not really, we aint getting that pick back.If the rumour about him still having issues with his concussion are true we might have to put him on the LTI list and upgrade another player..This could end up a win win situation...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
not really, we aint getting that pick back.If the rumour about him still having issues with his concussion are true we might have to put him on the LTI list and upgrade another player..This could end up a win win situation...
So the guy that turned *** and pick 1 last year into Harry Sheezel and George Wardlaw is an idiot?Just hope that this idiot dont trade our pick 2 and possibly pick 3 for pick 1.
You are not a good Poker player. We got all the trump card lfrom last year. Pick 1 and JHF and we ended up with pick 2,3 + pick 16. Could be better. We should hold on to pick 1 last year and let Port do the negotiating for JHF in return for pick 2 + future first round pick or something. They are desperate to get him so we should let them sweat. All I'm saying is the deal could be better.So the guy that turned *** and pick 1 last year into Harry Sheezel and George Wardlaw is an idiot?
Maybe consider changing your user name to Wile E Coyote.
Your talking Rawlings hereJust hope that this idiot dont trade our pick 2 and possibly pick 3 for pick 1.
We would've got Sheezel regardless.So the guy that turned *** and pick 1 last year into Harry Sheezel and George Wardlaw is an idiot?
Maybe consider changing your user name to Wile E Coyote.
And you’ll never forget it. :stern lookWe would've got Sheezel regardless.
Wardlaw & Ports fist pick is what we got for JHF. Geez.
Which bit of '*** and pick 1 last year into Harry Sheezel and George Wardlaw' didn't you understand? Geez.We would've got Sheezel regardless.
Wardlaw & Ports fist pick is what we got for JHF. Geez.
Spot on. We simply didn’t maximise our return for trading JHF to Port. :stern lookYou are not a good Poker player. We got all the trump card lfrom last year. Pick 1 and JHF and we ended up with pick 2,3 + pick 16. Could be better. We should hold on to pick 1 last year and let Port do the negotiating for JHF in return for pick 2 + future first round pick or something. They are desperate to get him so we should let them sweat. All I'm saying is the deal could be better.
Yes some nut suggested we should have paid him a mil per season x 5 years.For all those who insisted that the best way to manage this situation was to put an offer in front of Ben McKay months ago, here endeth the lesson.
All we did was not overpay an average player tbhPotentially big loss but well executed return from Brady & Co. Fairly obvious we left the shop window open once we detected a hint of disinterest from Benjamin.
All we did was not overpay an average player tbh
They've already been at three between them. The each move one more time that'll be five.Yes some nut suggested we should have paid him a mil per season x 5 years.
Someone else suggested we should have bought over the other Magoo so we could keep Ben happy. Imagine a world where we had two Magoo and they cost us near 2 mil per season.
I suggest by the time the Magoo are both retired they’ll have been at five clubs between them.
Yes I was being conservative. Harry would at North if we offered 3. I can see Ben being a 3 club player and Harold at least a 2.They've already been at three between them. The each move one more time that'll be five.
This is about where I am on it. On the one hand, getting rid of Buckets allows the coaches to tinker a bit with the defensive setup to try and adapt to the modern style. Pick 3 is an awesome bonus if you take this attitude. Essentially furthering the rebuild twice in the same transaction.some pretty short term memories on here. Buckets wasn't the greatest but far from a spud.
hence why 3 clubs offered him large, long term deals
yes we got pick 3 . But a big KPD has been our achilles heel for a long long time and Ben I thought filled that role pretty well
agreed he wasn't at his best this year. But It's not a long stretch to think we'll struggle to replace him
"This isn't even my final form"Brady playing 4D chess at the moment.
He didn't actually turn pick 1 into Harry and George because we where getting Harry with our 1st pick anyway. So regardless if we traded pick 1 or not we where always getting Harry.So the guy that turned *** and pick 1 last year into Harry Sheezel and George Wardlaw is an idiot?
Maybe consider changing your user name to Wile E Coyote.
This is about where I am on it. On the one hand, getting rid of Buckets allows the coaches to tinker a bit with the defensive setup to try and adapt to the modern style. Pick 3 is an awesome bonus if you take this attitude. Essentially furthering the rebuild twice in the same transaction.
On the other hand, you'd be very optimistic to claim we have the personnel to create such a setup at the moment. Gorilla forwards are sort of going out of fashion, which is an argument against keeping Buckets, but we've seen Corr really struggle at times, and Dawson's a baby in footy terms. Logue started off well but dropped off badly before his injury. I've never seen someone spoil air so often. Pink is a fully unknown quantity, though I like that we're looking at the state leagues as an avenue to try and sort this out.
And as for the non-key positions, who do we have? LMac? Bergman's not got a defensive bone in his body. Sheezel pressures but has been bamboozled by small forwards. He'll probably end up further up the ground anyway. Goater could be a third tall but running power suggest he might be of more use up the ground too.
McKay was basically an anchor for that back six and the only proven name there. It now puts our defence in a position where basically the entire back six needs a do-over, with the added anxiety of ensuring that key forwards don't take hold of us, which we frankly did a reasonable job at doing last year given the supply that was coming in.
I'm sure the coaches and list managers are on it but we're coming back from a lot further back in this respect than ideal. I'm not worried about our mids and outside run at this point. I'm worried about our key forwards but not the four forward flank positions. Defence, though, we're absolutely all over the place. In just about every position