![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/geelong.png)
- Apr 3, 2006
- 34,185
- 12,828
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Semi Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I am glad the only person (I believe) to be hurt and killed in the Tel Aviv terrorist bomb was the only one who deserved it.
Not really - you just don't like what I post, and the fact I keep highlighting your ignorance, but I don't hate you at all. I think you're probably a good person.
It really sounds like you're justifying the bombing of civilians in Palestine, because Jews were being persecuted in Europe? I struggle to see how this makes sense - but surely that's not what you're doing anyway.
Wait are you now critical of attempts to "contextualise", justify or excuse terrorism? Welcome aboardDemons09 How quick you went from having no idea of Zionist terrorist history, to giving it the thumbs up!
View attachment 2084631
Must be a new record.
Your presentation, omission and misrepresentation of facts provides and indication of your hatefulness.
Holocaust = 'persecution'?
your side.
Like supporting a football team.Can't help yourself can you.
Your side of the debate constantly offers up reasons sounding very similar to ZEVs for terrorism. Now we've established its probably not something we should do, hopefully we hear less of it.Can't help yourself can you.
Your side
You okay?There it is again
You okay?
Thats great. What is troubling you about "your side"? Do you disagree that you, GP and Lunch Lady have all been arguing from the anti-Israeli side of the debate for the majority of this discussion?I am well, thank you for asking.
Thats great. What is troubling you about "your side"? Do you disagree that you, GP and Lunch Lady have all been arguing from the anti-Israeli side of the debate for the majority of this discussion?
Anti-Hamas, anti-disinformation.You seem opposed to this humanitarian approach. So how would you describe your side Jazny?
Anti-Hamas, anti-disinformation.
Does this Heritage Minister guy tick both of those boxes for you?
Thats great. What is troubling you about "your side"? Do you disagree that you, GP and Lunch Lady have all been arguing from the anti-Israeli side of the debate for the majority of this discussion?
I wonder if there has been a single time you have pushed back against anything GP or Lunchlady has said. If you can show me an example of this, I will admit I am wrong to characterise you guys as being on the same side. I have pushed back on multiple things said by the pro-Israel side. Its not me who acts like its a team sport. You just don't like a term I used.Once again, you can’t comprehend anything other than this being a team sport.
I wonder if there has been a single time you have pushed back against anything GP or Lunchlady has said. If you can show me an example of this, I will admit I am wrong to characterise you guys as being on the same side. I have pushed back on multiple things said by the pro-Israel side. Its not me who acts like its a team sport. You just don't like a term I used.
This just comes across as a weird projection. I can show a number of times I have argued against the people supposedly on my team. You apparently can't show any. Wouldn't that be odd if I'm the one acting like it's a team sport?There's heaps of things I haven't responded to, from both sides.
You very much act like it's a team sport.
Apart from saying "your side" how else do I act like this is a team sport?
OK so it's just my use of "your side" for your basis that I "very much act like it's a team sport". Got it. We can move on. How should I collectively refer to you guys who all share very similar opinions, like each others posts and never pushback on each other in the future?Repeating 'your side' constantly is a pretty good indicator.
You're somewhat less biased than ZEV, I'll give you that much. But that's a very low bar.
According to Ynet, in any ceasefire deal arrangement, Sinwar wants guarantees for his safety.