- Mar 27, 2006
- 2,764
- 2,658
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Gags is a very good operator, will be an AFL club CEO in the not too distant future.Any credit for landing Sanders goes to this man btw
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gags is a very good operator, will be an AFL club CEO in the not too distant future.Any credit for landing Sanders goes to this man btw
We want to hold onto him for as long as we canGags is a very good operator, will be an AFL club CEO in the not too distant future.
One thing they don't have is 2 pick positions before pick 4 though.Apparently Melb are super keen on Pick 4 also. And they have a better points hand than we do. Ie Pick 5 (6) & Pick 13 (14)
Re Gallagher, would you say, maybe, he's going to be the one who saves us?Any credit for landing Sanders goes to this man btw
Not bad.Re Gallagher, would you say, maybe, he's going to be the one who saves us?
It's funny that every Wet Toast fan that comes in here is shocked, almost offended, by the 'fake news' rumour that Reid doesn't want to go to there. "He and his management have publicly said he's happy to go there... blah blah blah".
Then this bloke comes in here and then actually believes the Sanders made the call that he doesn't want to play for North (yeah... even after he made the application for our NGA)
.... jog on.
Wasn't there something reported a couple of weeks back that they were thinking of allowing clubs to match bids inside 40 again on NGAs in the not too distant future.
So now Sanders is approved as our NGA, taking out all assistance, allowances, special treatment etc, if we don't end up with him, it will because he was in the draft in the couple of that the AFL changed the rules before changing them back?
Bulldogs play finals in 2020 and in the same year take the clear cut number one pick, because he happened to be in their NGA zone.
The team that has been on the bottom of the ladder for four straight years has an eligible NGA player, but there isn't the slightest opportunity for wiggle room on a rule they may well cancel next year anyway? Why, because it may upset Geelong that they might not get access to the best players in the draft after missing the finals for one year in a row?
But of course no one is saying a word about the three academy players being happily handed to the Suns... as well as bending the rules for them a couple of years ago to allow them to prelist academy players (and also expanding their academy zone!)
Does this help us?
Imagine pick 11, access to sanders and some late picks to trade... and the media got it completely wrong and AFL have been working to help us significantly
Yeh one can dream though
It was probably a trick question.So the AFL asked us to get creative.
Is it possible? Surely if somebody can sign him up to ancestory.com the DNA test might turn up a few eligible candidates.Dream of Wayne Carey coming out with his 20 illegitimate boys who are turning 18 next year and are as good as he was.