Weitering on Toby Greene, is he in trouble?

Remove this Banner Ad

*correction, once back in July

Jul 3, 2023, 07:03 PM

Key defender Jacob Weitering has been cleared of his striking charge in a major boost for Carlton ahead of Sunday's AFL match against Fremantle. Weitering was booked during the third term of Sunday's win over Hawthorn at the MCG for striking ruckman Lloyd Meek off the ball.

You mean 'zero', he hasn't been to the tribunal once.
 
You mean 'zero', he hasn't been to the tribunal once.

A nuance, that was still reviewed. Back to my original response that it could go either way - fine or a week.
 
A nuance, that was still reviewed. Back to my original response that it could go either way - fine or a week.
So you've gone from 'fronted the tribunal a few times' to 'one incident was reviewed by the MRO and nothing came of it'...okay...a nuance for sure.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

It was for a second while protecting his team mate. Unintentional but everyone will gaslight in favour of Greene.

Protecting his team mate is not an excuse and you know it - you are solely basing your argument on defending the player of your guernsey choice no matter what.

The only argument Weitering has is the time frame of the contact I.e. arguing it is incidental contact v an actual eye gouge.

Your series of comments in here are blatantly bias and completely miss the point, and you know that you would not blame a Carlton player if he were in Greenes situation.

He was dragging the thug off his teammate. Who had his arm locked around his neck.

Nothing in it. If anything Greene needs a week off.

It was for a second while protecting his team mate. Unintentional but everyone will gaslight in favour of Greene.

Arms for 99% of it.

Hilarious to have a fainting spell over one frame.

View attachment 1787674

Where is Greene's left arm? For the whole time?

View attachment 1787686

Doing that, then pretending he was then innocent party.

Greene's a clever psycho. Not much he won't do chasing an advantage.

Greene has done something that happens 10-15 times a game - player is held onto around the head after a tackle.

Weitering has done something that happens 2-3 times a year - contact with an eye outside of general play.
 
Not really a gouge. If you watch it in real time (rather than the super slow mo that everyone is posting), it was just a messy scramble to pull Toby off Gov.
Still don't see how he doesn't get a week, although hoping for a fine.

Wasn't a choke hold, but was a pretty strong headlock. You can see the force Toby is holding on with and highlighted by the fact that when Weitering drags Toby off, it also drags Gov with it.
Just performed a dangerous tackle, then refused to let go of a forceful headlock, while acting like the victim.

Oh **** me, a “forceful” headlock but Weitering just did a messy scramble?

Genuinely please - knowing full well I’ve said I’m happy if it’s a fine because it’s clearly incidental contact so I’m not just on an anti Carlton bus - PLEASE tell me you are absolutely sure you would have this view if the roles were reversed?!

You wouldn’t.
 
You seem very invested in this 'discussion' - I guess that is all you Nor(f)th Melbourne types have to feel relevant. Sad and a tad pathetic really.
great to see the ever humble and grounded carlton supporter base up and about after making finals for the first time in a decade
 
Oh * me, a “forceful” headlock but Weitering just did a messy scramble?

Genuinely please - knowing full well I’ve said I’m happy if it’s a fine because it’s clearly incidental contact so I’m not just on an anti Carlton bus - PLEASE tell me you are absolutely sure you would have this view if the roles were reversed?!

You wouldn’t.
Knowing full well that I said it's likely a week, watch the full speed replays. Watch Weitering, then watch Toby.
It's clear that Weitering is scrambling to try and drag Toby off his teammate.
It's clear that Toby isn't responding to the umpire and when Weitering tries to drag him off, he tightens his grip and refuses to let go.

The next step for Weitering was the finger up the bum. That's how you get a rabid dog to release when it isn't responding to commands.
 
He's trying to pull the guy off from behind and makes contact around his eye region for 0.1s and immediately moves away. Barely anything in this.
Serious question...

If he intentionally made contact to the face, as you described, and as a result he inadvertently makes contact with his eye - doesn't that constitute 'intentional'?

Let me rephrase that...

Is it the act that is deemed intentional, or the result?

Like if you bump someone, and inadvertently give them whiplash - because the bump was intentional - you get done right? You don't get off because you didn't intentionally give them whiplash?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Deliberately makes contact to the face, and furthermore he eye gouges Green.

Should be an open and shut case, a few weeks off. However Blues are the new Bulldogs and it’s finals, so he’ll get off.

AFL and integrity don’t exactly go together.
 
Protecting his team mate is not an excuse and you know it - you are solely basing your argument on defending the player of your guernsey choice no matter what.
Protecting his team mate is an excuse for dragging Greene away.

The only argument Weitering has is the time frame of the contact I.e. arguing it is incidental contact v an actual eye gouge.

And it was incidental contact for a fraction of a second.

Your series of comments in here are blatantly bias and completely miss the point, and you know that you would not blame a Carlton player if he were in Greenes situation.
:shrug: If Greene did it, then I would assume he meant it because he has form for viciously attacking incapacitated players' heads.

Weitering has no form on this sort of thing.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Weitering on Toby Greene, is he in trouble?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top