I always put 1972 GF into this category. Carlton and Richmond finished 1-2 on the ladder, 3 games clear of 3rd. Richmond beat Carlton twice in H&A. Drew the second semi, and Richmond comfortable won the replay. Carlton completely changed their ganme style for the GF - and it came off off. Percy Jones full-time first ruck (which he hadn't played all year), Nicholls permanent forward (kicked 6 - previous best for the year was 3). Add that to their amazing accuracy on the day (28.9).
It's one of those - 'play the game 10 times and Richmond win it 8 times'. Not this one.
John Nicholls admitted that the blues would have lost the grand final if they didn’t implement those game plan changes and positional moves (they made 8 moves).
If the blues won the second semi draw they may not have made those changes for the grand final and kept the players in the same positions as that helped the blues finish on top of the ladder.
Tom Hafey mentioned in a documentary that the tigers were critical of their defence during the year because it lacked versatility and they played players in the backline who were not really defenders. He was probably referring to players such as Dick Clay and Ray Boyanich.
During the season the tigers conceded 24 goals against the Saints at Moorabbin and 25 against the Cats at the MCG. Nicholls may have reflected on those games when planning for the grand final and instructed the team to play an attacking game.
The subsequent emergence of Merv Keane and the recruitment of players such as Robert McGhie and Gareth Andrews helped balance the tiger side better over the next couple of years.
Last edited: