Problem is it's high contact and medium impact; nothing will change those 2 criteria, especially since Webster went off with the blood rule. As soon as an act is high and above low impact, there's no chance of escaping at least a 1-week suspension unless you contest the legitimacy of the act.
So we'd have to make a case to change the classification from 'careless play' to 'in the contest; acceptable'. Baffled that so-called experts at the MRP have a completely different opinion of this act to multiple umpires on spot during the game who saw it as part of the contest. I'd be interested to know exactly how much time was between the mark and the contact, and the angle at which Yeo's arm made contact with Webster - both players had eyes and trajectories for the ball.
Essentially, to be fair, this is bullshit
So we'd have to make a case to change the classification from 'careless play' to 'in the contest; acceptable'. Baffled that so-called experts at the MRP have a completely different opinion of this act to multiple umpires on spot during the game who saw it as part of the contest. I'd be interested to know exactly how much time was between the mark and the contact, and the angle at which Yeo's arm made contact with Webster - both players had eyes and trajectories for the ball.
Essentially, to be fair, this is bullshit