Autopsy Swans by 27 over GWS the 2nd quarter to be watched ad infinitum

Remove this Banner Ad

Well even with his average tog of 54.5% this year he was averaging more Pressure Acts than that of Wicks until tonight it is currently 11.5 per game compared to 11.9. He has also had 2 scoring shots per game compared to Wick's 1. So doesn't this prove that Warner even though he is a winger in the 2s he is versatile enough to play the small forward pressure forward role better than that of Wicks?

Warner is not a small forward.

Wicks leads on multiple stats both for this season and over their careers on averages regardless of how much you try to spin it.

IMG_0032.jpeg
IMG_0030.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0030.jpeg
    IMG_0030.jpeg
    239.5 KB · Views: 50

Log in to remove this ad.

Mills should get back in but who ever is dropped will be unlucky. Not sure who gets dropped.

Parker may not be so lucky. He’s been surpassed.

Fox maybe unlucky not sure he gets back in without a forced change. Maybe Campbell is vulnerable. He’s survived to date when I thought he’d be sent back to the 2’s.

Hard to change a winning team.

Not a bad problem to have.
Campbell is getting games he doesn't deserve due to the team winning anyways. They're trying to develop him, but I don't see much evidence of it working. Not all junior stars go on to be senior ones. That's just how it is. He lacks the elite strength and/or athleticism to be a star at senior level. His level seems to be 25th or so on our list.

Fox is CLEARLY the better player. Hope he is back next week.
 
not the same player per say but if Parker was available next week I think he would come in for wick's and least get a chance.

He has great goal sense as we have seen , can pinch in the middle or play mid in the forward 50 stoppages.

Besides pace let’s not talk garbage he is twice the player wicks is and Adams as FORWARD that is

Impact is impact how ever you want to spin it and he would be another threat teams would have to watch in the air and at stoppages in the 50

He will play this year and I bet he will be hungry as **** like no other year as he knows he is replaceable now unlike years before

He makes us better and experience goes a long way when the game slows up in September
 
Last edited:
not the same player per say but I’d Parker was available next week I think he would come in for wick's and least get a chance.

He has great goal sense as we have seen , can pinch in the middle or play mid in the forward 50 stoppages.

Besides pace let’s not talk garbage he is twice the player wicks is and Adams as FORWARD that is

Impact is impact how ever you want to spin it and he would be another threat teams would have to watch in the air and at stoppages on the 50

He will play this year
I have no doubt our coaching staff respect Luke as much as ever and if circumstances change, he will be straight back in the squad.

But at the present moment it’s entirely a hypothetical.
 
McLean should of had 5 in50 contested marks last night

He is sick a threat deep forward and that’s his strength and makes us even better

And playing McDonald in the ruck for stints and getting him amongst it early is helping him

If McDonald can be an outlet kick then these 2 change in roles will only make us better
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I hope Chad pulls up ok.

The way he fell on his shoulder is exactly the motion for a dislocation… may have even been a temporary subluxation? If there has been any damage whatsoever, he must be rested/rehab’ed till it’s 100% right. (I have some knowledge in this area having dislocated my shoulder 4 times 😫)
No offence intended, but... Chad is an elite athlete with hourly contact with elite sports physiotherapists and doctors.

Heeney is playing with a shoulder injury, Chad probably will too...
 
How many wins in a row before the thread isn't about all the guys we should drop 😂

I don't think some saw how slow Parker looked in the VFL, he was cooked by the end of those games.

He and others may come in and some get dropped , but for now it seems guy play a role.

I mean discuss what you want, but think there's a lot of positives to look at too.
 
How many wins in a row before the thread isn't about all the guys we should drop 😂

I don't think some saw how slow Parker looked in the VFL, he was cooked by the end of those games.

He and others may come in and some get dropped , but for now it seems guy play a role.

I mean discuss what you want, but think there's a lot of positives to look at too.
Roberts and Campbell have been dropped in that run

Is what it is
 
I feel like the way that we're talking is really damned if you, damned if you don't sort of stuff.

