Doss
Ass
- Aug 1, 2011
- 75,222
- 112,368
- AFL Club
- Essendon
I suspect it's a concession that limited disclosure is better than nothing because total radio silence, particularly in these days of the 24 hour news cycle, will just lead to speculation growing out of control. Way more so than it has so far.What I don't understand, is that unless there's something in the contracts they sign with Cricket Australia or their state, who has given the medical staff the ok to disclose medical information about Hughes to the media / public?