Who wins and who loses is random but the machines are 100% rigged to pay out less than you put in. Over time they can not lose, hence the revenue made from them.They are not determined, it is random.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who wins and who loses is random but the machines are 100% rigged to pay out less than you put in. Over time they can not lose, hence the revenue made from them.They are not determined, it is random.
Saying it is rigged to pay out less is misleading, it is random with the edge in the favour of the house, no different to roulette or tossing a coin. If you are specifically singling out electronic machines as rigged in contrast to a manual game like roulette then you don't understand probability and randomness.Who wins and who loses is random but the machines are 100% rigged to pay out less than you put in. Over time they can not lose, hence the revenue made from them.
Alligned Leisure is being run by a few blokes that ran a similar business for another organisation that was never really financially stable.Richmond is still in the early stages of setting up its Aligned Leisure group.
It needs the pokies money as AL is not financially stable.
The Aligned Leisure group made 8,639,721 but it's expenses was 9,622,630.
It's still needs a few more years.
Probably in the minority but I dont have an issue with clubs having pokies linked revenue. It's a legal activity and while some pokies users have gambling addictions some alcohol users suffer from alcoholism but we are perfectly happy for alcohol companies to sponsor.
Same could be said for Crownbet the official betting partner of the AFL.
I dont like odds as part of broadcasts though.
I'd rather clubs dope tbh. If they need more money to subsidize the games lack of appeal to wider audiences they should just make the players better/more watchable. It's better than destroying lives and triggering domestic violence against women
Yeah. Those things didnt exist before poker machines. And dont exist in areas with no poker machines.
Of course we should ban things which are no issue for the majority, because a minority cant control themselves.
Agreed with this. Piss off pokies, ruining too many lives.https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl...censes-to-operate-pokies-20181029-p50cl8.html
Carlton, Richmond, Essendon, St Kilda, Hawthorn.
Not a fan of pokies and I think clubs can do without them. If financially poorer clubs North and the Bullies can do without then there really isn't any excuse other then greed.
That is the definition of rigged. Roulette is completely random and cant be controlled by the house and a coin toss is a literal 50/50. These machines are coded and designed to make the house serious moneySaying it is rigged to pay out less is misleading, it is random with the edge in the favour of the house, no different to roulette or tossing a coin. If you are specifically singling out electronic machines as rigged in contrast to a manual game like roulette then you don't understand probability and randomness.
The machines are not designed for the self-controlled casual user. chucking in a few dollars while waiting for their meal to be served.
That is the definition of rigged. Roulette is completely random and cant be controlled by the house and a coin toss is a literal 50/50. These machines are coded and designed to make the house serious money
What? are they using magnets or somehting to hit exact numbers that arent being bet on? How do you control extreme variables like the different speeds they spin the wheel, how quick the ball is being rolled and how much the ball bounces on the way down, especially the bounce. How is that similar to a coded software program specifically designed for the house to take money?You dont get how Roulette works then.
I thought the game was more watchable before the players became supremely fit, tbh.I'd rather clubs dope tbh. If they need more money to subsidize the games lack of appeal to wider audiences they should just make the players better/more watchable. It's better than destroying lives and triggering domestic violence against women
Lol, spot the pokie player. They are programmed to pay out anywhere from 60-80 cents for every dollar put in on average so yes, while every game is 'random' they are programmed to make you lose.Saying it is rigged to pay out less is misleading, it is random with the edge in the favour of the house, no different to roulette or tossing a coin. If you are specifically singling out electronic machines as rigged in contrast to a manual game like roulette then you don't understand probability and randomness.
What? are they using magnets or somehting to hit exact numbers that arent being bet on? How do you control extreme variables like the different speeds they spin the wheel, how quick the ball is being rolled and how much the ball bounces on the way down, especially the bounce. How is that similar to a coded software program specifically designed for the house to take money?
Pokies arent designed to take a specific amount of money. They have a certain number of outcomes and a certain probability of those outcomes happening randomly. Exactly like roulette or blackjack. They dont play catchup.What? are they using magnets or somehting to hit exact numbers that arent being bet on? How do you control extreme variables like the different speeds they spin the wheel, how quick the ball is being rolled and how much the ball bounces on the way down, especially the bounce. How is that similar to a coded software program specifically designed for the house to take money?