NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Would you believe me if I told you that under Biden, the USA was the world leader in crude oil production?
That under Biden, the USA was hitting record levels of crude oil production?
Im aware but the situation isnt as it seems. It was filling up the reserves he crushed through as opposed to building his energy base around it. He flooded the market with cheap oil during cost of living issues and is replenishing it. His policy was not to use and rely on it. Just to store it as backup
 
It's not baseless - Trumps lies are well documented, there are thousands of them

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...isleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years/

That list is laughable. Not surprising considering it's the Washington Post.

Here's one of the so called lies.

Fact check #30,468​

“Somebody says, well, we have to obey the Constitution. And you are because you're protecting our country and you're protecting the Constitution. So you are. But think of what happens. Let's say they're stiffs and they're stupid people, and they say, well, we really have no choice.”

How is talking about a hypothetical situation counted as a lie?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That list is laughable. Not surprising considering it's the Washington Post.

Here's one of the so called lies.

Fact check #30,468​

“Somebody says, well, we have to obey the Constitution. And you are because you're protecting our country and you're protecting the Constitution. So you are. But think of what happens. Let's say they're stiffs and they're stupid people, and they say, well, we really have no choice.”

How is talking about a hypothetical situation counted as a lie?

Cherry picking 1 out of 30,000+ is a piss poor effort mate. Maybe ask cranky to give you a hand?
 
Im aware but the situation isnt as it seems. It was filling up the reserves he crushed through as opposed to building his energy base around it. He flooded the market with cheap oil during cost of living issues and is replenishing it. His policy was not to use and rely on it. Just to store it as backup
What?

No, produced.

Production of crude oil.

What's your understanding of the situation?
 
No he's quite representative of MAGA in this instance.

His J6/Antifa take is basically in line with Tucker Carlson, would have thought he's pretty relevant. Although Tuck has also thrown the FBI into the mix in addition to Antifa - basically anything to obfuscate the fact that Trump supporters did the action, as Sorbo is trying to do here.
Bit immature to decide who represents my thoughts and the like. Maybe I just represent myself yeah? Maybe HitsNailOnTheHead speaks for himself and doesnt have Kevin Sorbo do it for him?

You are not talking to me in good faith if someone elses opinion can be used to replace my own. Im not interested in doing the same so not sure why you wanna go that route.I believe you are smarter and better then that deep down so think you can probably put your mind to being that way if you tried to. Its less malicious and more I suppose laziness which happens to all of us I suppose

Just focus on what I say without bringing Kevin Sorbo into it. I think that is a fair request
 
Demonising it means changing it, not cancelling it. That parts been clear for a while.

Why would Kash Patels role exist if you want to defund it? Takes 15 seconds to defund something. Doesn’t need a human involved. Just stop giving it money. They are not doing that though
There'll be more than a few here disappointed to hear that.

We've been reliably informed here that any effort to re-structure, change or alter funding = defund the police. They don't take kindly to that sort of thing round these parts :tearsofjoy:
 
What?

No, produced.

Production of crude oil.

What's your understanding of the situation?
Production and use are two different subjects are they not? I want coal power and oil to be used and relied on as a long term base of our energy source, not just dug up from the ground

I think the question you are asking is wrong in the sense of the question to answer is less what was produced but more, how much is and was used?
 
There'll be more than a few here disappointed to hear that.

We've been reliably informed here that any effort to re-structure, change or alter funding = defund the police. They don't take kindly to that sort of thing round these parts :tearsofjoy:
Two wrongs dont make a right. Democrats dont want to defund the police either. If they did it would have happened already
 
That list is laughable. Not surprising considering it's the Washington Post.

Here's one of the so called lies.

Fact check #30,468​

“Somebody says, well, we have to obey the Constitution. And you are because you're protecting our country and you're protecting the Constitution. So you are. But think of what happens. Let's say they're stiffs and they're stupid people, and they say, well, we really have no choice.”

How is talking about a hypothetical situation counted as a lie?
Can you share the entire piece around that quote, please?
I can't find it.
 
Production and use are two different subjects are they not? I want coal power and oil to be used and relied on as a long term base of our energy source, not just dug up from the ground

I think the question you are asking is wrong in the sense of the question to answer is less what was produced but more, how much is and was used?
Sorry.

Is your position that under the Biden administration, that they were setting world records for crude oil production... and crude oil storage??


What?
Where was it being stored?
Where were these record level storage systems being build and employed???
 
:$

Scroll through the video you just posted to this point ...


I watched it.


He makes a joke about how he's holding up the Sugar Bowl. In the first 1/4 of his appearance there, giving the update and praising the New Orleans' spirit...

Did you watch that and genuinely take it as him complaining that he was going to miss it? And storming off, refusing to take questions????
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

If you believe a Trump supporter shot at Donald Trump I really don’t know what to tell you. It would be pointless to even try .
You decried someone ignoring an association with a political institution and cherry picking while implying a registered Republican was from the democrat "side of the fence".

Honestly mate this is pretty basic stuff :tearsofjoy:
 
Sorry.

Is your position that under the Biden administration, that they were setting world records for crude oil production... and crude oil storage??


