Bill Brownless said this arvo that Zak collapsed at training today. He's "ok, but is having tests"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Neither can I, not a thing.Yeah, jee, I hope he's wrong. I can't find anything about it on the 'net
Except nobody would be interested in Mcviegh, as it's gotta be his last season you'd think, and Tippett is 3/4 done as well. Who would bother taking Sinclair??
His manager doing his job. Gotta see what others are offering once dusty and kelly decide.From the Reid offer article about Zak....
"Sydney’s other priority signing is speedy defender/midfielder Zak Jones, who has drawn significant interest from Victorian clubs, including Essendon and North Melbourne. Sydney already has an offer on the table to Jones and is confident of retaining him."
So what's the bloody hold up
Thanks for that, I thought I was going a bit loopy!2 strikes and 1 week's suspensin.
Round 2:
Zak Jones, Sydney Swans, has been charged with engaging in rough conduct against Travis Cloke, Western Bulldogs, during the first quarter of the Round Two match between the Sydney Swans and the Western Bulldogs, played at Etihad Stadium on Friday March 31, 2017. In summary, he can accept a $1000 sanction with an early plea.
Round 10:
Zak Jones, Sydney Swans, has been charged with striking Luke Breust, Hawthorn, during the third quarter of the Round 10 match between the Sydney Swans and Hawthorn, played at the SCG on Friday May 26, 2017. In summary, for a second classifiable offence, he can accept a $1500 sanction with an early plea.
Round 13:
Zak Jones, Sydney Swans, has been charged with striking Dan Butler, Richmond, during the third quarter of the Round 13 match between the Sydney Swans and Richmond, played at the MCG on Saturday June 17, 2017. In summary, he can accept a one-match sanction with an early plea.
Round 15:
Contact between the Sydney Swans’ Zak Jones and Melbourne’s Mitch Hannan from the fourth quarter of Friday’s match was assessed. The ball was loose with both players coming to the contest. Jones runs through the line of the ball and seeks to hit or tap the ball with his right hand to his advantage, making contact with the ball. At the same moment, he braces for contact with Hannan and high contact is made to the Melbourne player. It was the view of the panel that Jones was contesting the ball and no further action was taken.
Rohan ? Yet you rate Jones higher than Rohan for power, disposal and pace ? FFS man, get a grip (oh, it appears you have)Players I would trade or move on to keep jones : Lloyd, Robinson, McVeigh, Rohan, Reid, Sinclair, tippet, Naismith. Some of these players I really rate but I rate jones higher for his power, disposal and pace.
Yes, and we should pay only what WE think he's worth. It's not the Swan's way to be let other clubs dictate terms.A few clubs with a lot of $ in need of players like Zac.
I don't blame a player going for $. It is what it is.
If you don't have basic comprehension skills there is no point conversing with you.Rohan ? Yet you rate Jones higher than Rohan for power, disposal and pace ? FFS man, get a grip (oh, it appears you have)
I comprehended the same as bungee but it's your entitled opinion!If you don't have basic comprehension skills there is no point conversing with you.
Nowhere did I say jones has those attributes to a greater extent than Rohan. I was just listing players I would be content to lose for Rohan.I comprehended the same as bungee but it's your entitled opinion!
Look laddy, you're entitled to your opinion but you can't expect folks to agree with you when you're spouting nonsense from your posterior. Time to let go. Vous comprenez ?If you don't have basic comprehension skills there is no point conversing with you.
Now I am confused. Are these players you woud lose for Jones or Rohan ? Or are you saying we should lose Rohan so we have more money to pay Rohan ? How is Rohan faster than Rohan ? Or do you just think he's faster than you think he is so we should pay Rohan more ? Do we keep Jones or is this about Rohan ?Nowhere did I say jones has those attributes to a greater extent than Rohan. I was just listing players I would be content to lose for Rohan.
Off Rohan his boat!Now I am confused. Are these players you woud lose for Jones or Rohan ? Or are you saying we should lose Rohan so we have more money to pay Rohan ? How is Rohan faster than Rohan ? Or do you just think he's faster than you think he is so we should pay Rohan more ? Do we keep Jones or is this about Rohan ?
A few clubs with a lot of $ in need of players like Zac.
I don't blame a player going for $. It is what it is.