What would a Dutton Liberal leadership mean for the Liberals and the country?

Remove this Banner Ad

Why would the west worry about nuclear power. They will never get one. Maybe the occasional visiting submsrine
They're getting nuclear waste under AUKUS.

Albanese signed the law a few months ago to allow the storage of nuclear waste in AUKUS bases.

So WA will get the waste, but none of the benefits (Dutton's plan doesn't involve nuclear for WA).
 
They're getting nuclear waste under AUKUS.

Albanese signed the law a few months ago to allow the storage of nuclear waste in AUKUS bases.

So WA will get the waste, but none of the benefits (Dutton's plan doesn't involve nuclear for WA).
It does have a plant in WA, in Collie
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Dutton already risking getting rooftop solar and battery owners offside. Comes up with a doozy.

Many of these people will be voters in his target seats

 
Dutton already risking getting rooftop solar and battery owners offside. Comes up with a doozy.

Many of these people will be voters in his target seats


All he will do is send millions off grid when people realise the benefits of V2L …
Less people on the grid = prices ⬆
 
All he will do is send millions off grid when people realise the benefits of V2L …
Less people on the grid = prices ⬆

I mean, prices will be lower for those off grid. And the more people off grid generating their own electricity sustainably is a plus, I would have thought. Just don't think that was an angle Dutton was thinking of when this announcement was crafted.
 
…. And why should people have to pay for an expensive grid when they are not connected to it? Via taxes???

How any LNP voter can support Dutton and his nuclear BS, when they are the supposedly protectors of the free market and less taxes !!!! Why do conservatives change their beliefs to suit themselves??
The LNP is truly the party of self interest.
 
And the more people off grid generating their own electricity sustainably is a plus
Excellent response from someone who is a supporter of the Party of self interest.
The security of the power grid is at stake. We have 4 million people with rooftop solar and it is important to keep them on the grid, to help pay for the grid.
Do you think it’s a good idea to make the grid so useless that no one wants to be on it?
 
Peter Dutton verbatim quote:

"So think about it this way, if you’ve got solar panels on your house at home, and you’re charging up your car during the day, you can’t store energy into your battery."

“You can’t, you can’t add the energy at the same time to your car, into your battery at home. And so this is why their system is being over built so dramatically, and this is a cost that’s already been passed on to consumers now.”

And here I am thinking Angus Taylor and Dan Tehan are the most out of their depth members of the Coalition front bench... 😄🤪
 
Speaking in Adelaide shortly after the MYEFO briefing, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton would not be drawn into how a Coalition Budget would be different.
“We’ll make announcements in relation to our programs closer to the election. It’ll be dependent on the economic circumstances,” Mr Dutton said.
“There’s some spending which is necessary, but there’s a lot of spending which the Government has created, which is what has driven inflation.
“Labor always taxes and spends, and then when they run out of money they tax more and when they continue to spend, they drive up inflation and that’s part of the problem.”
In contrast, Dr Chalmers said during a cost-of-living crisis, citizens deserved to rely on government support.
“I think the Australian people have a right to expect a decent level of services, whether it’s aged care, Medicare, early childhood education, the care economy, more broadly,” he said.
“This is beginning to become an increasingly important part of our economy as our population ages in particular. That’s just the reality of the way that our country and how the demographics of our country is changing.”

Didn’t inflation rise most under a coalition govt? Were they ‘taxing and spending?, hell yes
0A293406-EB11-43B2-A52C-A60B5C824E63.jpeg
 
I mean, prices will be lower for those off grid. And the more people off grid generating their own electricity sustainably is a plus, I would have thought. Just don't think that was an angle Dutton was thinking of when this announcement was crafted.
Given the announcement was crafted by the coal and gas lobbies Dutton never has to think at all does he
 
“Labor always taxes and spends, and then when they run out of money they tax more and when they continue to spend, they drive up inflation and that’s part of the problem.”
They have delivered two budget surpluses you moron bellend (referring to Dutton). The way the media run around repeating this idiots endless bullshit is infuriating.

lol - we don't hear much about this subject anymore

1734484313228.png
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

All he will do is send millions off grid when people realise the benefits of V2L …
Less people on the grid = prices ⬆
Not if he makes tax payers pay for nuclear rather then grid power consumers. He can pass on all the costs of nuclear to tax payers if nuclear is govt owned. Why would you go off grid if you implicitly have to pay for the grid through higher taxes anyway.
 
Speaking in Adelaide shortly after the MYEFO briefing, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton would not be drawn into how a Coalition Budget would be different.
“We’ll make announcements in relation to our programs closer to the election. It’ll be dependent on the economic circumstances,” Mr Dutton said.
“There’s some spending which is necessary, but there’s a lot of spending which the Government has created, which is what has driven inflation.
“Labor always taxes and spends, and then when they run out of money they tax more and when they continue to spend, they drive up inflation and that’s part of the problem.”
In contrast, Dr Chalmers said during a cost-of-living crisis, citizens deserved to rely on government support.
“I think the Australian people have a right to expect a decent level of services, whether it’s aged care, Medicare, early childhood education, the care economy, more broadly,” he said.
“This is beginning to become an increasingly important part of our economy as our population ages in particular. That’s just the reality of the way that our country and how the demographics of our country is changing.”

Didn’t inflation rise most under a coalition govt? Were they ‘taxing and spending?, hell yes
View attachment 2189636

Harvey Norman likes this
 
Not if he makes tax payers pay for nuclear rather then grid power consumers. He can pass on all the costs of nuclear to tax payers if nuclear is govt owned. Why would you go off grid if you implicitly have to pay for the grid through higher taxes anyway.
People planning on retiring
 
This nuclear energy thingy is going down a treat for Dutton isn't it?


Well yes. It's a complete joke.

"They are barely pretending these days, or perhaps it is truer to say they are pretending even harder."

Michael West Media again:

 
Dutton: "We didn't do the modelling it's not a Liberal Party document."

Backtracking?
Yep. As outlined in my post the day his coatings came out, it’s true that they were based on an independent document produced by an economics consultancy that is not aligned with the Coalition. But it was the Coalition and specifically Dutton who cherry picked that document to write their policy.

Dutton is 100% responsible for what he released and in the form it was released as part of HIS centre piece energy policy.

And specifically the assumptions underpinning it.

No amount of duck shoving now it’s been widely condemned can change that.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What would a Dutton Liberal leadership mean for the Liberals and the country?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top