What?
Where was it being stored?
Where were these record level storage systems being build and employed???
Ive done the research of it all at the time but cant find it since I stored it wrong in my spreadsheet, but basically he was replenishing the reserves he took from.

If you are both using and restoring reserves production will rise. It doesnt mean you are building or using oil/coal as your energy base however

Just like Australia is still producing a ton of coal production wise. Do you think coal will be relied upon as our energy base just because we are producing it?
 
You decried someone ignoring an association with a political institution and cherry picking while implying a registered Republican was from the democrat "side of the fence".

Honestly mate this is pretty basic stuff :tearsofjoy:
I foremost said political association can only be done on recency bias. Do you think if I shot up a building id be labelled a Biden supporter instead of a Trump supporter? I did support Biden in 2020 and wanted him to win as I said but wanted Trump to win in 2024

I was also a member of the Liberal Party in 2020 before I switched to One Nation

What political position would I be if I did this? Id like to think people would view me as a Trump/One Nation supporter and not a Biden/Dutton one
 
I watched it.


He makes a joke about how he's holding up the Sugar Bowl. In the first 1/4 of his appearance there, giving the update and praising the New Orleans' spirit...

Did you watch that and genuinely take it as him complaining that he was going to miss it? And storming off, refusing to take questions????
Do you think the joke is appropriate given the situation?
 
I watched it.


He makes a joke about how he's holding up the Sugar Bowl. In the first 1/4 of his appearance there, giving the update and praising the New Orleans' spirit...

Did you watch that and genuinely take it as him complaining that he was going to miss it? And storming off, refusing to take questions????

You can spin it whichever way you want. If I was a relative of one of the dead I would be sickened by him mentioning the sugar bowl and checking his watch after the furore he created when he checked it 13 times on another sad occasion.

 
Entirely possible seems like a man with confidence….

We went from Harris will win in a landslide to Democrats could possibly win in 2028 in the space of 2 months but only if they completely reinvent themselves and find a new leader …

I think this says a lot
And you'd be wrong about the complete re-invention part. As stated, driving factor was post-covid inflation and economy, which came through in issues polling time and time again.

Hell, once the policies are de-coupled from the party promoting them even Republicans preferred Harris' :drunk:


Thats why I said they could easily win by changing only 1 thing, their candidate. They might have even done the impossible and retained incumbency this time around if they'd done a proper primary and emerged with a battle tested candidate.
 
You can spin it whichever way you want. If I was a relative of one of the dead I would be sickened by him mentioning the sugar bowl and checking his watch after the furore he created when he checked it 13 times on another sad occasion.


To me the spinning of it is a even worse situation then what you claimed also

Id rather be incoherent about it, then joke about it.
 
Ive done the research of it all at the time but cant find it since I stored it wrong in my spreadsheet, but basically he was replenishing the reserves he took from.
Then your research at the time was wrong.

It wasn't taking from existing crude oil that had already been produced.
This was record breaking levels of production of NEW crude oil...

Think about what you're actually trying to argue here...

That RECORD LEVELS of crude oil... were already there, in storage?

You think companies like BP, Chevron, Shell etc... are just... putting it away in storage, not selling it?
That they've had it sitting in storage, and now they're bringing it out of storage to put into different storage?!? At RECORD LEVELS???

I can't do this today. I'm out.

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=61545
1735952902440.png


The United States produced more crude oil than any nation at any time, according to our International Energy Statistics, for the past six years in a row. Crude oil production in the United States, including condensate, averaged 12.9 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2023, breaking the previous U.S. and global record of 12.3 million b/d, set in 2019. Average monthly U.S. crude oil production established a monthly record high in December 2023 at more than 13.3 million b/d.​
The crude oil production record in the United States in 2023 is unlikely to be broken in any other country in the near term because no other country has reached production capacity of 13.0 million b/d. Saudi Arabia’s state-owned Saudi Aramco recently scrapped plans to increase production capacity to 13.0 million b/d by 2027.​
 
And you'd be wrong about the complete re-invention part. As stated, driving factor was post-covid inflation and economy, which came through in issues polling time and time again.

Hell, once the policies are de-coupled from the party promoting them even Republicans preferred Harris' :drunk:


Thats why I said they could easily win by changing only 1 thing, their candidate. They might have even done the impossible and retained incumbency this time around if they'd done a proper primary and emerged with a battle tested candidate.
The London Economic. Blimey

Driving factor was Hispanic vote went against him. The who/what/why is a little blurred because the pollsters got it so insanely wrong, its pretty tough to take them as a source of information.

I think the who/what/why isnt as established as any news article wants to represent. If it was to be established, their polls would have been a lot more accurate then they were
 
Do you think the joke is appropriate given the situation?
Yes.

He is making fun of himself during his speech about how amazing New Orleans are that they're able to move forward through such tragedy, and continue to live their lives.


I don't give a shit about virtue signalers on this.
You don't care. You don't actually take issue with what he said. Because if it actually meant something to you, you'd hold Trump to account for the more egregious jokes he's made.

But it's not about what was said, it's about who said it.
Biden bad.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top