Who's afraid of Rupert Murdoch? The end of an era.

Remove this Banner Ad

The era has ended, just most haven't accepted it. The days of the ink media making the political parties nervous are well gone and have been gone since before Howard lost power. John Howard worked this out which is why he used talkback radio so much. Talkback radio has a bigger impact on political parties than the ink media.

Not yet. They still have the ability to shape a debate. Certainly News Limited had a big affect on how the debate was shaped in the 2013 election.
 
Not yet. They still have the ability to shape a debate. Certainly News Limited had a big affect on how the debate was shaped in the 2013 election.
Had absolutely no impact in Victoria during the state election. Ran a strong anti-small party campaign - failed as now 5 in Upper House (1 Sex Party, 2 Shooters, 1 DLP & 1 Vote Local jobs), heavily anti-green - fail as Greens won two lower house taking one from each party.

It has been noticable though how quickly they've dumped the Libs though and happy to pay out on Napthine over East-West once the costings were released and showed it would've been the biggest white elephant in the history of Victoria
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Rinehart has done her dough on that one big time.

Like every other business decision she has made, aside from having Rio Tinto run hope downs for her.
has she tho?

did not she just throw her chips on the table to announce that I am a Player, and i will be a player.

So every cent she spends on corporate communications, is that much more potent, not becaue of Fairfax, not because of Alan Jones and Ray HAdley, it is just because she has delivered herself onto the scene and will demand influence.

It is like the Chinese fight over Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands. It really aint about sea resources and potential gas/oil deposits under the ocean. It is a proxy fight for influence and dominance in the Pacific. It aint about Atols.

Gina did not want fairfax. She could have split it with Singleton. That WOULD have cost her coin, and been money down the drain.

She will gladly assume control of the Aus when they breakup News Unlimited if Rupe is off, or the Kuwaiti sheik switches his voting stake.

MaddAdam for his thoughts

#Kstreet
#Burson_Marsteller
#Bernays
Smiling Buddha
 
Fairfax has become unreadable. Which doesn't matter, because no one reads it anymore. It's a pity because it used to be a great paper.

Now it's like the socialist alternative from uni days. A progressive circle j**k so bigoted and inwardly focused that it's become detached from reality.

Instead of being the Left's answer to the Australian, it's actually its answer to the Herald Sun.

I mean please.... "TONY ABBOTT SHOULD HAVE DEMOTED HIMSELF" is their main headline!

http://www.theage.com.au/business/tony-abbott-should-have-demoted-himself-20141222-12c74q.html

This article took about 15 minutes to write and involved no research whatsoever. The reader learns nothing other than that Adele Ferguson clearly can't stand Tony Abbott. That wouldn't pass for a year 9 argumentative essay, much less the work of a professional journalist.

You used to be a respected publication. What happened?
 
Last edited:
The ABC has 100 times the bias of Murdoch, who employs many notable left wing columnists (unlike our national broadcaster).
Name the "many notable left wing columnists" the Dirty Digger employs? Apart from Phillip Adams.

If you had the most rudimentary understanding of the checks and balances at the ABC you'd realise how dumb your comment is.

Also, if you'd taken the time to even generally acquaint yourself with the Murdoch organisations appalling behaviour in the UK phone hacking disgrace and Murdoch's dissembling over it you'd have a rough idea of a man who has no real appreciation of the meaning of ethics or integrity.

Not to mention how his organisation willfully distorts the news on a daily basis. Or how he screwed mum and dad shareholders by changing the voting rights when it looked like his family would lose control of his empire.

There's plenty more.
 
The ABC has 100 times the bias of Murdoch, who employs many notable left wing columnists (unlike our national broadcaster).
Chortle, chortle....
 
If you had the most rudimentary understanding of the checks and balances at the ABC you'd realise how dumb your comment is.

Perhaps you'd like to detail some of these check and balances given you only require a rudimentary understanding. Anyone who seriously thinks the ABC isn't left winged biased is either stupid (which I doubt you are) or just needs to change the channel from time to time. And not just to SBS.

