Mega Thread VICBias - Genuine Discussion

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

The NGA system shows vic bias more than anything

Vic sides got indigenous players from Vic , NT, Tasmania.
12 months later sa and wa teams got indigenous players from one small corner of there state.

Then 3 years later they get the entire state but only after pick 40.

This is 100% vic bias. The reason was vic clubs were worried sa and waclubs may get an advantage which may neutralise some of the advantages they already get and the VFL said yes.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Way to he deliberately misleading.

150 games from any player playing in the WAFL. easily way more eligible fathers than 100 games for 1 club.

Father/son is just a game of luck. Some clubs seems to have a tonne of them, others have had barely any.
This is how a star player gets 150 games in the wafl:

F1BBFB7A-0BEF-4E6E-A388-CBC234FC5D66.jpeg 3F7C2CB5-3AC9-447A-B42D-5B473A13B06F.jpeg


Played 67 games for geelong - earnt father son.

Needed 150 games in the wafl.


THESE THINGS ARE NOT THE SAME.
 
This is how a star player gets 150 games in the wafl:

View attachment 1819017View attachment 1819018


Played 67 games for geelong - earnt father son.

Needed 150 games in the wafl.


THESE THINGS ARE NOT THE SAME.
It's their competition, they can do what they want.
You should be thankful it's only 150 WAFL, which is equivalent to 3 reserves appearances in the VFL.

Right, Vics?
 
The palpable anger on social media about the gf bullshit is building. Facebook, reddit and quora blowing up.

People are just getting more and more sick of Victorian dominance and the AFL and AFL medias complete indifference to it, especially compared to their reaction of a much smaller period of dominance from non-Victorian teams 18 or 19 years ago.

The AFL media would be losing their shit, as would the AFL if non-Victorian teams had won 15 of the last 17 Grand Finals.
 
This is how a star player gets 150 games in the wafl:

View attachment 1819017View attachment 1819018


Played 67 games for geelong - earnt father son.

Needed 150 games in the wafl.


THESE THINGS ARE NOT THE SAME.
Eagles have had 6 father son picks.
North melbourne 6
St kilda 5
Brisbane 5
Port Adelaide 5
Hawthorn 4

The higher minimum game requirements cancel out the fact that SANFL and WAFL clubs get the entire league to pick from.

Would you rather it be 100 games but you could only pick kids from West Perth players?
 
Eagles have had 6 father son picks.
North melbourne 6
St kilda 5
Brisbane 5
Port Adelaide 5
Hawthorn 4

The higher minimum game requirements cancel out the fact that SANFL and WAFL clubs get the entire league to pick from.

Would you rather it be 100 games but you could only pick kids from West Perth players?

How about a ****en system, where the top 7 sides favoured by the rule are not all victorian



Row LabelsCount of Drafted player
Collingwood
17​
Geelong
14​
Carlton
10​
Essendon
9​
Richmond
8​
Western Bulldogs
7​
Melbourne
7​
North Melbourne
6​
West Coast
6​
Sydney
5​
Port Adelaide
5​
Brisbane Lions
5​
Hawthorn
4​
St Kilda
3​
Adelaide
3​
Footscray
2​
Fitzroy
1​
Fremantle
1​



85 for Victoria
20 for non victoria
 
Last edited:
Eagles have had 6 father son picks.
North melbourne 6
St kilda 5
Brisbane 5
Port Adelaide 5
Hawthorn 4

The higher minimum game requirements cancel out the fact that SANFL and WAFL clubs get the entire league to pick from.

Would you rather it be 100 games but you could only pick kids from West Perth players?
West perth players should be loaded onto dump trucks and dumped at the tip.


We got 4 clubs.

But again the best althletically gifted players most likely to have the best chance of passing on good genetics never played 150 games in the wafl.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top