2009 Trade Discussion - Part 3

[swanton]

hey guys cant decide between 2 trades opinions are appreciated

harvey to hartlett then walker to pav

or

t cloke to warren then harvey to bartel

thanx

 

[bigburger]

hey guys cant decide between 2 trades opinions are appreciated

harvey to hartlett then walker to pav

or

t cloke to warren then harvey to bartel

thanx

First one

 

[senrulzisback]

i know that but i cannot, if i get hartlett, ill have to settle for someone lower than riewoldt... like SJ

Get Pav....Or get DeBoer instead of Barham, should play the rest of the season.

 

[carlton__09]

I have got Robinson on the bench and I need to get rid of him.
The options are Hartlett and Barham who are both going to rise in $ this week.

Hartlett (138,600)- seems like a great player who should play most games with an average of around 60 - 75 IMO. He will be a good fill in plus cashcow for perhaps Skipworth etc.

Barham(86,600)- Decent player has proven he can score well. Likeliness to hold his spot isn't very high but he has a better b.e and is 50k cheaper.

At the moment I am leaning towards Barham because depending on how many more games he plays he should rise more in price than Hartlett. I don't need him to play or be an emergency because I also have beams on the bench and I believe he will make more of a profit than hartlett.

People's opinions??? Other arguments, reasons I have missed???

 

[NT.Thunder]

hey guys cant decide between 2 trades opinions are appreciated

harvey to hartlett then walker to pav

or

t cloke to warren then harvey to bartel

thanx

Depends what your after......You need to work out if you want results now or to come home strong.

Hartlett imo isn't 1 to miss out on, but having said that it depends on how many cash cows you may already have.

I like the 1st option personally, If people dont think that Pav will be in the final 3 fwds for the year i reckon there kiddin themselves.

 

[Loud Eagle]

I have got Robinson on the bench and I need to get rid of him.
The options are Hartlett and Barham who are both going to rise in $ this week.

Hartlett (138,600)- seems like a great player who should play most games with an average of around 60 - 75 IMO. He will be a good fill in plus cashcow for perhaps Skipworth etc.

Barham(86,600)- Decent player has proven he can score well. Likeliness to hold his spot isn't very high but he has a better b.e and is 50k cheaper.

At the moment I am leaning towards Barham because depending on how many more games he plays he should rise more in price than Hartlett. I don't need him to play or be an emergency because I also have beams on the bench and I believe he will make more of a profit than hartlett.

People's opinions??? Other arguments, reasons I have missed???

Why not wait for a look at shelden, cockie and de boer? All 75000

 

[Damon_3388]

I'm thinking of these trades this week:

Mitch Robinson > Hamish Hartlett
Brent Harvey > Steve Johnson

I'm roughly $17,000 short on being able to get Paul Chapman instead of Stevie J as well.

Would Leon Davis be just as good an option as Johnson, as his average is almost the same, but he's roughly $24,000 cheaper?

I'd also consider the following as well:

Taylor Walker > Ben Warren
Brent Harvey > Paul Chapman

Thoughts?

 

[RU486]

Anyone know Simmonds status, is he expected to come back anytime soon?
Would be nice to trade him out so I can upgrade Hille to Cox, but I wont if he is expected to resume playing soon.

 

[viper101]

Skippy out this week for Warren (given his time to return on injury list remained unchanged and also have Harvey who i want to hold for a straight swap in a couple of weeks)

Also thinking about Tuck to hartlett. This one is bothering me because i would have to run Beams, hartlett and rich in the mids for a couple of weeks but would have $300+k in the bank to upgrade beams and rish to fallen premiums.

Any thoughts?

 

[Notorious_29]

have skippy in the mids, have the cash to upgrade him this week, would really like to as i am currently playing 3 rookies on the field in the mids and also have 19 trades ledt.

already have ablett, swan, stanton

can afford anyone except bartel (will upgrade otten to bartel a little bit later).

who else do you think will be top 6 mids come year end.

options are - montagna, corey, dal santo, priddis, cross, kornes, gibbs, boyd, thompson, pendlebury, hayes, sewell, selwood, lewis.

bolded are preffered options at this stage.

thoughts???

anyone?

 

[nevergunalerners]

Why not wait for a look at shelden, cockie and de boer? All 75000

Because Hartlett will rise this week.

What are peoples thoughts on Cockie or deBoer's security in their respective sides compared with Hartlett. Also who will make the most money?

Note: At $60,000 more than the others, Hartlett needs to score 15ppg more.

 

[GrandBlue]

Ok, I've already downgraded Walker to Warren. I can't afford much so I'm going for a double downgrade this week, the next target is the midfield. Who should I downgrade for Hartlett? Robinson, Rich or Otten?

 

[Notorious_29]

Ok, I've already downgraded Walker to Warren. I can't afford much so I'm going for a double downgrade this week, the next target is the midfield. Who should I downgrade for Hartlett? Robinson, Rich or Otten?

neither all wastes. rich and otten havent peaked, robinson ---> HH is a waste. your not going to have hartlett in your final 22 so why waste a trade when ur only making 18 k.

