy's and Clintons has a long history of that.

 

[zill]

"Probably"

A real shame what you have devolved into mate. You used to present as fairly rational, these days there appears to be plenty of Q adjacent pedo retribution type fantasies creeping in

Relax, it was a joke. Mal was talking about age of consent laws that got changed 150 years ago, it just happened to be where Biden represented. He has been in office close to, but not quite, 150 years.

 

[zill]

Yup.

Trump appointees to lead both the FBI and DoJ, plus the prosecution running the gun case against Hunter who literally just entered the laptop into evidence. All corrupt and just covering up for the Bidens

And these guys object to being called cookers lol

Do you really think pollies are interested in prosecuting other pollies? They don't want to set a precedent or expectation that it is acceptable to do so. They are all dirty.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Relax, it was a joke. Mal was talking about age of consent laws that got changed 150 years ago, it just happened to be where Biden represented. He has been in office close to, but not quite, 150 years.

So you are saying that Biden fixed those horrible laws by raising the age of consent?

And you dislike him for that?

Meanwhile, Trump was lurking in the locker rooms of Miss Teen USA and flying around with Epstein. And you are telling us he is the good guy?

Something doesn’t quite add up zill.

 

[zill]

That's not Biden arguing for life sentences for crack smoking.

The laws with respect to crack cocaine possession (Federally) come from an Act passed by Reagan in 1986:



https://www.brennancenter.org/our-w...d-how-federal-funding-shapes-criminal-justice

What the 1994 Act that Biden was involved with did was ban drug users and people subject to restraining orders from getting a Firearm (along with other assault weapon bans), something Hunter has now done.

The 1994 Act was a compromise with the Republicans. The Dems wanted to push through their Assault weapons bans, and make owning firearms tougher. They rolled gun control into a ton of 'tough on crime' bill to appease the Republicans and get the bill through the House.

Biden was a sponsor of the anti drug abuse act.

And the crime bill gave incentives to the states for locking more people up for longer.

 

[Malifice]

Biden was a sponsor of the anti drug abuse act.

You're not anti drug abuse?

 

[bourbons]

Seems to be a lot of posters pom pom for Biden but won't admit it. It's always but Trump.

I go a bit hard on poor old EasternTiger, but at least he actually has the courage to own his Trump worship. Everyone else here of a conservative lean seems to defend Trump in just about every instance, yet pretend they don't actually like or support him.

Always very instructive when the convo is about the legals, holding Trump to account vs holding Joe/Hunter to account. Practically every left leaning poster on this thread is happy for both sides to be torn a new one legally speaking, whereas with the right wingers frothing at the mouth about the Bidens' avoidance of scrutiny, for dear leader its always witchunt this, politically motivated that, wah wah wah. This is despite the mountain of verified undisputed facts arrayed against Trump vs those against Biden, of course.

 

[bourbons]

Very wary of clicking links to nutjobs.

You don't even need to click it?

Just a quick way of posting Donnie's hilarious priming of the base for the unthinkable.

 

[bourbons]

Or you start changing the duopoly system.

Be a ****ing coward though.

Yep.

This election clearly being the time to start on that project