Incident should be dealt with on its own merits not the name of the person committing it.Zorko has prior reputation for being an utter p***k on field, Weiters has always been regarded as a clean and fair player
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Incident should be dealt with on its own merits not the name of the person committing it.Zorko has prior reputation for being an utter p***k on field, Weiters has always been regarded as a clean and fair player
It did more damage than what Zorko did, & he had to sit out a week:Can you show the footage where Weitering actually gouged his eye?
Swap roles and it still would've been a fine, there was nothing in it.
What damage did he actually do?It did more damage than what Zorko did, & he had to sit out a week:
Why Hodge would be disappointed if Brisbane did not contest Zorko ban
The Lions veteran has copped a one-match suspension.www.sen.com.au
Greene copped a week for a similar 'making contact to the eye region' offence in a 2019 final as well that caused no injury:
Superstar Giant banned for unreasonable contact to eye region
Toby Greene has been hit with a one-match banwww.afl.com.au
No consistency at all.
You've just posted two clips of guys trying to dig to China through peoples eyes to cop suspensions. This literally proves Weitering is nowhere near a suspension.It did more damage than what Zorko did, & he had to sit out a week:
Why Hodge would be disappointed if Brisbane did not contest Zorko ban
The Lions veteran has copped a one-match suspension.www.sen.com.au
Greene copped a week for a similar 'making contact to the eye region' offence in a 2019 final as well that caused no injury:
Superstar Giant banned for unreasonable contact to eye region
Toby Greene has been hit with a one-match banwww.afl.com.au
No consistency at all.
He bled mm's from his eye from a Carlton player making contact there. If that doesn't warrant a week then neither should the others in recent times is all I'm saying.What damage did he actually do?
You do realise that bleed is from something else and on the other side of his face, right?
You said Weitering caused more damage than your other example?He bled mm's from his eye from a Carlton player making contact there. If that doesn't warrant a week then neither should the others in recent times is all I'm saying.
Yeah, 'scooping' with straight fingers above and below the eye.So Weitering tries to scoop Greene’s eyes out and gets a fine and Bedford’s tackle causes no injury and he misses a final. These guys are having a laugh.
GWS is the over-punished child of the AFL.
Poor choice of words.If there is no case to answer why did he get fined.? That doesn't make sense.
No need for statements like that rubbish. Talk about the issue not personal attacks.You're struggling to see the difference? Seriously?
Zorko had him pinned to the ground, was on top of him and made an unnatural reach to his face from under his armpit and a pinching motion with his fingers around the eyes. If you're struggling with that, you probably shouldn't operate a vehicle on the road (assuming you do - maybe you don't).
I'm not taking any of this seriously. I'm having fun with the melts, WHILE being happy with the result.Taking it way too seriously dude. “Weiters” got off for eye gouging, you should be happy.
How can you say this with a straight face after saying you see no difference between the two?Incident should be dealt with on its own merits not the name of the person committing it.
He must have a magic hand if he can cause bleeding on the other side of his face to where the contact was madeHe bled mm's from his eye from a Carlton player making contact there. If that doesn't warrant a week then neither should the others in recent times is all I'm saying.
I guess he must have had a razor blade hidden in his sock. Future WWE champion Toby Greene.He must have a magic hand if he can cause bleeding on the other side of his face to where the contact was made
Mate seriously, I asked what the difference between the incidents was and the other user replied "Zorko has prior reputation for being an utter p***k on field, Weiters has always been regarded as a clean and fair player"How can you say this with a straight face after saying you see no difference between the two?
This one WAS dealt with on its merits, EXACTLY how you claim you want it, but you aren't happy?!?
He was fined for a poor choice of words?Poor choice of words.
You made some stupid statements. I questioned your ability to perform simple tasks.No need for statements like that rubbish. Talk about the issue not personal attacks.
one was careless/low impact/high contact and the other was careless/medium impact/high contact, you call that vastly different?You made some stupid statements. I questioned your ability to perform simple tasks.
If you don't want to open yourself up to ridicule, use better judgement.
The two incidents that you struggled to see the difference with, were VASTLY different.
Just because they have the words 'eye' and 'hand' doesn't make them the same.
Well, Toby gave away a free for a dangerous tackle that WASN'T cited.Mate seriously, I asked what the difference between the incidents was and the other user replied "Zorko has prior reputation for being an utter p***k on field, Weiters has always been regarded as a clean and fair player"
and i was responding to that comment.
You'd hope if roles were reversed Greene would get the same outcome but who could say that confidently.
The actions and circumstances were. That's why they were graded differently. Don't use the MRO gradings as a reason for them being similar. There's very little wriggle room in the gradings.one was careless/low impact/high contact and the other was careless/medium impact/high contact, you call that vastly different?
How many incidents are graded intentional? Not that I think this was intentional.Looked intentional to me. Should have been a week. Isn’t though. Not surprised. At least the MRO are consistently inconsistent.