NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 2

[Kurve]

Here is US Politics - Pt 1

 

[bourbons]

Biden not being prosecuted doesn't mean there is no evidence of corruption on the laptop.

With Trump in charge and his 2 appointees running the DoJ and FBI in 2019 and 2020?

I'd suggest thats exactly what it means lol. And we haven't even got to the laptop literally being entered into evidence for Hunter's latest trial.

And Biden in the past has claimed credit for the crime bill. When he was running for president in 2008 he called it the 'Biden crime bill'. If you had read the vice article i had posted you would know that.

Yes yes mate, we know - Biden single-handedly wrote the thing and somehow forced it through a GOP controlled senate, we got it.

 

[bourbons]

View attachment 2032273

Easy to see who is the most "cooked" in this thread.

Mate, this is the best thread on BF. Some of the most awesome internet you will ever read.

I also enjoy rag-dolling you blokes around, you just make it so easy. Think of it as my own personal version of those clickbaity vids with titles like "MAGA destroyed with facts and logic"

Happy to acknowledge I'm addicted to it

 

[Bostonian]

Mate, this is the best thread on BF. Some of the most awesome internet you will ever read.

I also enjoy rag-dolling you blokes around, you just make it so easy. Think of it as my own personal version of those clickbaity vids with titles like "MAGA destroyed with facts and logic"

Happy to acknowledge I'm addicted to it

You're definitely cooked then.

 

[bourbons]

You're definitely cooked then.

Well I'm not arguing the Republicans are better than the Dems on voting rights yet but yep, hanging out here I'm probably well on the way lol

 

[Bostonian]

Well I'm not arguing the Republicans are better than the Dems on voting rights yet but yep, hanging out here I'm probably well on the way lol

Ok cooker.

 

[zill]

With Trump in charge and his 2 appointees running the DoJ and FBI in 2019 and 2020?

I'd suggest thats exactly what it means lol. And we haven't even got to the laptop literally being entered into evidence for Hunter's latest trial.


Yes yes mate, we know - Biden single-handedly wrote the thing and somehow forced it through a GOP controlled senate, we got it.

Once again you refuse to read anything i posted and just continue with your one track thoughts. There has been so much written about these bills and Biden, a quick google search will keep you occupied for weeks. But i know you won't do that, you never do.

 

[bourbons]

Ok cooker.

Ooof, right through the heart.

Gonna be tough getting to sleep tonight

 

[zill]

You're definitely cooked then.

He absolutely is if he thinks he is "ragdolling"anyone. Just posting pure drivel that 30 seconds on google could clear up.

 

[bourbons]

Once again you refuse to read anything i posted and just continue with your one track thoughts. There has been so much written about these bills and Biden, a quick google search will keep you occupied for weeks. But i know you won't do that, you never do.

Coz that always works out so well. Spent quite a few hours working through and engaging with your Oxford/15 minute city/climate lockdown links, end result was you still couldn't bring yourself to acknowledge "93% said no" was clear bullshit

 

[bourbons]

Just posting pure drivel that 30 seconds on google could clear up.

Yet somehow you never manage it.

Remember, the best you can do re: the laptop is

Because they are corrupt as well i suppose.

Just lol

 

[skipper kelly]

I did

Rundowns should include commentary on the source. Like say * known LW nutter.

 

[Bostonian]

Ooof, right through the heart.

Gonna be tough getting to sleep tonight

Sorry.

I thought I'd try out what it's like to post like an over inflated mod.

Feels dirty.

 

[bourbons]

Rundowns should include commentary on the source. Like say * known LW nutter.

I tend to focus on the content rather than the source in this cases like these - it was a straight quote attributed to Trump, not an opinion from the poster. Which is why I said it would be reasonable to google the quote itself to see if its real (it is), but the person posting it really has nothing to do with it.

Now, if the quote turned out to be fake, thats when you could declare the poster a LW nutter or whatever (although could have been just an honest mistake, its often difficult to determine fakes/satire in the Trump era lol), and pay out on me for being taken in by it as well.

I really should be charging you blokes, feels like I'm essentially just teaching critical thinking skills in here lately

 

[skipper kelly]

Might want to check out a few of my posts in SRP regarding Biden. Shocking cadidate who should be nowhere near the nomination, and is currently unconditionally supporting a genocide.

Noting obvious cookery to the cookers spouting it != supporting Biden. In the latest example, I'm simply reminding posters like lebbo and zill, who respectively still believe that there was clear evidence of pedo stuff and corruption on Hunter's laptop, that its pretty clear their narrative is bullshit, due to the fact that 2 Trump appointees heading their respective DoJ orgs had access to the thing for 12 months and no charges against Hunter materialised, at a time when that kind of thing is exactly what Trump as POTUS was trying to manufacture. I notice you've also ignored the 2nd paragraph of my post regarding closet Trumpers' distaste for dear leader facing any legal accountability for literally anything, ever, in sharp contrast to how lefties react to the possibility of legals impacting the Bidens.

Yet another good example on this very page. Though not exactly 'cooker' stuff, listening to zill's charachterisation you'd be forgiven for thinking that Biden single-handedly wrote the entire '94 crime bill (which is pretty shit, I agree) and somehow forced it through. Mal has presented facts in response to this detailing what is actually in the entire bill, how it came about and how it was passed by a Republican senate. This is also not "supporting Biden".

In short, reality has a liberal bias (since about 2016 anyway, for fairly obvious reasons).

