- Sep 25, 2013
- 16,122
- 31,139
You have a funny way of saying that, maybe be a bit more specific.
Yeah I admit that was a bit of a stretch, I beleive Simpson would be and McLean would be best 22.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You have a funny way of saying that, maybe be a bit more specific.
Didn't Jamison concede the least goals of any full back last year? He doesn't provide the rebound some other full backs do, but their primary goal is to shut down their opponent & Jamison is damn good at that.No it's not. Not one of those players would be regarded as elite in their position. Henderson could be the exception but that's only if you classify utility as a position (I personally do not)
You're kidding - McLean would slot in but not Simpson! Simpson is Carlton's reigning B&F winner and you're saying he wouldn't even get a game with North, a team we finished above last year? You're joking, surely. Simpson is a great player - super-consistent over the years and just gets the job done week in and week out with no fuss; super courageous and he was #1 for disposals and #2 for marks at Carlton last year!
You're kidding - McLean would slot in but not Simpson! Simpson is Carlton's reigning B&F winner and you're saying he wouldn't even get a game with North, a team we finished above last year? You're joking, surely. Simpson is a great player - super-consistent over the years and just gets the job done week in and week out with no fuss; super courageous and he was #1 for disposals and #2 for marks at Carlton last year!
Didn't Jamison concede the least goals of any full back last year? He doesn't provide the rebound some other full backs do, but their primary goal is to shut down their opponent & Jamison is damn good at that.
Haha, I actually meant to write Simpson. Bit of a brainfart on my behalf.
To clarify, I don't think McLean would easily get a game at North.
I never said the rest were elite, it's a very good spine, not an elite spine.
I disagree.
How can Kreuzer been overrated if everyone thinks he's shit, personally I think he's underrated. Just because he's a number 1 pick doesn't mean he'll be the best player in the draft. He's a ruckman every team would happily take, except maybe West Coast.
I said we could easily make the 4 when playing our best football, I also said our worst football is terrible and I hope Mick can stop these patches from happening. I don't think we will make the 4 , I think we'll finish 6th or 7th. Improvement to come from Menzel, Yarran, Graham, Docherty, Thomas, Kreuzer (although I think he's doing perfectly fine) + Carrazzo and Murphy playing a full season, along with Gibbs FINALLY moving to the midfield.
But that doesn't make him elite which is the context in which we were talking (doubt many Pies players called Presto elite). No one said Jameson is a crap player.Prestigiacomo agrees therefore I'm sure Collingwood supporters would agree! [Jamison is good at stopping and provides more rebound that the average FB]
You didn't say elite, you said elite in their positionBut that doesn't make him elite which is the context in which we were talking (doubt many Pies players called Presto elite). No one said Jameson is a crap player.
He isn't elite in his position imo. Sorry it wasn't any clearer.You didn't say elite, you said elite in their position
He isn't elite in his position imo. Sorry it wasn't any clearer.
Kreuzer has to be the most overrated ruckman in the competition - I can think of at least 10 specialist rucks in the AFL who are more effective. Saying he is very good is laughable. He is an honest footballer who hasn't lived up to the expectations of where he was drafted and likely won't - he's not big enough to compete with the comps best specialist rucks and not mobile enough or strong enough in the air to do the job as a kpf. Drafting him at no. 1 was a mistake that shouldn't have been made - everybody knows that young rucks are a bit of a lottery and you'd think a professional clubs would be wary of such mistakes made in the past (i.e. Josh Fraser was a very similar player to Kreuzer and was capped from becoming a top AFL ruck for the very same reasons that Kreuzer is now battling with).
I also find your comments that Carlton will go close to finishing top 4 very puzzling. I can't see how an untalented aged list that couldn't finish in the 8 in 2013 is going to match the improvement of clubs who have better managed their list structure. Where is the improvement coming from at the Blues because in terms of younger players they are nowhere near as strong as Geelong, Collingwood, Port, Richmond, Essendon, Norf, Gold Coast - the teams they will be competing with to make the 8 let alone the 4.
He was voted in the top 5 key defenders on the polls board.He isn't elite in his position imo. Sorry it wasn't any clearer.
Here's a list of full backs who I regard as good as or better than Jameson.Can you name your own list of elite full backs?
Actually at the time of posting this he is voted 6th best (get facts right next time please)He was voted in the top 5 key defenders on the polls board.
Your opinion on anything regarding Carlton is usually pretty sad tbh
Actually at the time of posting this he is voted 6th best (get facts right next time please)
Also lol at quoting that thread as if it's some kind of authority when (a) it is a bigfooty poll thread and (b) it was started in June.
I'm sorry but there is nothing wrong with saying that Jameson isn't elite for his position. It seems to me that when it comes to Carlton supporters on this board there is always a presumption in favour of their players being considered elite. It should be the other way round, especially when looking at a club that couldn't finish in the top 8
haha so you found the poll & voted for mackenzie to get him past jamison. Well playedActually at the time of posting this he is voted 6th best (get facts right next time please)
I quoted it because it's impartial. Next time I'll just say 'IMO' and proceed to throw a tantrum, if that's what you consider a higher authority.Also lol at quoting that thread as if it's some kind of authority when (a) it is a bigfooty poll thread and (b) it was started in June.
What a horribly dumb troll, Carlton finished higher than CollingwoodI'm sorry but there is nothing wrong with saying that Jameson isn't elite for his position. It seems to me that when it comes to Carlton supporters on this board there is always a presumption in favour of their players being considered elite. It should be the other way round, especially when looking at a club that couldn't finish in the top 8
Why would McLean or Simpson have to replace Goldstein, Thompson, Thomas or Petrie?
I mean push out of the top 10 players
i.e. Josh Fraser was a very similar player to Kreuzer ...
No it's not. Not one of those players would be regarded as elite in their position. Henderson could be the exception but that's only if you classify utility as a position (I personally do not)
Darrou Elton Stephenson Griffiths McBean, That's a very good spine, providing they all stand up...and a few injurys of course.
In reality however, you're more likely to see them in the 2s.
Shame how reality gets in the way sometimes.
I also think they are an injury away from a non finals season. If Cloke went down they would be stuffed.
Brown ain't much down back and Keefe is average at best (at this stage anyway). That leaves much on the shoulders of Reid.