The way I see it we have two options
1. We don't change anything and lose
2. We mix stuff around, bring in Parker and drop Wicks, and we lose

Which will look dumber in hindsight? Because I think you need a very good reason to change a forward line that consistently creates over 100 points a game, and if we lose after changing what has worked all year, I'm going to go ahead and say that looks pretty dumb.
 
Roberts and Campbell have been dropped in that run

Is what it is


Yep, not having a go. Clearly they drop poor performers then, but they haven't dropped Wicks or picked Parker when fit, so perhaps that says something.

I'd just think we have other things to discuss.

Like Logan went to the ruck, you suggested it in the preview thread, look how well it worked
 
Last edited:
I just re-watched the post game press conference of Longmire and not once did he mention Wicks however he did mention about the versatility of Cleary being able to play in the midfield in the 2s and small forward for the 1s. Chad and Corey are obviously at different stages of their development and it is pretty damn obvious to me and many others that you don't watch the 1s game because Corey was BOG in it and was pretty unpredictable with his 3 goals including 1 where he acted as the small forward.


He was asked about Amartey having a down game after last weeks effort, and paraphrasing, but he said, " Oh you think he had a down one did you?" He got his back up a little and went on about competiting and playing his role, doing the team stuff. Yes it was about Amartry but , it applies to Wicks (IMO).

No one is saying people keep their spot because they are winning, but they keep it because they play a role.

Roberts was dropped, Fox has been dropped as Punts said, but Wicks hasn't which to me supports the idea that he is doing his job. Now if he gets dropped this week I will look a bit dumb, he is a role player who I see do little things that matter. Was yesterday his best game, not at all, he only did a couple of things, Maybe it is wrong to say the pressure is better with him in , Paps seems to have more space with him in, or maybe they are just true.

Lets see I guess. I just think the Horse answer on Amartey and the way he passionately responded to that speaks volumes.


But flip side I have whinged my **** off and been the most negative prick here often, so have at whatever you want of course :) We all just want to win.
 
I feel like the way that we're talking is really damned if you, damned if you don't sort of stuff.

The way I see it we have two options
1. We don't change anything and lose
2. We mix stuff around, bring in Parker and drop Wicks, and we lose

Which will look dumber in hindsight? Because I think you need a very good reason to change a forward line that consistently creates over 100 points a game, and if we lose after changing what has worked all year, I'm going to go ahead and say that looks pretty dumb.
Basically what none of us like to admit is that we’re all dealing with a known unknown.
 
I feel like the way that we're talking is really damned if you, damned if you don't sort of stuff.

The way I see it we have two options
1. We don't change anything and lose
2. We mix stuff around, bring in Parker and drop Wicks, and we lose

Which will look dumber in hindsight? Because I think you need a very good reason to change a forward line that consistently creates over 100 points a game, and if we lose after changing what has worked all year, I'm going to go ahead and say that looks pretty dumb.
In addition, you're risking tinkering with a symmetry that has developed to sensational levels between the forward group, the mids and the forward group, all to bring new in...

As far as I can see, we will continue debuting players via the sub to ensure their long term development. We'll deal with the Mills and Parker issues when they come up...

This wasn't a bad game... we played well. Losing Melican gave them an opportunity to mount a comeback, and they did. They're a good team.

I really don't think Rowie is getting enough love! Heeney injured, Warner tagged... up steps Rowie! Sublime!!!!
 
No offence intended, but... Chad is an elite athlete with hourly contact with elite sports physiotherapists and doctors.

Heeney is playing with a shoulder injury, Chad probably will too...
Yes you’re right, but with a 3 game (plus %) buffer, I’d prefer they play it safe with Chad if need be.

Yes both he and Heeney can play with some shoulder injury/pain, but given our ladder position, I’m sure our medical staff will ‘manage’ them as required.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy Swans by 27 over GWS the 2nd quarter to be watched ad infinitum

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top