Fyfe is a fair player, so if he is up there with Dusty that is fair enough. Best players are judged on what their best is not what their most consistent is. Judd for example was for a short time at WC was right up there with the greats, finished his career a champion but not as dominant later in the back half of his career. GAJ had a similar output and consistency all his career and is rightly held at the highest level. Martin does things the other don't, which makes him a bit unique, which makes him the best, not the most consistent. Many of great players don't win Brownlow's which is a similar principle.Dusty is the best big game player without doubt, but he's not the undisputed best player/midfielder in the league.
9 out of 20 games last year, he had <=20 disposals and <=1 goal. At his best, he's possibly the most damaging player I've ever seen, but he goes missing way too often to be considered outright, unmatched number 1. For me, it's gotta be Fyfe, but it's highly debatable. It's rude to bag others out for having differing opinions in something so subjective