- May 4, 2013
- 5,018
- 10,918
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
I think his disposal has improved massively.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're talking about players from 15 years ago though.I think a quality tagger is a weapon - Brett Kirk and Cameron Ling come to mind as players who can just completely nullify the best midfielder in a side. It takes enormous pressure off the rest of our midfield and forces teams to find a plan B. Nope too valuable to throw and will definitely be snapped up by someone else (Sydney and stKilda won't believe their lucky stars of we let him go
Spot on. I think it's not overly difficult to find a midfielder that can blanket an opposition player and still have a substantial impact the other way - that's what Finn is up against.You're talking about players from 15 years ago though.
The game has changed, every player needs to be dangerous and useful.
We play the Pies soon.. He blankets Daicos he stays. He's still young plenty of development left.i think having a bloke that can come in and completely blanket the opposition's best player is a pretty useful situational weapon
even if he doesn't evolve from here i think it's a valuable use of a late list spot. not every player 30-44 needs to be young and dedeveloping we play
That's not what you're arguing about Ned Reeves in the gameday thread.You're talking about players from 15 years ago though.
The game has changed, every player needs to be dangerous and useful.
That’s actually exactly what I’m arguing in the game day thread.That's not what you're arguing about Ned Reeves in the gameday thread.
Finn also has an exceptionally elite trait that he hasn't quite converted into a threat yet. Same principle.
"Shadow a player"? That's a pretty disingenuous way of describing his tagging performances. He made Kelly a non-factor in last weeks game. And he's done the same to quite a few influential players last year.That’s actually exactly what I’m arguing in the game day thread.
Reeves’ ability at the stoppages gives us an advantage in a key area of the ground each week.
Maginness can run around and shadow a player and that’s about it.
That’s pretty much what’s been said about Reeves most weeks."Shadow a player"? That's a pretty disingenuous way of describing his tagging performances. He made Kelly a non-factor in last weeks game. And he's done the same to quite a few influential players last year.
It'd be like someone saying all Reeves does is plod around and gets hitouts and that's about it.
I'm not Finn's biggest fan but the he kept a bloke who averages almost 29 possessions a game this year to 6, while also having 15 himself. That is an incredible game.That’s actually exactly what I’m arguing in the game day thread.
Reeves’ ability at the stoppages gives us an advantage in a key area of the ground each week.
Maginness can run around and shadow a player and that’s about it.
It is a great game. Still don’t know if there’s a future for him playing that role each week, as we’ll begin to trust our own offensive weapons more as the team develops and players like MacKenzie and Weddle start to punish the opposition with their ball use.I'm not Finn's biggest fan but the he kept a bloke who averages almost 29 possessions a game this year to 6, while also having 15 himself. That is an incredible game.
I know it is. And it's overly simplistic and undersells the great value Reeve's strengths provide. But it's also exactly what you've done here by saying Maginness just runs around shadowing a player. When in reality his proven tagging ability can essentially take the oppositions best midfielder out of the game completely.That’s pretty much what’s been said about Reeves most weeks.
Maginness is almost solely a run-with player. He barely gets the ball himself and when he does he doesn’t really have any tricks.
When the whips are cracking we’ll want every player who runs through the middle to be capable of being offensive and dangerous with ball in hand.
That’s actually exactly what I’m arguing in the game day thread.
Reeves’ ability at the stoppages gives us an advantage in a key area of the ground each week.
Maginness can run around and shadow a player and that’s about it.
1. No, not really.1. You don’t think that blanketing Josh Kelly to 6 touches is an elite trait?
2. The potential advantage provided by Reeves is not actually turning into a reality for the team.
I’m a huge reeves fan, but the Mginness is giving more to the team than Ned right now, and they both have the potential to grow even more going forward.
I can see where that might happen, but I also see a future where he’s not required.I know it is. And it's overly simplistic and undersells the great value Reeve's strengths provide. But it's also exactly what you've done here by saying Maginness just runs around shadowing a player. When in reality his proven tagging ability can essentially take the oppositions best midfielder out of the game completely.
It doesn't make him best 22, and I'm certainly not advocating for him to get a game every week (or even most weeks) just to do tagging job on someone. But I do think being that good (perhaps even the best in the league) at a specialist role that effectively eliminates the impact of a key opposition midfielder earns him more time on the list to show he could be more.
I suspect that in today's world every AFL player is capable of being offensive to someone...That’s pretty much what’s been said about Reeves most weeks.
Maginness is almost solely a run-with player. He barely gets the ball himself and when he does he doesn’t really have any tricks.
When the whips are cracking we’ll want every player who runs through the middle to be capable of being offensive and dangerous with ball in hand.