Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII - 'Loopy' Gone Off The Rails

Remove this Banner Ad

Calls have been intercepted.

"Without me, you're nothing! What have you won without me??, Huh? I managed to win dozens of trade weeks for you, performed better than the lot of you. Dozens of articles this time each year were written about me and my skills, the only non Robbo articles about you lot that praised the club and gave hope to your followers. I'm now going to move to the Saints so they can finally win something! Me and SOS combined will be the ultimate tag team."
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Owies could have walked to the PSD or been taken as a DFA, not much value for a player of his type.
We also picked up some extra late picks which will ensure we're good to match bids for Ben and Lucas Campo.

Pick 12 and 14 vs Pick 3 is down to preference, really. Nothing inherently wrong with thinking we should have kept the later picks.

My view is that one of those two picks, statistically, won't work out. Pick 3 might be a bust too (ie. Dow), but is also a good chance of being a game-changer.

What I like about it is that there are a handful of midfielders vying for early selection that have traits we need. Draper is express, Reid is an elite distributor, Smith racks up a billion touches, cuts through traffic and uses the ball well, Smillie is a Cripps who can kick.

The players at 12-14 have some good traits, but a few of them have (as you'd expect) big question marks as well, Travaglia has a good turn of speed but his disposal is a bit suspect and his best position is probably wing (where we've stocked up on kids already). Lindsay is a good user of the ball but to my eye can be quite fumbly at ground level. Tauru and Trainor could be good defensive options, but Trainor has concussion concerns and Tauru isn't really KPP size. Hotton could have been good picks for our forward line, but has had his share of injuries.

The "one" that I'd have loved is Berry.

So Berry plus a "maybe" player, vs a top 3 midfielder with pace and/or good disposal.
Very good argument Blue..Thanks a bunch :)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

we don't need any more onballers...our priority is a key big defender (two would be great) ...hope his disposal is better than his cousins cause he costs us with his woeful disposal.
Agree on SW’s disposal / needs to be working on that as the 1st port of call over the off/pre-seasons (+ when/where to call for the ball).

Obviously no back problems will be high up there too.
 
Trade 3 for 6 and 10, send 10 to Port for Houston.
Actually very possible if we wanted to go down that path...

GC give 6, get Rioli
RICH give Rioli, Shai, get 3 and 30
FRE give 10 and 30, get Shai
CARL give 3, get 6 and 10

Can throw in Kennedy somewhere and get back late picks to sweeten the deal if required.

Gee that pick 3 has some power at the trade table right now if Austin really wanted to test the waters.

On trade 10 for Houston, take Lalor at 6... now my mind is really racing!
 
Glicksy!

Kamala Harris Waiting GIF by Election 2020
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XXXVII - 'Loopy' Gone Off The Rails

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top