-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Viagra, Valium, and traces of Ectasy and Cocaine
- Thread starter bomberboy5
- Start date
- Tagged users None
The Majestic
Embracing the chaos.
He was embarrassed needing viagra to have a quickie in the backseat?
There was a doco on this recently (coincidence?). 80% (of notes) had 'traces' of illicit drugs embedded in the tiny tiny plastic fibers.
Viagra?
Definately a drug/sex thing.
Chick's mate was caught with drugs.
You do the math..
I can't believe so many are defending this junked up tosser.
Definately a drug/sex thing.
Chick's mate was caught with drugs.
You do the math..
I can't believe so many are defending this junked up tosser.
Even the guilty have a right to natural justice
Very few deny Cousins is a twit - what many (even non-WCE fans) are arguing is that he was denied justice.
FWIW - he should have been sacked for simply bring more controversy to the game = but that doesn't mean he is guilty of this crime
- Banned
- #57
Totally agree. We all know he is a drug user. But this does not mean the law applies any differently to him. The case against Cousins in this instance is getting weaker and weaker
IIRC;
the police originally stated he was pulled over because he was seen to be driving erratically (by 2 cars full of organised crime detectives),
the police indicated he was charged with refusing a blood/urine test, only for that to be retracted and replaced with a failure to undertake a drug assessment
the police charged him with having a prohibited substance, only for the DPP to throw the charge out and
now the police state that a number of drugs and traces of drugs were found in the car, but no charges have yet been laid, because the police have yet to determine their 'ownership'.
According to the WA police website http://www.police.wa.gov.au/ABOUTUS/tabid/893/Default.aspx
their aim is Improved confidence and trust of the community and having The right people, in the right place, at the right time, doing the right things.
the police originally stated he was pulled over because he was seen to be driving erratically (by 2 cars full of organised crime detectives),
the police indicated he was charged with refusing a blood/urine test, only for that to be retracted and replaced with a failure to undertake a drug assessment
the police charged him with having a prohibited substance, only for the DPP to throw the charge out and
now the police state that a number of drugs and traces of drugs were found in the car, but no charges have yet been laid, because the police have yet to determine their 'ownership'.
According to the WA police website http://www.police.wa.gov.au/ABOUTUS/tabid/893/Default.aspx
their aim is Improved confidence and trust of the community and having The right people, in the right place, at the right time, doing the right things.
chopper41
Club Legend
It's a good question, and would be usable in court.....but i think we all know the answer to where that can from.
- Banned
- #62
Border security (the TV show) all U.S notes have traces of cocaine mostly.
It's unusual if they dont.
- Oct 3, 2007
- 789
- 936
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Chief Wiggum would be better than the WA police.
you idiots.....
So let me get this straight.. based on the bits of info that have been surfacing since he was arrested:
-Was not driving the car?
-Drug possession charge based on only a few Valiums on his person?
-Other, harder drugs found in the car, but can only assume they belonged to the other passesgers as he wasn't charged for it?
-Lengthy, very public search of vehicles obviously didn't yield the results they wanted/expected, otherwise i'd assume they wouldn't bother testing for traces of drugs on notes? (i'm ****ing bemused by this, surely that is so weak as evidence that probably wouldnt be accepted in court..)
-Asked for a breath test which was given, even though it has been reported that he wasn't the driver?
-Is it safe to assume that he does actually have a script for the Valium if the charges are dropped?
-Arrest seemed like a planned sting?
-Media tipped off as well to top it all off
-And then questioned for 7 hours or something....
Just what the **** is going on?
Also, does anyone know if it was actually his car or someone elses?
-Was not driving the car?
-Drug possession charge based on only a few Valiums on his person?
-Other, harder drugs found in the car, but can only assume they belonged to the other passesgers as he wasn't charged for it?
-Lengthy, very public search of vehicles obviously didn't yield the results they wanted/expected, otherwise i'd assume they wouldn't bother testing for traces of drugs on notes? (i'm ****ing bemused by this, surely that is so weak as evidence that probably wouldnt be accepted in court..)
-Asked for a breath test which was given, even though it has been reported that he wasn't the driver?
-Is it safe to assume that he does actually have a script for the Valium if the charges are dropped?
-Arrest seemed like a planned sting?
-Media tipped off as well to top it all off
-And then questioned for 7 hours or something....
Just what the **** is going on?
Also, does anyone know if it was actually his car or someone elses?
Moo
Premium Platinum
Look I accept the civil rights debate here and that can be played out in court ......but do any of the Eagle fans here believe this extends to his contract with the club?
He was on thin ice and he drove across this ice in a 4WD as far as I am concerned.
He shouldn't have had an M&M on him as far as I am concerned and instead of gangsta cruising he should of been avoiding the situations that cause relapse- everything about Cousins screams a man who is still descending.
Sacking Cousins remains the only sensible decision the Eagles have made in this whole debacle in the past 5 years.
He was on thin ice and he drove across this ice in a 4WD as far as I am concerned.
He shouldn't have had an M&M on him as far as I am concerned and instead of gangsta cruising he should of been avoiding the situations that cause relapse- everything about Cousins screams a man who is still descending.
Sacking Cousins remains the only sensible decision the Eagles have made in this whole debacle in the past 5 years.
Keele
Club Legend
Collingwood Magpies - Alan Didak 2010 Player Sponsor
Collingwood Magpies - Alan Didak 2009 Player Sponsor
Good point
And of course the greedy little whore kept all the drugs to herself and Benny the wonder boy didnt have any at all.
West Coast supporters are, without doubt, the most stupidly naive people on the planet.
No mate, your just part of the disgraceful LYNCH mob.
He has been found guilty of nothing.
Thanks for clearing that up! So does that make Ben a certain client? Or was he just catching a ride?
jenny61_99
Premium Platinum
My understanding (which is getting more vague by the minute) is that the Kluger WAS Cousin's car. Now we are getting conflicting evidence that one of the girls was driving the car (which Im sure the sponsors would be thrilled about). How could the cops ask Ben to take a driving assessment (blood test) if he wasn't driving?
This is just ridiculous.
How could the cops ask Ben to take a driving assessment (blood test) if he wasn't driving? This is just ridiculous.
My understanding (which is getting more vague by the minute) is that the Kluger WAS Cousin's car. Now we are getting conflicting evidence that one of the girls was driving the car (which Im sure the sponsors would be thrilled about).
This is just ridiculous.
I couldn't agree more. Some straight forward facts would be welcomed.
- Banned
- #75
No drugs found on the person Ben Cousins, all were in the car for everyone to see when pulled over
Similar threads
