JASMINE GARNER
VS
MONIQUE CONTI
PER GAME AVERAGES
ADVANCED PER GAME AVERAGES
Player Games ToG (%) K H D DE (%) M T HO FF FA CLR MG GAs G B FA Jasmine Garner 74 85.0 13.4 6.3 19.8 64.6 4.0 4.7 0.0 1.4 0.6 3.8 318.8 0.5 0.8 0.5 89.1 Monique Conti 61 89.4 11.3 10.2 21.5 60.6 2.3 4.7 0.0 1.9 1.5 4.4 296.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 79.9
TOTALS
Player Games CP UCP i50 M50 R50 T50 TO I CM 1% CC SC C B SI SG Jasmine Garner 74 10.2 9.7 4.1 0.8 1.4 1.1 4.4 3.4 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.5 2.6 0.0 4.3 1.6 Monique Conti 61 12.2 9.8 3.2 0.3 1.5 0.8 5.0 3.8 0.3 0.8 1.4 3.0 4.1 0.8 2.8 1.0
ADVANCED TOTALS
Player Games K H D M T HO FF FA CLR MG GAs G B FA Jasmine Garner 74 995 467 1462 299 347 2 101 42 282 23591 37 62 39 6592 Monique Conti 61 690 620 1310 140 289 0 116 90 268 18088 13 19 26 4872
Player Games CP UCP i50 M50 R50 T50 TO I CM 1% CC SC C B SI SG Jasmine Garner 74 756 716 301 60 106 78 323 253 46 56 96 186 192 0 315 115 Monique Conti 61 747 595 197 18 91 48 303 232 19 49 86 182 250 46 171 62
I think these stats show that both players had terrific years with Jas being slightly ahead on nearly every measure.
I'm failrly comfortable now with Mon winning the award, she's a brilliant player that had a stand out year in a mid table side. That's a pretty standard recipe for a league best and fairest winner
I'm not comfortable though with Jas not being anywhere near the podium, despite being the best player in the league. It takes away the credibility of the award and tarnishes it for everyone
You could see the players were treating it as a bit of a joke during the count as well but when the best player is not getting votes it's impossible to take it seriously.
It's a real shame too. Mon doesn't deserve to have her acheivement undermined but when the voting system is so obviously flawed it pretty much just ruins the whole thing.