Was it these same checks and balances that prevented the ABC from mentioning Monis was a muslim?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-...onis-named-as-man-behind-sydney-siege/5969246

Talk about distorting the news! I now know the names of the Australian soldiers whose families he wrote letters to, but I'm not allowed to hear he is a muslim. The only reference to the fact he was a muslim was a side reference in a quote from the PM (that bastard!). Clearly the Australian public aren't bright or mature enough to hear that this was Islamic terrorism (which it was) without assaulting any random person in religious attire walking down the street.

THANK GOD I'VE GOT THE ABC AND THE GOOD PEOPLE AT "#I'LLRIDEWITHYOU" TO SAVE ME FROM MYSELF!

To think I pay taxes to fund that sort of bull***t. One of his two demands was an ISIS flag FFS!
 
Perhaps you'd like to detail some of these check and balances given you only require a rudimentary understanding. Anyone who seriously thinks the ABC isn't left winged biased is either stupid (which I doubt you are) or just needs to change the channel from time to time. And not just to SBS.

Was it these same checks and balances that prevented the ABC from mentioning Monis was a muslim?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-...onis-named-as-man-behind-sydney-siege/5969246

Talk about distorting the news! I now know the names of the Australian soldiers whose families he wrote letters to, but I'm not allowed to hear he is a muslim. The only reference to the fact he was a muslim was a side reference in a quote from the PM (that bastard!). Clearly the Australian public aren't bright or mature enough to hear that this was Islamic terrorism (which it was) without assaulting any random person in religious attire walking down the street.

THANK GOD I'VE GOT THE ABC AND THE GOOD PEOPLE AT "#I'LLRIDEWITHYOU" TO SAVE ME FROM MYSELF!

To think I pay taxes to fund that sort of bull***t. One of his two demands was an ISIS flag FFS!

Hi George.
 
Funny title, but in all seriousness that is what he wants, I knew someone back in the 80's who worked in the Advertiser building and she said when he walked past you had to not look at him or... out the door.
What he wants is everyone to be employed (preferably by him) so he has all the power and money.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Fairfax has become unreadable. Which doesn't matter, because no one reads it anymore. It's a pity because it used to be a great paper.

Now it's like the socialist alternative from uni days. A progressive circle j**k so bigoted and inwardly focused that it's become detached from reality.

Instead of being the Left's answer to the Australian, it's actually its answer to the Herald Sun.

I mean please.... "TONY ABBOTT SHOULD HAVE DEMOTED HIMSELF" is their main headline!

http://www.theage.com.au/business/tony-abbott-should-have-demoted-himself-20141222-12c74q.html

This article took about 15 minutes to write and involved no research whatsoever. The reader learns nothing other than that Adele Ferguson clearly can't stand Tony Abbott. That wouldn't pass for a year 9 argumentative essay, much less the work of a professional journalist.

You used to be a respected publication. What happened?
hey, did not the editorial endorse napthine not daniel dan andrews.

lets put him in a blazer and open necked shirt and chinos and get him on sunrise weekend edition :rolleyes:
 
Perhaps you'd like to detail some of these check and balances given you only require a rudimentary understanding. Anyone who seriously thinks the ABC isn't left winged biased is either stupid (which I doubt you are) or just needs to change the channel from time to time. And not just to SBS.

Was it these same checks and balances that prevented the ABC from mentioning Monis was a muslim?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-...onis-named-as-man-behind-sydney-siege/5969246

Talk about distorting the news! I now know the names of the Australian soldiers whose families he wrote letters to, but I'm not allowed to hear he is a muslim. The only reference to the fact he was a muslim was a side reference in a quote from the PM (that bastard!). Clearly the Australian public aren't bright or mature enough to hear that this was Islamic terrorism (which it was) without assaulting any random person in religious attire walking down the street.

THANK GOD I'VE GOT THE ABC AND THE GOOD PEOPLE AT "#I'LLRIDEWITHYOU" TO SAVE ME FROM MYSELF!

To think I pay taxes to fund that sort of bull***t. One of his two demands was an ISIS flag FFS!
There was a link in the middle of the article to this: http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2009-11-09/radical-muslim-cleric-goes-unchecked/1135594

Radical Muslim cleric!
 
