grumbleguts
User name to post ratio checks out
You can blame him for loving them.Can't blame the bloke for going back to the club he loves.
And the chance to be a part of that clubs' second only flag would have to be a pretty strong pull too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You can blame him for loving them.Can't blame the bloke for going back to the club he loves.
And the chance to be a part of that clubs' second only flag would have to be a pretty strong pull too.
He’s just not a negotiatorCan't believe that MM didn't get a better deal.....
This is dizzy stuff.I have heard he was born and raised in Bay 13 though
Agreed - like being the head coach of the club. That’s his job.Will he be replaced?
While Sam would be terrific as a mid field coach, I think most of his time would be focused on other areas of coaching.
There are a few highly credentialed recently retired players we could sound out. In no particular order. No idea if they are coaching elsewhere.
Robbie Gray
Dan Hannebery
Josh Kennedy
Marc Murphy
Stephen Hill
Nathan Jones
Could you articulate exactly what the problem is with Hannebery becoming a coach.
“How is he highly credentialed”, would be the question.Could you articulate exactly what the problem is with Hannebery becoming a coach.
I would think that his achievements meet that easily and are better the vast majority of players.“How is he highly credentialed”, would be the question.
Robbie Gray back at Port in a development role I think, or potentially list managementWill he be replaced?
While Sam would be terrific as a mid field coach, I think most of his time would be focused on other areas of coaching.
There are a few highly credentialed recently retired players we could sound out. In no particular order. No idea if they are coaching elsewhere.
Robbie Gray
Dan Hannebery
Josh Kennedy
Marc Murphy
Stephen Hill
Nathan Jones
I would think that his achievements meet that easily and are better the vast majority of players.
2010 Rising Star Award
2012 Premiership
Under 22 team 2012, 2013
All-Australian team 3 times, 2013, 2015, 2016
2015 AFL Coaches Association award
Top 6 Brownlow finish in: 2013-21 votes, 2015-24 votes, 2016-21 votes
The fact he cant string a sentence together probably limits his coaching abilities somewhatI would think that his achievements meet that easily and are better the vast majority of players.
2010 Rising Star Award
2012 Premiership
Under 22 team 2012, 2013
All-Australian team 3 times, 2013, 2015, 2016
2015 AFL Coaches Association award
Top 6 Brownlow finish in: 2013-21 votes, 2015-24 votes, 2016-21 votes
None of which are coaching credentials.I would think that his achievements meet that easily and are better the vast majority of players.
2010 Rising Star Award
2012 Premiership
Under 22 team 2012, 2013
All-Australian team 3 times, 2013, 2015, 2016
2015 AFL Coaches Association award
Top 6 Brownlow finish in: 2013-21 votes, 2015-24 votes, 2016-21 votes
I would think that his achievements meet that easily and are better the vast majority of players.
2010 Rising Star Award
2012 Premiership
Under 22 team 2012, 2013
All-Australian team 3 times, 2013, 2015, 2016
2015 AFL Coaches Association award
Top 6 Brownlow finish in: 2013-21 votes, 2015-24 votes, 2016-21 votes
Of course playing achievements don't mean you will be a good coach. Just look at Tom Hafey as an example. But if a player hasn't coached before it is a good starting point that at least tells an interested club that they know something about the game.None of which are coaching credentials.
Hannebery was also not a noted leader throughout his time in the AFL, he hasn't suggested any desire to coach or made any career moves which would reflect that desire.
For all his time out of the game through injury he never took on any active coaching role at St Kilda or Sydney - the players who are leaning towards coaching invariably do. Sic spent his year and a half out pretty much running the gamut of player development and coaching roles, even players as young as Rowell used time out of the game to do the same. Hannebery, though a good player for a while, never did anything like that.
Ratten got sacked on the back of their onfield performances, and most people think their list is pretty ordinary. Hard to see where Hannebury had any sort of impact on development of younger players when none stand out.Of course playing achievements don't mean you will be a good coach. Just look at Tom Hafey as an example. But if a player hasn't coached before it is a good starting point that at least tells an interested club that they know something about the game.
Your views don't agree with those of Brett Ratten.
Ratten lauded the impact of retiring veteran Dan Hannebery on the young players at the Saints as the injury-plagued 31-year-old confirmed his retirement.
Ratten said the success of Hannebery’s time at St Kilda shouldn’t just be measured in the amount of games he played.
“He didn’t play many games here and people will evaluate it through that and say it wasn’t a success,” the coach said on Thursday.
“But Dan has had a huge success on others off the field, worked closely with some of our younger players and his voice and leadership in meetings.
“He’s had a contribution here, not the way he would have wanted. What we can say he has contributed in different ways. He’s been first class.”
Similar things were said about Howe and Phillips prior to their delisting.Of course playing achievements don't mean you will be a good coach. Just look at Tom Hafey as an example. But if a player hasn't coached before it is a good starting point that at least tells an interested club that they know something about the game.
Your views don't agree with those of Brett Ratten.
Ratten lauded the impact of retiring veteran Dan Hannebery on the young players at the Saints as the injury-plagued 31-year-old confirmed his retirement.
Ratten said the success of Hannebery’s time at St Kilda shouldn’t just be measured in the amount of games he played.
“He didn’t play many games here and people will evaluate it through that and say it wasn’t a success,” the coach said on Thursday.
“But Dan has had a huge success on others off the field, worked closely with some of our younger players and his voice and leadership in meetings.
“He’s had a contribution here, not the way he would have wanted. What we can say he has contributed in different ways. He’s been first class.”
Sorry SYL but really all you are saying is that you know more about Hannebery at St Kilda than Ratten.Ratten got sacked on the back of their onfield performances, and most people think their list is pretty ordinary. Hard to see where Hannebury had any sort of impact on development of younger players when none stand out.
Where. Give an example.Similar things were said about Howe and Phillips prior to their delisting.
Of course playing achievements don't mean you will be a good coach. Just look at Tom Hafey as an example. But if a player hasn't coached before it is a good starting point that at least tells an interested club that they know something about the game.
Your views don't agree with those of Brett Ratten.
Ratten lauded the impact of retiring veteran Dan Hannebery on the young players at the Saints as the injury-plagued 31-year-old confirmed his retirement.
Ratten said the success of Hannebery’s time at St Kilda shouldn’t just be measured in the amount of games he played.
“He didn’t play many games here and people will evaluate it through that and say it wasn’t a success,” the coach said on Thursday.
“But Dan has had a huge success on others off the field, worked closely with some of our younger players and his voice and leadership in meetings.
“He’s had a contribution here, not the way he would have wanted. What we can say he has contributed in different ways. He’s been first class.”
You are picking a very strange hill to die on.Sorry SYL but really all you are saying is that you know more about Hannebery at St Kilda than Ratten.
Where. Give an example.
No, I’m shooting holes in the argument that Ratten’s word should be taken as gospel, particularly when it’s well known the amount of shit thrown at Saints for Hanmebury’s contract and injury struggles. He was never going to be anything but super positive about Hannebury.Sorry SYL but really all you are saying is that you know more about Hannebery at St Kilda than Ratten.