 

[Affidavit]

So many options for me this week I cannot choose!

My Team is as follows:

Backs: Cornes, Lockyer, Goddard, Houlihan, Adcock, Hill, Suban (Raines, Broughton)

Mids: Gibbs, Swan, Kornes, Rich, DDD, Hasleby (Beams, Robinson)

Rucks: Cox, McIntosh (Jacobs, Spencer)

Forwards: Chapman, Higgins, Deledio, Pav, Roughead, Ziebell, Walker (Brown, Nahas)

Bank: $167,600

Option 1: Robinson to Hartlett, Hasleby to Bartel
Option 2: Robinson to Hartlett, Ziebell to Buddy
Option 3: Robinson to Barham/Hartlett (not sure if I will have enough if I choose Hartlett), Hill to Hodge

Option 4: Something else???

I like option 1 at the minute

Thought everyone??

 

[Loud Eagle]

Because Hartlett will rise this week.

What are peoples thoughts on Cockie or deBoer's security in their respective sides compared with Hartlett. Also who will make the most money?

Note: At $60,000 more than the others, Hartlett needs to score 15ppg more.

I have Rich and beams on the feild with Robinson and Anthony on the bench. I wont be getting Hartlett this week, I will be looking closely at both Cockie and de boer. Not sure about eithers scoring, both imo would be expected to be fairly good. Both have fairly good job security, de boer is a very good chance to play the rest of the season if he plays well enough

 

[GrandBlue]

Hmm... Griffen maybe? I need to downgrade something. I only have 339 to spend when I trade in Skipworth, I want to set up 2 big trades next week.

 

[Loud Eagle]

So many options for me this week I cannot choose!

My Team is as follows:

Backs: Cornes, Lockyer, Goddard, Houlihan, Adcock, Hill, Suban (Raines, Broughton)

Mids: Gibbs, Swan, Kornes, Rich, DDD, Hasleby (Beams, Robinson)

Rucks: Cox, McIntosh (Jacobs, Spencer)

Forwards: Chapman, Higgins, Deledio, Pav, Roughead, Ziebell, Walker (Brown, Nahas)

Bank: $167,600

Option 1: Robinson to Hartlett, Hasleby to Bartel
Option 2: Robinson to Hartlett, Ziebell to Buddy
Option 3: Robinson to Barham/Hartlett (not sure if I will have enough if I choose Hartlett), Hill to Hodge

Option 4: Something else???

I like option 1 at the minute

Thought everyone??

If it was my team number 3 would be a go

 

[Mordecai]

Thinking of going...

In: Mackie, Warren
Out: Dempsey, Walker

I still have Raines and Skipworth in my team.

 

[Affidavit]

If it was my team number 3 would be a go

Hmmm my main concern is that Hase BE is 100 and he will not get that especially now with palmer out, he will get even more attention.

Maybe I just like the sound of Bartel in my team lol

 

[senrulzisback]

So many options for me this week I cannot choose!

My Team is as follows:

Backs: Cornes, Lockyer, Goddard, Houlihan, Adcock, Hill, Suban (Raines, Broughton)

Mids: Gibbs, Swan, Kornes, Rich, DDD, Hasleby (Beams, Robinson)

Rucks: Cox, McIntosh (Jacobs, Spencer)

Forwards: Chapman, Higgins, Deledio, Pav, Roughead, Ziebell, Walker (Brown, Nahas)

Bank: $167,600

Option 1: Robinson to Hartlett, Hasleby to Bartel
Option 2: Robinson to Hartlett, Ziebell to Buddy
Option 3: Robinson to Barham/Hartlett (not sure if I will have enough if I choose Hartlett), Hill to Hodge

Option 4: Something else???

I like option 1 at the minute

Thought everyone??

Not bad options, although give it a bit of time. Unless you are going Robinson ---> Hartlett. Leave the rest to later.

 

[Affidavit]

Not bad options, although give it a bit of time. Unless you are going Robinson ---> Hartlett. Leave the rest to later.

So you reckon number 1 as well?

 

[oddsok]

I think I'm going to settle on these trades:

Rich>Hartlett

Hille>Sandi

First trade is because I don't want to miss the boat on Hartlett. Gains me 100k, and I don't think Rich is going to go up much from now (FFG gives his BE as 62)
Second trade is because Kreuzer is too unreliable in my eyes, still young and I doubt he will pull out consistent high scores (ie. 90+), and am satying away from HMac because of injury and he is more expensive. Not only that but picking sandi might be a little more unique, and IMO safer.

Thoughts?

 

[Glassjaw]

Two options:

Hille to Kreuzer and Harvey to Franklin this week, Skippy to Giansiracusa next week.

or

Hille to McIntosh and Harvey to Franklin this week, Robinson out for 86k rookie and Skippy to Giansiracusa next week.

Thoughts?

 

[senrulzisback]

So you reckon number 1 as well?

Just half of it, leave the other half for later.

 

[Mordecai]

Is Rich to Hartlett worth it?