-
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
-
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Round SF Winner: And_ROOS
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Mega Thread Non-Freo AFL Discussion 2022 - Part 2
- Thread starter serial_thrilla
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Jul 20, 2014
- 8,194
- 18,416
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
I think they've actually done OK, better than I at least expected
I thought it likely the public would only get a filtered verison, but the panel retains their own rights to the report and so it will be released in full without AFL fingerprints over it. That's got to be a good thing?
gaskin
Hall of Famer
- Aug 19, 2009
- 35,607
- 40,565
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- LFC, Glory, Wests, Seahawks, UGA
Horrid. The back is bad but the front is just completely and utterly ****ed. Whoever thought it was a good idea is a moron.
gaskin
Hall of Famer
- Aug 19, 2009
- 35,607
- 40,565
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- LFC, Glory, Wests, Seahawks, UGA
I am hoping it is just tape over the old sponsorship.
- Apr 22, 2017
- 10,268
- 9,562
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Nationals, Pelicans
Realised too late this is the wrong thread lol.
That post conveniently left out the away jumper which is the worst of all.
It's heat pressed over the old logos so it looks horrible taking up so much room
The boxes should be smaller next year when the real deal comes
The boxes should be smaller next year when the real deal comes
They are people selected by Gill and the AFL.
Like the police investigating the police.
It is the reason that some will not partake in it.
Maybe this is the mob that should be investigating. Sportintegrity.gov.au
- Jul 20, 2014
- 8,194
- 18,416
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
You think the four learned lawyers selected are AFl puppets?
Not suggesting that at all, but they are still selected by the AFL to investigate the AFL.
Not a good look.
The Hawks did the same thing and look at the mess that has happened now.
- Jul 20, 2014
- 8,194
- 18,416
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
It's an independent investigation. I'm not sure what the problem is
Purple Jesus
not jess
Just a couple of fellow captains...
It is not independent, it is a panel selected by the AFL to investigate the AFL.
Last edited:
- Jul 20, 2014
- 8,194
- 18,416
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
So when a government appoints three KC royal commissioners to investigate something, and the royal commission conducts hearings and produces a report, that's not independent because the government appointed them?
This is an identical process
Whatever you reckon.
Taylor
Community Leader
- Moderator
- #1,093
There is certainly an opportunity not to choose the particular wig that has an axe to grind over the issue with the government.
I'll take this opportunity to mention that when the AFL Tribunal met to rule on the Essendon saga they conceded that a substance was ordered, paid for, shipped to and a substances was administered by Essendon to the players but because the chain of custody couldn't be confirmed the entire length of that trip during shipping, that the substance that arrived wasn't tested and confirmed to be the one ordered - the AFL couldn't take further action.
This is after the AFL happened to call Essendon officials who happened to be having a meeting together at one of their homes, the day before the raids were going to take place - to talk about nothing related I'm sure.
I think AFL Integrity Unit is an oxymoron and they have a long way to go to regain any of it.
Imagine if we'd picked up Hodge, Mitchell, King etc etc etc....
So faced with a very serious set of allegations what should an organisation do? Ignore the allegations? Refuse to investigate? An even worse look.
The AFL have to investigate. They can't handball that responsibility to someone else.
Of course other bodies (worksafe, discrimination authorities, legislatures, etc) might decide to have their own investigations. That is their right. But it doesn't absolve the AFL from having a responsibility to look into the affairs of one of its clubs.
Does anyone remember that St Kilda nuffie who posted on here hating on Freo ever since Ross Lyon left St Kilda? He always claimed that he didn't like Ross and would troll Ross's short comings vociferously.
It seemed that his dislike for Freo coincided with Ross leaving. Anyway now that Ross is back I was wondering if he has been devolving lately
It seemed that his dislike for Freo coincided with Ross leaving. Anyway now that Ross is back I was wondering if he has been devolving lately
- Mar 2, 2007
- 43,249
- 62,093
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Cowboys, Packers, Scorchers
Defacto or Plugger?
I haven't seen the former post yet on the MB, but Plugger has instantly done the full 180 and is praising everything about RTB again. Very amusing.
Probably Plugger. Jeez he was so offended. Endlessly calling his ex gf a bitch only to welcome her back with open arms.
Final ‘hurdle’ removed in Saints’ pursuit of Lyon
Ross Lyon met with senior St Kilda officials on Sunday, easing the last contractual hurdle and paving the way for him to return and enjoy a second stint as coach of the club. A club great and elite performance manager are also in the frame to return.
L
Final ‘hurdle’ removed in Saints’ pursuit of Lyon
Ross Lyon met with senior St Kilda officials on Sunday, easing the last contractual hurdle and paving the way for him to return and enjoy a second stint as coach of the club. A club great and elite performance manager are also in the frame to return.www.theage.com.au
- Status
Similar threads
