now thats a good question. whats the chance hes sup player?Will Kyle Riemers be receiving an apology?
bahhahahha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
now thats a good question. whats the chance hes sup player?Will Kyle Riemers be receiving an apology?
First he was door-knocking looking for members, now he'll doing the same thing looking for players.Worsfold must be rapt with 2016 so far.
BTW there wasn't enough for a unanimous decision. 3/6 judges thought that they more likely didn't, 1/6 thought that some probably did, but wasn't comfortable with others, 2/6 thought they all must have used it based on this beautiful piece of logic:There was enough evidence for a unanimous decision that the players took tb4. It's just you can't accept it.
WADA brought in young who has a 100% success rate.
so you're saying it would mean I would get rid of Ings and Chip for the low low price of the utter humiliation and possibly extermination of my club? Hmm, temptingNo more Chip....No more Ings
To what aim? The verdict simply says that it's more likely than not that players took TB4 and that players didn't do enough to discharge their obligations under the code. There is still no actual proof of TB4 use, the test that they developed was thrown out. There is still no admission of TB4 use, the bloke who's meant to have given them TB4 still says that he didn't use it.
We are in the same position as supporters as we were before, except that the players received the benefit of the doubt at the tribunal and didn't receive the same benefit at CAS.
has he decided on the proper forum to clear the players yet the scamp?
Will Kyle Riemers be receiving an apology?
Why not. After all it's with "Our ABC".James Hird is doing a live 50 minute interview at The Ethics Centre.
You cannot make this stuff up.
Footy Classified is on tonight after the cricket
Footy Classified @FootyClassified 33m33 minutes ago
With the special edition of #FootyClassified TONIGHT after the cricket, what questions do YOU want answered?
Would be a great looking kid.
No idea, but I still laugh every time I see this interview:
BTW there wasn't enough for a unanimous decision. 3/6 judges thought that they more likely didn't, 1/6 thought that some probably did, but wasn't comfortable with others, 2/6 thought they all must have used it based on this beautiful piece of logic:
"For Mr Dank to have arbitrarily omitted to give any player injection of Thymosin would have made no sense".
I would suggest on that line we are below balance of probabilities as a standard of proof.
James Hird is a disgrace, should now just close his mouth, done nothing but hurt Essendon more and more
His "knight in shining armor" moment is going to be SOOOO epic!has he decided on the proper forum to clear the players yet the scamp?
McDevitt on 7:30 tonight
Dank speaks:
Essendon player ban is laughable and based on no evidence, says Stephen Dank
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...ays-stephen-dank/story-fni5f6kw-1227706358387
1. Told not to - why do you think players would be told not to tell anti doping authorities about specific supplements.
2. All the more reason to disclose, wouldn't you think?
Where? New Zealand!What about possible ramifications of trying to grow the game internationally?