I don't check posting history, probably have in the past, but I found it stalkerish when I saw others doing. You weren't one I was specifically referring to. From memory I thought you were a bit of a joker poster, and didn't take thing too serious.

I find zill, lebbo, boston, etc all post some very good stuff and worth reading on this board. Although I do find Mals posting entertaining at times, there's only so much one can take before a Billy Joel song starts ringing in the ears. Unlike him I do not wish any harm on people that I disagree with.

To repeat earlier posts, I find the behaviour of posting quite interesting. The forecasts in 2016 never eventuated so the phenomenon of anti-trump posting I find fascinating. Maybe I will accept it is what it is and move on. Anyway, this is the conspiracy board so best off sticking to conspiracies. As I said previously, Wittney Webb has some great research on govt corruption, without a bias that I can detect. All parties and sides are implicated. Great reading, or for me great listening.

 

[zill]

Yet somehow you never manage it.

Remember, the best you can do re: the laptop is

Just lol

You seem to think pollies want to make examples of other pollies, they don't. Outside of a few examples like trump, they all know what the rules are and stick to them. They don't want the tables turned on them in the future.

 

[skipper kelly]

I tend to focus on the content rather than the source in this cases like these - it was a straight quote attributed to Trump, not an opinion from the poster. Which is why I said it would be reasonable to google the quote itself to see if its real (it is), but the person posting it really has nothing to do with it.

Now, if the quote turned out to be fake, thats when you could declare the poster a LW nutter or whatever (although could have been just an honest mistake, its often difficult to determine fakes/satire in the Trump era lol), and pay out on me for being taken in by it as well.

I really should be charging you blokes, feels like I'm essentially just teaching critical thinking skills in here lately

Asking about the source is not paying out on you. Cmon. I clarified by stating that I don't click on links I don't know, I really only use twitter for Daily Fantasy Sports information, and I want to protect my RWNJ algorithm. I also have a thing about data collection so I am careful about what I click on. Probably silly and paranoid but so what. But, I do love me some good Biden falling up stairs compilation videos. The 2016 reaction compilations were also good at the time. I don't share them because some posters get enraged and that's annoying.

Anyway, I feel sufficiently admonished for my error so I won't ask again. And more importantly, this shit I am posting is not worth reading. Cheers.

 

[bourbons]

You seem to think pollies want to make examples of other pollies, they don't. Outside of a few examples like trump

Trump is the one we're talking about.

Let me know when you work out what your position is.

 

[bourbons]

Asking about the source is not paying out on you. Cmon. I clarified by stating that I don't click on links I don't know, I really only use twitter for Daily Fantasy Sports information, and I want to protect my RWNJ algorithm. I also have a thing about data collection so I am careful about what I click on. Probably silly and paranoid but so what. But, I do love me some good Biden falling up stairs compilation videos. The 2016 reaction compilations were also good at the time. I don't share them because some posters get enraged and that's annoying.

Anyway, I feel sufficiently admonished for my error so I won't ask again. And more importantly, this shit I am posting is not worth reading. Cheers.

The entire content of the post was contained in the embed, as it usually is when embedding twitter posts. You get nothing additional by clicking on it.

Unsure how I can make this any clearer.

 

[skipper kelly]

The entire content of the post was contained in the embed, as it usually is when embedding twitter posts. You get nothing additional by clicking on it.

Unsure how I can make this any clearer.

C'mon man, don't stress anymore about it, ok. It was a simple question for the reasons I explained.

 

[zill]

Coz that always works out so well. Spent quite a few hours working through and engaging with your Oxford/15 minute city/climate lockdown links, end result was you still couldn't bring yourself to acknowledge "93% said no" was clear bullshit

Still running with that? I never said that. And this is the US politics thread.

 

[bourbons]

Still running with that? I never said that. And this is the US politics thread.

Of course you did, just eye-watering dishonesty here.

Very Trumpian

 

[zill]

Trump is the one we're talking about.

Let me know when you work out what your position is.

Like i said, trump is an outlier. How many other pollies are getting dragged through the court system? Outside of sexual harassment like Clinton nothing much springs to mind.

 

[bourbons]

Like i said, trump is an outlier.

I know. And he's the one you're kinda sorta still trying to pretend didn't want to investigate Biden (after being on tape literally asking Zelensky to investigate Biden lol). Or perhaps he did, but the 2 blokes he appointed to lead the DoJ were corrupt, and thats why they ignored the clear evidence of corruption on Hunter's laptop.

Again, let me know when you work out exactly what your position here is. Its a mess currently.

 

[zill]

I know. And he's the one you're kinda sorta still trying to pretend didn't want to investigate Biden (after being on tape literally asking Zelensky to investigate Biden lol). Or perhaps he did, but the 2 blokes he appointed to lead the DoJ were corrupt, and thats why they ignored the clear evidence of corruption on Hunter's laptop.

Again, let me know when you work out exactly what your position here is. Its a mess currently.

How far did trump get? Nowhere, which is the point. No pollie is trying to get another pollie in court. Trump is an outlier, why is that so hard for you to undetstand?

 

[Malifice]

Still being disingenuous, or perhaps your cognitive dissonance kicking in. Biden had his hands all over these bills, and thought they didn't go far enough.

I didnt say he didnt have his hands all over them. He sponsored the bill.

I said the Bill (containing Billions of dollars of welfare measures to combat drug addiction) contained tough on crime provisions to pass a Republican controlled Senate and avoid Veto by Ronald Reagan.

Do you think Ronald Reagan would have let a bill pass that dished out billions in welfare to drug counselling services?

Yes or No will suffice.