Perhaps you'd like to detail some of these check and balances given you only require a rudimentary understanding. Anyone who seriously thinks the ABC isn't left winged biased is either stupid (which I doubt you are) or just needs to change the channel from time to time. And not just to SBS.

Was it these same checks and balances that prevented the ABC from mentioning Monis was a muslim?

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-12-...onis-named-as-man-behind-sydney-siege/5969246

Talk about distorting the news! I now know the names of the Australian soldiers whose families he wrote letters to, but I'm not allowed to hear he is a muslim. The only reference to the fact he was a muslim was a side reference in a quote from the PM (that bastard!). Clearly the Australian public aren't bright or mature enough to hear that this was Islamic terrorism (which it was) without assaulting any random person in religious attire walking down the street.

THANK GOD I'VE GOT THE ABC AND THE GOOD PEOPLE AT "#I'LLRIDEWITHYOU" TO SAVE ME FROM MYSELF!

To think I pay taxes to fund that sort of bull***t. One of his two demands was an ISIS flag FFS!

Firstly, I noticed the person who claimed the Dirty Digger had many lefties writing opinion pieces in his rags couldn't come up with the "many" when challenged. Not even one and I gave him a start.

Well done you for picking one piece that you claim is biased. If I took the trouble to regularly read the Dirty Diggers publications I'd not only be confronted with tripe directed at the mentality of 13 year olds on a daily basis but (to quote a Supreme Court judge) "errors of fact, distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language" Or to put it in language you'd be more familiar with utter bullshit.

The ABC has a Fact Check Group which publicly exposes any errors.

There is also a group tasked with ensuring the rigorous editorial standards are adhered to.

The editorial policies of the ABC aren't hard to find. They run into 24 pages.

Don't look for anything like articulated 'standards' in the Dirty Diggers publications because there are none.

The ABC standards are so rigorously applied around election time producers have to count the minutes each political party gets to ensure equity.

The ABC has many right wing voices putting their views. Roskam, Wilson, Switzer, Albrechsen, Devine, Sloan, Henderson, Savva, Akerman are a few who are regularly on radio and/ or television

Then there's the nonsense about the journos being predominantly lefties when a survey recounted on 774 this year illustrated more ABC journos had moved to the reactionary side of politics than the progressive side. Sarah Henderson being one in the current Federal Parliament.

I'm sure your myopic views won't change though. So enjoy feeding your warped sense of reality by continuing to digest the utter garbage thickheads like Andrew Bolt, Piers Wackerman, Alan Jones, Ray Hadley et al trot out on a daily basis.

I prefer the moderate, balanced informed views of our national broadcaster.

Each to his/her own I guess.
 
His latest tweet has hit the nail on the head though! Can't understand the controversy.

"Maybe most Moslems peaceful, but until they recognize and destroy their growing jihadist cancer they must be held responsible."
 
His latest tweet has hit the nail on the head though! Can't understand the controversy.

"Maybe most Moslems peaceful, but until they recognize and destroy their growing jihadist cancer they must be held responsible."
"Maybe most Westerners are peaceful, but until they recognise and destroy their growing fascist cancer they must be held responsible."
 
"Maybe most Westerners are peaceful, but until they recognise and destroy their growing fascist cancer they must be held responsible."

Dumb post. What Murdoch is saying is that the extremist issue can only be handled within the Muslim community. External parties trying to beat Islamic extremisn just causes more resistance. For real change to occur it must be driven from within. Understand?
 
Dumb post. What Murdoch is saying is that the extremist issue can only be handled within the Muslim community. External parties trying to beat Islamic extremisn just causes more resistance. For real change to occur it must be driven from within. Understand?
I don't. Read like a massive generalisation to me.
 
I don't think I can make it any simpler for you, sorry.

Dumb post. What Murdoch is saying is that the extremist issue can only be handled within the Muslim community. External parties trying to beat Islamic extremisn just causes more resistance. For real change to occur it must be driven from within. Understand?

what isf the west bombed them somewhat less often ?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Who's afraid of Rupert Murdoch? The end of an era.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top