Search results for query: *

Reckon this is a good point. Robert Harvey was not that fast but no one could catch him. It's how the bloke plays, and how the team plays too. Both Dusty and Cotch could 180 turning to their right. A combo of strength, agility and smarts can do more than just speed. Menadue was quick, but...

But running is the problem. On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app

Really promising stuff today. Seems a natural defender. Got his hand in a couple of times to spoil the mark, which are usually those ones we don't spoil for some reason resulting in some ordinary forward kicking a bag. Good positioning, good desperation. He's been developed well. Big thanks to...

How's the leap on him? Incredible spring. I can see him playing at either end. Kinda feels like we mostly need him forward though right? On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app

I'd imagine you're not happy then? On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app

Not on the injury list and didn't play today. Anyone have any idea what's going on?

When we won.

I've never been less interested in the draft or trades. It's awesome.

Massive man-crush going on here.

Reminds me of Chris Johnson, without the speckies. Still very strong overhead though. Courageous, difficult to get passed, yet attacking when he has it, a brilliant kick. Don't think he's quite as agile as Johnson was, but I think they have similar traits. Pretty happy to be thinking along these...

I am amused by anyone who refers to a thread on a footy forum as "pointless".

Please don't let it be that he'll actually play. He's so very bad at footy and we're always crap when he's in. I'd rather we continue with the patchwork than go back to this dead set hack.

Is it not the job of the recruiter to determine which is which? My point is that over time you can have a basis to work out if a recruiter is actually any good at doing that. Otherwise, you might as well just employ anyone to do it.

But at some point you have to determine if a professional is actually good at their job or not. The job being difficult is not really relevant. With enough of a body of work, which we definitely have with FJ, it is possible to analyse performance. Of course, everyone will have differing views...

It is my contention that Prestia has the capacity to make us all happy, and isn't that a lovely thing?

Snarkin' hell!

Think you may have taken that the wrong way by the rather snarky reply. It would've been good for us and him if he'd kicked more accurately for goal. That's all.

Wish he'd kicked accurately in front of goal this year. His season would look a lot better and so would our percentage.

High ball drop?

So you want me to suck on the sex stick? Not my first choice.

Sounds uncomfortable.

A young man with plenty of practice stroking it...

Reckon that's his best game for the club. Got a lot in the first half to help set up the win and the only crap kick that comes to mind was a goal. That's the sort of game that justifies a trade like that. As most people who have questioned the trade have said, if he can be fit and play to his...

Give him a chance to have a full preseason and he may be fit enough to carry those jocks!

God help the kid, the excitement here is reaching ridiculous proportions.

These are genuine questions I'm asking. What's the general consensus on his eventual position and output? We can see what he is now, but where do we think he'll end up? I'm hoping midfield, not sure if he'll win enough pill or be good enough a runner, so maybe half back. Just curious.

There's a 109 page merry-go-round of a thread where the debate is over whether one of them can play at all. I think the sensible thing to have done would've been to play Miles at the start of the year and ease Prestia's body into fitness before adding him to the team. Neither are great...

Can he double his output? Will there be a midfield position for him or is he a half back? Looks good when he has it. Seems stronger - doesn't find the pill all that much.

Will do what? Be tall? Be inadequate? Do very little? The rumba? Long division?

Impressively repetitive thread this one.