Search results for query: *

Hence Gil is batting for, effectively, the prosecution. In his words. He is not making up part of the AFL Commission in this case. Obviously the AFL has some choice in the matter, otherwise the meeting wouldn't be going ahead. That's all I am saying.

I'm guessing it's not WADA rules that he be stripped of the medal, otherwise it would have happened already and there'd be no need for a meeting of the AFL Commission

Headline: Watson Brownlow call to wait for November Commission meeting Perhaps CAS has no jurisdiction over the awarding / stripping of the Brownlow

I don't think the job of the peptides was to make the kicking more accurate. I guess if you really wanted to make a thin connection, you could say that the peptides are designed to reduce muscle fatigue, allowing the player to perform better for longer, and might therefore be less inclined to...

Maybe your skills got better. I don't think you can take "whatever" and expect your kicking to be better without doing anything else.

They were better in 2012 than in 2016, as a direct result of taking PEDs. Is this what you mean?

Has anyone yet realised that this isn't Gil's decision to make? It comes to the AFL Commission, which Gil would normally be a part of, but in this instance he is not. In fact, he has publicly stated he would back whatever recommendation went to the Commission as far as whether to strip the...