Would be interested to hear the exact circumstances of what happened. It's odd that this even got sent to court.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Boston Legal is one of my all time favorite series - Denny Crane was absolutely hilarious, never lost a caseDenny Crane
Boston Legal is one of my all time favorite series - Denny Crane was absolutely hilarious, never lost a case
Heraldsun also reporting that we withdrew a 3-year offer at 350k per year and replaced it with a 1-year deal when we found out about the situation. I imagine we will be pretty quick to extend him though if he does well over preseason and cracks the team early.
Put in the work on and off the field and he'll earn the additional years. Prove yourself lad and put this behind you.
Had heard a stir that he may already have been taken under Walsh's wing much like Ollie has neen at times the past year.Yep. He'll figure it out pretty quick seeing the professionalism & training standards set by Walsh, Cripps & co. Not to mention his younger bro. Regardless of this however, it's obviously his circle of mates outside of footy that he needs to think long and hard about...
Put in the work on and off the field and he'll earn the additional years. Prove yourself lad and put this behind you.
It was before the trade went through. The 3-year deal was on the table, and we replaced it with a 1-year after finding out about the charges.I don't understand how we can change the terms of the deal in such a significant way after the trade has gone through.
I'm not sure I'm a big fan of this move when we already knew about the issue before the trade occurred. Doesn't seem right to me.
i'd imagine the personal terms weren't signed yet, remember he apparently told the club of this during the season, well before trade period.I don't understand how we can change the terms of the deal in such a significant way after the trade has gone through.
I'm not sure I'm a big fan of this move when we already knew about the issue before the trade occurred. Doesn't seem right to me.
I hope he has a huge season and then bends us over and asks for way more than he would've got paid otherwise
You either back the kid in, or you don't - can't be toeing the line here
In that case I'd still demand more if I am his management - Carlton lose all leverage and Elijah should dictate terms accordingly.I suspect we will extend him pretty early if he has a good preseason and looks like being best 22.
I am surprised it went to court.Jeez EJ, not a great idea to lose your wallet in the toilets with a gram of coke in it
Explains the charge thou, that’s a “whoops” of the highest order.
Like it, dumb mistake- nothing sinister or character questioning (being a dick to cops etc) just a good ol fashion balls up
In that case I'd still demand more if I am his management - Carlton lose all leverage and Elijah should dictate terms accordingly.
Apparently the Qld police are looking for a man fitting this description for allegedly planting cocaine inside of a man's wallet which was mistakenly left in the toilets at Star Casino in Broadbeach, on or around the beginning of AFL trade week.Jeez EJ, not a great idea to lose your wallet in the toilets with a gram of coke in it
Explains the charge thou, that’s a “whoops” of the highest order.
Like it, dumb mistake- nothing sinister or character questioning (being a dick to cops etc) just a good ol fashion balls up
In that case I'd still demand more if I am his management - Carlton lose all leverage and Elijah should dictate terms accordingly.
It's odd though as the Club said when the story broke that Hollands had informed them of the incident months back (clearly, they'd been talking for some time).....It was before the trade went through. The 3-year deal was on the table, and we replaced it with a 1-year after finding out about the charges.
Probably why the trade was on then off then on again. Elijah happy to come and GoldCoast happy to trade him based on what both parties initially believed they would receive. We obviously recalibrated our offer based on the facts, leading them to reconsider whether the move was still worthwhile. After consideration they probably figured it was still the best outcome for all parties hence the result.
I personally would have been happy to stick with a 3-year deal even given the circumstances but the added motivation of his deal ending at the end of 2024 might not hurt.
I don't think the timeline was like that. According to the Hun "A rising AFL star and recent Carlton recruit has admitted to possessing cocaine, found in his wallet in the bathroom of a Queensland casino, just a month before signing with the high-profile club".It's odd though as the Club said when the story broke that Hollands had informed them of the incident months back (clearly, they'd been talking for some time).....
So they knew about it seemingly before they offered 3 years?!!
yeah, sounds reasonable!I don't think the timeline was like that. According to the Hun "A rising AFL star and recent Carlton recruit has admitted to possessing cocaine, found in his wallet in the bathroom of a Queensland casino, just a month before signing with the high-profile club".
So the offer for the 3 years, before the wallet fiasco. Told the club. Offer changed to one year in the month leading up to the trade.