Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
33, 43 and 53 for Grundy looks like a good deal from our end, especially if he is taking a paycut of some description.
33, 43 and 53 for Grundy looks like a good deal from our end, especially if he is taking a paycut of some description.
Lamb says we wouldn’t have even used the 43. Which makes it a no brainer, we’ve effectively swapped 33 for 27.
Is the draft really that shallow? Jesus Christ
I guess if it’s true it’s indicating that we want to take the picks for Jackson to the draft and only use 3.
Whatever pick we get for Bedford will be our last selection.
There's always a chance we split our first rounders we get from Jackson into 6 separate picks so we can splurge on those juicy 18 year old KPFsAlso, so long 6 KPF dream. What a terrible day.
yeah i've heard this year could be the smallest amount of kids ever taken in the draft. might also explain why so many meh players are changing clubs this year.Is the draft really that shallow? Jesus Christ
6 kpf over 2 years. Nonetheless, we can kiss 2023 goodbye. No forward line. Thanks GoodyAlso, so long 6 KPF dream. What a terrible day.
6 kpf over 2 years. Nonetheless, we can kiss 2023 goodbye. No forward line. Thanks Goody
What's the limit on pre-season supplement signings? Could nab another 2 or 3 there, plus a mid season draftee or two. We'll be overflowing with KPFs by September 2023There's always a chance we split our first rounders we get from Jackson into 6 separate picks so we can splurge on those juicy 18 year old KPFs
Smells like MFC Proper Gander to me. Im struggling to wrap my head around not being able to get a better player than Melksham at 43.
AFL website actually reporting we’re only intending to take 2 picks. I thought minimum was 3 but they’d know.I wouldn’t be surprised if Harmes to Essendon is still in play. Assuming the 27 is for grundy means we need to pick up a couple more early picks to take the required 3 players.
AFL website actually reporting we’re only intending to take 2 picks. I thought minimum was 3 but they’d know.
Not good news for A11dAtP0w3R, why would we trade Bedford for a pick in the 40s if we’re not gonna use it
Absolutely agree with that. Doesn’t make any sense to me to keep Melk and not use pick 43
Well I'm ****ed now anyway if I want to read this thread.If you have danster on ignore youre only hurting yourself. Youre missing some entertaining stuff.
Never made it onto my list. The Altona U9’s was a strong team this year.You’ve delisted A11dAtP0w3R ?!!!
I identify as a turnip thank you.What a cicada CA is
Never mad onto my list. The Altona U9’s was a strong team this year.
I identify as a turnip thank you.
Apparently it’s bad manners to ask something or someone why they identify that way.Why a turnip? Why not a Beetroot? Or Rhubarb and Blueberry.
Apparently it’s bad manners to ask something or someone why they identify that way.
just love me MM.
AFL website actually reporting we’re only intending to take 2 picks. I thought minimum was 3 but they’d know.
Not good news for A11dAtP0w3R, why would we trade Bedford for a pick in the 40s if we’re not gonna use it